Tiger Woods in Car Crash

[Radovan's Caravan]

Seeing as it's not the first time I have mentioned it, your observation skills aren't all they are cracked up to be.

A backhanded compliment if ever there was one

Not everything in life is complicated.

[/quote

(Discuss) Hmm... where does one start with a statement like that? Is 'dishing the dirt' on somebody necessarily any easier to understand, say, than 'framing' someone? That is not to suggest of course that Woods has not done at least some of the things that have been alleged but we have not as yet heard his side of the story (a point I am sure that is not lost on a silk-in-waiting like your good self).

And if you would indulge me a little longer... is hoaxing the general public a behaviour that is beyond the comprehension of anyone of average intelligence (and any such person who could be bothered to spend just a little time forensically examining all the reports of the events alleged to have taken place in Windermere Fla on the 27/11 last would be forced to conclude that on the balance of probabilities much of the tale is a malicious hoax)?

You might care to remember an altogether more pleasant hoax that was practiced on prospective UK tourists recently and was also a general topic on this board:

To the best of my knowledge and belief your Torygraph has never fessed up to its role in this silly stunt. And, much as I hate to blow my own trumpet, I was the only one on this forum who didn't fall for it.

In the warped world of western media (as well as everywhere else) every day is April 1st...

[Edmund]

I posted that story with the squirrel

If I remember correctly it was hardly a debated topic on here and was posted in the amusing news stories thread.

And sherlock it was no hoax http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/...to-crasher.html

[Radovan's Caravan]

I posted that story with the squirrel

If I remember correctly it was hardly a debated topic on here and was posted in the amusing news stories thread.

And sherlock it was no hoax http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/...to-crasher.html

You are unbelievably naive and very gullible. There are so many problematics with this couple's story:

1) The chances of achieving a hi def image like that by accident even with autofocus are several hundred to one.

2) The squirrel is almost certainly the product of taxidermy - the animal's posture is unnatural and rigid.

3) The shot has been posed - the animal does not obscure either the couple nor does it blot out key areas in the backdrop.

4) The syndication route of this photograph is one that would be selected by a savvy marketeer.

Most photographic experts that have studied this shot (as remarks in the very link that you have provided suggest) believe this shot to be a clever hoax.

PS Got any shots of Santa on his flying sled?

[Edmund]

Whatever floats your boat mate. Couldn't give a toss

[Guest]

Stuff.

Look, just cut to the chase, and tell me how hard done by Mickeh Adams was.

Stuff about a squirrel.

I have a great picture of a squirrel posing. I took it in Boston, Mass. He posed, fair and square. It is a bloody good photo, truth be told.

[Babylon]

Whilst obviously not without brains, there definitely seems to be a loose connection somewhere in there.

I'm not talking about Tiger or the squizzle either.

[Daggers]

Whilst obviously not without brains, there definitely seems to be a loose connection somewhere in there.

I'm not talking about Tiger or the squizzle either.

You have to wonder at the marvel of it all.

[Radovan's Caravan]

Whilst obviously not without brains, there definitely seems to be a loose connection somewhere in there.

I'm not talking about Tiger or the squizzle either.

I'd hang fire on the insults if I were you until this affair has played out (and you may not have to wait long as there's no better time for a tragic denoument than the festive season). Anyone obviously bereft of brains can see that I might be onto something here.

It's garbage reporting like this piece in 'The Daily Mail' that makes me feel deeply uneasy:

Shamed golf star Tiger Woods is reported to have fled to the Bahamas on his luxury £14million yacht.

He was joined in the 155ft vessel called Privacy by a group of golfing pals - and not his wife Elin Nordegren.

A limo with blacked out windows was seen arriving at Old Port Cover in North Palm Beach, Florida, where the yacht has been moored for over a week.

Woods's 155-foot yacht left its mooring in North Palm Beach over the weekend

The boat slipped its mooring over the weekend with staff at the marina speculating that it was headed to the Bahamas.

Extra provisions were seen being loaded on the yacht before it departed.

Woods, 33, has not been seen in public since being linked with more than 12 women and admitted he had cheated on his wife.

Happier times: Elin Nordegren is said to be planning to divorce her golf star husband

Elin, 29, is said to be planning to spend Christmas in her native Sweden with her family before filing for divorce.

According to People magazine an unnamed friend said Woods planned to cruise the Bahamas over the Christmas break.

'Tiger's boat Privacy has been docked at Old Port Cove in North Palm Beach for more than a week,' the source told the magazine.

Porn star Holly Sampson, left, and party organiser Rachel Uchitel are among the 12 women who were allegedly involved with Woods

On Saturday morning, after stocking up on provisions from Costco the boat left town.'

Tight security has been in force at the Marina after Wood's yacht arrived.

Its crew had attempted to conceal the yacht's name by draping a sheet over the bow of the vessel.

The luxury yacht has all the comforts of home, including a gym, Jacuzzi and sky lounge bar.

It also has a 12,000 gallon fuel tank that gives it a range of 4,000 miles.

Strange, yesterday's Screws had him in Maryland 'with a friend'. And we were all told last week that he would be spending Xmas in Sweden with Elin and kids (although we were also informed he was going into rehab in Arizona before tearing up that plan and going instead for 'Option X' - shutting himself away in his OTHER home in Florida to play er 'night golf' - The Sun 17.12). Interesting (and disturbing) to see whether the yacht narrative is allowed to sail or whether the copy pirates hijack it and head back to shore.

Whatever, we can be pretty damn sure now that Woods won't be where they say he is...

[Daggers]

Exactly, Babs - don't you remember all of those times Chandler's conspiracy guff has panned out into fact?

Not quite as many times as he has threatened to beat people up in Coventry before clucking off with his tail wedged up his arse mark you.

[Guest]

Tiger Woods goes into hiding? Wow. Whatever next?

[Babylon]

I'd hang fire on the insults if I were you until this affair has played out

If everything you said was true, I would still believe you were a fairy short of a Christmas tree.

[Radovan's Caravan]

If everything you said was true, I would still believe you were a fairy short of a Christmas tree.

Reluctantly admitting I might be on to something but saving face with risque improvised insult.

Good ploy.

[Daggers]

[Radovan's Caravan]

Strange, yesterday's Screws had him in Maryland 'with a friend'. And we were all told last week that he would be spending Xmas in Sweden with Elin and kids (although we were also informed he was going into rehab in Arizona before tearing up that plan and going instead for 'Option X' - shutting himself away in his OTHER home in Florida to play er 'night golf' - The Sun 17.12). Interesting (and disturbing) to see whether the yacht narrative is allowed to sail or whether the copy pirates hijack it and head back to shore.

Whatever, we can be pretty damn sure now that Woods won't be where they say he is...

Well one celebrity site (Gossip Cop) has broken ranks:

Weeks of scandal allegedly pushed Tiger Woods out to sea, with reports everywhere announcing that the golf great had set sail from Florida aboard his yacht.

“Tiger’s boat Privacy has been docked… for more than a week,” a source told People.com, but “On Saturday morning, after stocking up on provisions from Costco… the boat left town.” Another “source” informed the magazine’s site that Woods “is going to cruise in the Bahamas for a few days.”

Habitually wrong paparazzi site X17Online agreed, “reporting” that over the weekend Woods was “flee[ing] the country” on his private yacht, and had “set sail… for a rumored cruise to the Bahamas.”

One tiny problem.

The yacht hasn’t budged.

Sources in Palm Beach assure Gossip Cop that the luxury yacht is still docked at the marina, exactly where it’s been, and add that multiple eyewitness accounts refute the widely disseminated rumor of Woods sailing from Florida to calmer waters abroad.

So we’re left with two possibilities.

1. Woods was so anxious to “flee” the country (and wife Elin Nordegren) that he “yachted” to the Bahamas without a yacht. (Maybe he swam?)

2. Under scrutiny, the story sinks.

Yeah, we’re going with #2.

Mainstream media are still on board the yacht - but for how long?

[Webbo]

Well one celebrity site (Gossip Cop) has broken ranks:

Weeks of scandal allegedly pushed Tiger Woods out to sea, with reports everywhere announcing that the golf great had set sail from Florida aboard his yacht.

“Tiger’s boat Privacy has been docked… for more than a week,” a source told People.com, but “On Saturday morning, after stocking up on provisions from Costco… the boat left town.” Another “source” informed the magazine’s site that Woods “is going to cruise in the Bahamas for a few days.”

Habitually wrong paparazzi site X17Online agreed, “reporting” that over the weekend Woods was “flee[ing] the country” on his private yacht, and had “set sail… for a rumored cruise to the Bahamas.”

One tiny problem.

The yacht hasn’t budged.

Sources in Palm Beach assure Gossip Cop that the luxury yacht is still docked at the marina, exactly where it’s been, and add that multiple eyewitness accounts refute the widely disseminated rumor of Woods sailing from Florida to calmer waters abroad.

So we’re left with two possibilities.

1. Woods was so anxious to “flee” the country (and wife Elin Nordegren) that he “yachted” to the Bahamas without a yacht. (Maybe he swam?)

2. Under scrutiny, the story sinks.

Yeah, we’re going with #2.

Mainstream media are still on board the yacht - but for how long?

What's your point?

[skinnydipper]

I like Chandler. The combination of intelligence, an inventive mind and a barbed tongue makes,at times , for interesting reading (certainly moreso than a thread telling me that some spang is eating a digestive right now!) and his posts in the Madeleine McCann thread were top drawer albeit that after so much promise he failed to deliver the coup de grace in respect of the suggested conspiracy theories. That said the Tiger Woods posts do rather seem like the ramblings of a confused mind so step it up Chandler or move on to something a bit more interesting.

And what's in the username? The only Radovan I know of possesses nothing like a Bailey Senator Carmargue .

[hairy]

Mainstream media are still on board the yacht - but for how long?

Why should we care?

A bloke has been caught being unfaithful to his wife. He has lowered his profile. Can we move on now....

[Edmund]

Radovan, breaking news on ssn is that a pack of chocolate digestives, I repeat a pack of chocolate digestives was seen making it's way on board the yacht being carried by a taxi driver. Reports suggest that it hasn't left yet and the taxi driver returned from the yacht empty handed.

Can you shed any light on this or have a reasonable explanation? I would be most interested.

[l444ry]

Tales of Tiger - Latest

Early last evening, nuns at the Our Lady of Dismal Perpetuality convent dialled police emergency when they heard the sounds of a break-in.

"We heard glass breaking, and then hoarse, heavy breathing", said Sister Mary George. "We were all in our beds and accounted for, so we knew something was up."

The intruder apparently fled when police sirens sounded in the distance.

Across the street from the convent, Radovan Caravan looked out the windows of his stakeout when he heard the sirens. "It's not often that things happen around here that warrant a siren or two," he said in a rather longwinded way.

Radovan, an avid sleuth, says there's absolutely no mistake about what he saw.

"There he was, Tiger Woods, plain as day, naked as a jaybird, running like a madman with his shirt and trousers bundled under his arm", Radovan said. "He ran right across the street, under the street lamp, and disappeared into the trees behind the church."

Sister Mary George is glad things turned out as they did.

"If things had gone much further", she remarked, "we'd all be in newspapers and television shows and people would be calling us all 'the Tiger Nuns'."

"That would have been dreadful", she giggled.

Police are combing the area, but it appears Tiger has disappeared once again, pursued by Radovan.

[lou]

Tales of Tiger - Latest

Early last evening, nuns at the Our Lady of Dismal Perpetuality convent dialled police emergency when they heard the sounds of a break-in.

"We heard glass breaking, and then hoarse, heavy breathing", said Sister Mary George. "We were all in our beds and accounted for, so we knew something was up."

The intruder apparently fled when police sirens sounded in the distance.

Across the street from the convent, Radovan Caravan looked out the windows of his stakeout when he heard the sirens. "It's not often that things happen around here that warrant a siren or two," he said in a rather longwinded way.

Radovan, an avid sleuth, says there's absolutely no mistake about what he saw.

"There he was, Tiger Woods, plain as day, naked as a jaybird, running like a madman with his shirt and trousers bundled under his arm", Radovan said. "He ran right across the street, under the street lamp, and disappeared into the trees behind the church."

Sister Mary George is glad things turned out as they did.

"If things had gone much further", she remarked, "we'd all be in newspapers and television shows and people would be calling us all 'the Tiger Nuns'."

"That would have been dreadful", she giggled.

Police are combing the area, but it appears Tiger has disappeared once again, pursued by Radovan.

[Radovan's Caravan]

Watson,

This is a most perplexing affair, nothing here is quite what it appears to be.

It was immediately obvious to me that the injuries to Mr Woods were inflicted by his wife and not by impacts with the hydrant and the Oak tree. But the 'unconsiousness' claim bothers me. I cannot accept that his wife was responsible for this nor was this a consequence of any possible collision. Was this unfortunate state due to his medication as has been suggested? But surely this would have necessitated a longer stay at the hospital?

Then we have the released tapes of the 911 call. Strange how Mr Woods' 'neighbour' did not identify him, the world's most recogniseable man, during the phone conversation with the emergency crew. Strange, also, when repeatedly asked by the crew whether the victim was inside or outside the vehicle the answer was inaudible/garbled on three occasions. And strangest of all was how Woods' immediate neighbour revealed more than 72 hours after the incident that it was someone else who entered his property and made the call (so far, neither Woods' immediate neighbour nor the Good Samaritan have been identified).

This admission in one sense is not a surprise and in another sense is something of a shock. The diction of the caller was not of the kind that one would expect to hear within the confines of one of Florida's most exclusive gated communities. It would sit more comfortably in that place that has been used as the synonym for Elin Nordegren's fury - the ghetto. This and the other odd aspects of the call mentioned earlier suggest that the tape has been manufactured. Worse, it suggests that the local authorities and the police have been complicit in this act.

Of course, there may be a more innocent explanation for all this but I struggle to imagine what this might be. If the call was a simulation this opens up the possibility that the accident was as well. Forgive me if I am wrong here Watson but the 'after images' of the Oak Tree that was said to be the final point of impact of Woods' vehicle show no signs of disturbance to the circular flower bed surrounding it not were there any visible skid marks on the lawns and driveways that his car mounted.

There are also the photographs of the 'accident.' But these beg many questions. Who took them? And how did a scandal site based over 3,00 miles away in Los Angeles come to acquire them? Have you seen any pictures of the car with witnesses, paramedics, firemen, police in attendance as I have not? It maybe just a projection of mine but they appear to be images designed to reveal as little as possible and to mislead (like the shot with the patrol car in the background with its 'State Trooper' neon light full on).

Then there is the Scarlet Woman who goes public with details of her affair with Woods just days before (and it must be said here that the National Enquirer puts her in Melbourne with him and is standing by this claim - Woods' lawyers await their instructions) and then after the event runs to a disreputable divorce lawyer to deny everything. And of course there is the timing - on the eve of a golf tournament that Woods himself sponsors and was due to appear in.

Finally there is the way that all of this has been mishandled by the Woods' publicity machine and the saturation coverage this unfortunate incident has received. I have a growing feeling of unease that someone out there does not like him very much. However, at this juncture it must be said that neither do I and that I have no qualms in also saying that he richly deserved the thrashing meted out to him (well, probably at least).

However, as nothing in this case is as it seems to be I am beginning to wonder whether anything happened at all...

Yours ever,

Holmes

'The Golfer Who Drove Into A Tree' - Holmes's only three pipe problem

'The Golfer Who Drove Into A Tree' – Part II

Watson,

When you showed me my letter to you of the 1/12 at the Diogenes Club I perused some of its content with wry amusement.

For example, I am no longer of the opinion that the ‘Tiger’ deserved to be tamed by his club wielding wife – if only because I doubt very much (but perhaps not entirely) whether Mr E T Woods was the object of spousal fury in the early hours of Friday 27th November (more likely, possibly, that he was the victim of more extreme clinical violence somewhere around that time but this remains to be seen).

Whilst conceitedly congratulating myself on seeing through the gossamer cover story of the 'Escapade in the Escalade' I walked right into the trap that Moriarty had set for me. The criminal mastermind purposefully contrived this fabrication to entice me to over-anticipate the next chapter in his false narrative (the one that might be appropriately entitled ‘Hell hath no fury…’). At this juncture please allow me to recover a modicum of my dignity (or should that read vanity?!) by quoting to you the last sentence of my missive:

‘However, as nothing in this case is as it seems to be I am beginning to wonder whether anything happened at all...’

I am absolutely convinced that this spectacular exercise in disinformation is the handiwork of the malevolent professor. Once again he has crafted a tale plausible enough for mass consumption and yet at the same time has riddled it with so many discrepancies, omissions and coincidences that it borders on self incrimination (a psychological device designed, no doubt, to keep his co conspirators in check). But what is this all about, why does it have to be this way and how will it all end?

Perhaps it would be helpful if we look elsewhere for clues to the answers to these pressing questions. In the midst of such an absorbing assignment it is all too easy to lose sight of similar episodes - even those that have happened in the recent past. Nothing is more forgettable than one’s last case.

A little unfortunate then that in this instance our perfect template happens to be the peculiar circumstances surrounding the demise of the reclusive music hall entertainer, Mr M J Jackson.

Yours ever,

Holmes

[Edmund]

l444ry really needs to post more often.

[Webbo]

Cut the crap and just tell us wtf you are on about.

[Radovan's Caravan]

'The Golfer Who Drove Into A Tree' – Part II

Watson,

When you showed me my letter to you of the 1/12 at the Diogenes Club I perused some of its content with wry amusement.

For example, I am no longer of the opinion that the ‘Tiger’ deserved to be tamed by his club wielding wife – if only because I doubt very much (but perhaps not entirely) whether Mr E T Woods was the object of spousal fury in the early hours of Friday 27th November (more likely, possibly, that he was the victim of more extreme clinical violence somewhere around that time but this remains to be seen).

Whilst conceitedly congratulating myself on seeing through the gossamer cover story of the 'Escapade in the Escalade' I walked right into the trap that Moriarty had set for me. The criminal mastermind purposefully contrived this fabrication to entice me to over-anticipate the next chapter in his false narrative (the one that might be appropriately entitled ‘Hell hath no fury…’). At this juncture please allow me to recover a modicum of my dignity (or should that read vanity?!) by quoting to you the last sentence of my missive:

‘However, as nothing in this case is as it seems to be I am beginning to wonder whether anything happened at all...’

I am absolutely convinced that this spectacular exercise in disinformation is the handiwork of the malevolent professor. Once again he has crafted a tale plausible enough for mass consumption and yet at the same time has riddled it with so many discrepancies, omissions and coincidences that it borders on self incrimination (a psychological device designed, no doubt, to keep his co conspirators in check). But what is this all about, why does it have to be this way and how will it all end?

Perhaps it would be helpful if we look elsewhere for clues to the answers to these pressing questions. In the midst of such an absorbing assignment it is all too easy to lose sight of similar episodes - even those that have happened in the recent past. Nothing is more forgettable than one’s last case.

A little unfortunate then that in this instance our perfect template happens to be the peculiar circumstances surrounding the demise of the reclusive music hall entertainer, Mr M J Jackson.

Yours ever,

Holmes

'The Golfer Who Drove Into A Tree' – Part III

My Dear Holmes,

Sincere apologies for my tardiness in replying to your letter of the 22/12 but what with the practice and the general madness at this time of year I haven't been able to give your observations the undivided attention of my second rate mind (just as well my skin is thicker than rhino hide!).

Before playing devil's advocate vis a vis your latest deductions I would like to offer some support for your pronouncements in your earlier correspondence on this matter. There are so many discrepancies in the accounts re events in the early hours of the 27/11 in Isleworth Fla provided by the Woods' (purported?) neighbours and principal witnesses, the Adams family (and their hired shyster Bill Sharpe), that a single weighty tome devoted entirely to listing and assessing their dubious claims and conflicting recollections* would scarce do the subject justice.

As a result I, too, am increasingly of the opinion that the central elements of this incident are largely fictitious et ergo, by extension, am now sceptically predisposed to all official coverage of the Woods' affair. This unrelenting saga is some sort of smoke and mirrors operation designed to confuse a public that is inclined to place a higher value on the soi disant authority of the press than it does on its own instincts. An unintentional segue, I assure you, to your 'template' - the demise of the great music hall artiste, Mr Michael Joseph Jackson.

I do see certain obvious parallels here with the Woods affair. There were many inconsistencies in the reporting of the immediate circumstances surrounding Jackson's death and about his misuse of prescription drugs. And, if I remember correctly, there were a number of discrepancies in coverage of the autopsy (or should that read autopsies - was the private one ever conducted?) and the results of toxicology tests. I am pretty sure there was even some confusion about when and where he was to be buried (although this was later resolved but no doubt you would qualify that with an adverb like 'seemingly').

However, save the prescription medication issue, I fail to see how in specifics the Jackson case sheds any light on the matter at hand (unless Woods has been done in - are you suggesting that?). I am certain though, that you will soon enlighten me on this score. I sense an invitation to partake of Mrs Hudson's muffins at 221b Baker Street is imminent.

Here are some odds and ends for the files:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/29/t...i_n_372977.html

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/12/03/tiger.woo...tion=cnn_latest

http://www.fox61.com/sports/orl-tiger-wood...853992.htmlpage

http://www.fox61.com/sports/orl-tiger-wood...5570772.mp3file

Yours ever,

Watson

PS Today is Mr Woods' 34th birthday (or should that read, Today would have been Woods' 34th birthday?).

*The Adams family (are they for real or are they the creation of a low grade Machiavelli with a warped sense of humour?) put into circulation four separate accounts as to who was present at 6342 Deacon Circle in the early hours of the 27/11.

(I) The 'official' police interview (conducted on Monday 30/11) revealed that it was Jarius Adams and his sister, Mrs Kimberly Harris who were in residence at the time of the incident.

(II) The press conference hosted by the Adams’ attorney the following day stated that there were three people present at that time: Mrs Linda Adams and her two sons Jarius Lavar Adams and Jerome Adams Jnr (so what happens to daughter Kimberly's testimony?).

(III) Other reports state that a (Dr) Jerome Roberts Snr, a physician, was also there (the householder in these accounts, although a medical register gives a different address for him in Orlando) but played no part in proceedings. One might be forgiven for thinking his medical skills may have proved useful.

(IV) Several outlets revised initial statements that it was either Jarius or Jerome who made the 911 call and attributed it to an as yet unidentified male who was in the Adams property at the time.

A further news conference that was to have been hosted on the 2/12 by Christian Conrad (a partner in Bill Sharpes' law firm) to clarify point (IV) and other matters did not materialise. The Adams family also pulled out of an interview with Larry King - make of that what I'm sure you will...…

[skinnydipper]

'The Golfer Who Drove Into A Tree' – Part III

My Dear Holmes,

Sincere apologies for my tardiness in replying to your letter of the 22/12 but what with the practice and the general madness at this time of year I haven't been able to give your observations the undivided attention of my second rate mind (just as well my skin is thicker than rhino hide!).

Before playing devil's advocate vis a vis your latest deductions I would like to offer some support for your pronouncements in your earlier correspondence on this matter. There are so many discrepancies in the accounts re events in the early hours of the 27/11 in Isleworth Fla provided by the Woods' (purported?) neighbours and principal witnesses, the Adams family (and their hired shyster Bill Sharpe), that a single weighty tome devoted entirely to listing and assessing their dubious claims and conflicting recollections* would scarce do the subject justice.

As a result I, too, am increasingly of the opinion that the central elements of this incident are largely fictitious et ergo, by extension, am now sceptically predisposed to all official coverage of the Woods' affair. This unrelenting saga is some sort of smoke and mirrors operation designed to confuse a public that is inclined to place a higher value on the soi disant authority of the press than it does on its own instincts. An unintentional segue, I assure you, to your 'template' - the demise of the great music hall artiste, Mr Michael Joseph Jackson.

I do see certain obvious parallels here with the Woods affair. There were many inconsistencies in the reporting of the immediate circumstances surrounding Jackson's death and about his misuse of prescription drugs. And, if I remember correctly, there were a number of discrepancies in coverage of the autopsy (or should that read autopsies - was the private one ever conducted?) and the results of toxicology tests. I am pretty sure there was even some confusion about when and where he was to be buried (although this was later resolved but no doubt you would qualify that with an adverb like 'seemingly').

However, save the prescription medication issue, I fail to see how in specifics the Jackson case sheds any light on the matter at hand (unless Woods has been done in - are you suggesting that?). I am certain though, that you will soon enlighten me on this score. I sense an invitation to partake of Mrs Hudson's muffins at 221b Baker Street is imminent.

Here are some odds and ends for the files:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/29/t...i_n_372977.html

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/12/03/tiger.woo...tion=cnn_latest

http://www.fox61.com/sports/orl-tiger-wood...853992.htmlpage

http://www.fox61.com/sports/orl-tiger-wood...5570772.mp3file

Yours ever,

Watson

PS Today is Mr Woods' 34th birthday (or should that read, Today would have been Woods' 34th birthday?).

*The Adams family (are they for real or are they the creation of a low grade Machiavelli with a warped sense of humour?) put into circulation four separate accounts as to who was present at 6342 Deacon Circle in the early hours of the 27/11.

(I) The 'official' police interview (conducted on Monday 30/11) revealed that it was Jarius Adams and his sister, Mrs Kimberly Harris who were in residence at the time of the incident.

(II) The press conference hosted by the Adams' attorney the following day stated that there were three people present at that time: Mrs Linda Adams and her two sons Jarius Lavar Adams and Jerome Adams Jnr (so what happens to daughter Kimberly's testimony?).

(III) Other reports state that a (Dr) Jerome Roberts Snr, a physician, was also there (the householder in these accounts, although a medical register gives a different address for him in Orlando) but played no part in proceedings. One might be forgiven for thinking his medical skills may have proved useful.

(IV) Several outlets revised initial statements that it was either Jarius or Jerome who made the 911 call and attributed it to an as yet unidentified male who was in the Adams property at the time.

A further news conference that was to have been hosted on the 2/12 by Christian Conrad (a partner in Bill Sharpes' law firm) to clarify point (IV) and other matters did not materialise. The Adams family also pulled out of an interview with Larry King - make of that what I'm sure you will...…

I'm still none the wiser

However, I see watertight mitigation re insanity should you ever suffer a mishap with the authorities whilst travelling in China