Haydos Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Tilley's funny, you're boring. Pretty sure in this case there's a fine line between funny and sad. I have no problem with it, but when it's all the time on every thread that pops up? It's only cuz the club's so frustrating anyway, hence wanting to hear actual opinions about stuff. Jeff Schlupp for messiah
Kitchandro Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Tilley's funny, you're boring. The difference between Tilley and yourself is that most people generally know Tilley's on the wind-up and if they don't then they soon work it out. You in contrast end up in just as many, if not more, arguments because you seem to take offence and almost everyone's views of our players that don't match up with yours and then rant on for pages spouting indignant, self-righteous prose about how right you are and how biased or overly emotive everyone else is being. I'd rather the former. You're not thick, some of what you say makes sense and I do agree with some of it. But you remind me of me at your age - you massively need to lighten up. No he's not funny he's boring. Tell me what's so funny about him? Wow, he talks shit on purpose, comedy genius. Don't see why he should be such a hero. His wumming isn't obvious enough. I have in fact read some things he's said and agreed with them. So how do you know when he's being serious or not? Maybe he just is stupid and talking shit. Sadly, a lot of what he says is in fact what a lot of other people say. Such as 'Howard's a useless lump'. How many times have I heard that over the last few years? So excuse me if I just think he's another thick Leicester fan who doesn't know what he's talking about. If he wants to Wum he should fook off to 606. Just because he's trying to be funny does not make him so. I'll lighten up when he says something that actually is funny, and isn't just annoying.
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 No he's not funny he's boring. So excuse me if I just think he's another thick Leicester fan who doesn't know what he's talking about. If he wants to Wum he should fook off to 606. Just because he's trying to be funny does not make him so. I'll lighten up when he says something that actually is funny, and isn't just annoying. He's more amusing than you. You just abuse those with whom you disagree. Your love fests with many of the current shower of shite are just embarrassing. whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh Howard and Fryatt aren't going to love you because of all this support you give them on here. Why don't you ask to be their friend via Facebook?
Kitchandro Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 He's more amusing than you. You just abuse those with whom you disagree. Your love fests with many of the current shower of shite are just embarrassing. whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh Howard and Fryatt aren't going to love you because of all this support you give them on here. Why don't you ask to be their friend via Facebook? Well I don't claim to be amusing, but he still aint funnier than me. I abuse those who talk shit. There are some things that can be argued with. There are other 'opinions' though that have no credibility whatsoever. And I'm not about to pretend that I think that they do have some credibility. You know what's embarrassing; booing and slating your own players. There's been too much of that this season, and it's not warranted. Hate your own players if you like, but I'm not going to pretend I like you either.
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Ooh get you. There is nothing wrong with praising/discussing/slating players on a website, there would be no reason in websites were we all to be disciples of the cult of positive thought like you. And yet again those whose opinions you disagree are talking shit. I'm sure you don't talk to people like that in the pub. When Fryatt goes elsewhere will you no longer be his friend on facebook? ;-)
Kitchandro Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Ooh get you. There is nothing wrong with praising/discussing/slating players on a website, there would be no reason in websites were we all to be disciples of the cult of positive thought like you. And yet again those whose opinions you disagree are talking shit. I'm sure you don't talk to people like that in the pub. When Fryatt goes elsewhere will you no longer be his friend on facebook? ;-) Firstly, the manner in which you post is what makes me think you're a dick. I'm not in the being positive camp, but I can be fair. I do not have favourites and villains, I accept what players/managers have done right and what they have done wrong. You however, are completely biased and base your opinions on who you like and who you don't like. So if you want to take the piss, as I've said that's your right but realise that I think you're a willy puller. I do not think everyone who disagrees with me is talking shit. But some people's opinions are just ill-judged and ill-informed. I'm sure you would be just as quick to tell me I was talking shit if I said something you thought was really stupid. And don't deny that, at least be honest. Get down off your high horse and admit it. You know Hitler had opinions too - who here's gonna tell me he wasn't talking shit? And there you see my point - not every opinion is as reasonable as others.
Fox You Forest Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Can't you both give it a rest, Jesus. It's the same shit over and over again.
The Doctor Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Given a run in the team, I'm still confident Robbie can net that many at least. think we're talking about goals for us here, not own goals.
Donut Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 there arent all that many players FULL STOP who will get 20 league goals this season in any team. If you could destroy defences to the extent you were bagging that many goals..............frankly you wouldnt be playing for Leicester.
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 dick and willy puller? And Hitler in a football thread. You've lost the thread.
hackneyfox Posted 23 November 2010 Posted 23 November 2010 Can't you both give it a rest, Jesus. It's the same shit over and over again. Sorry, I was just having a bit of fun
Finnegan Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 You know Hitler had opinions too - who here's gonna tell me he wasn't talking shit? And there you see my point - not every opinion is as reasonable as others. Oooooh. He Godwin'd! Loss by default, ding, ding!
The Doctor Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 Oooooh. He Godwin'd! Loss by default, ding, ding! were you watching QI on dave last night by any chance?
Finnegan Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 No. As fox123 takes joy in pointing out, I'm a nerd. An internet meme has to be REALLY old to get on TV.
The Doctor Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 just seemed a bit of a too much of a coincidence that they'd talk about it in a QI repeat on night and you'd mention it the following morning. edit: does that make any sense at all? Think i might have gone and confused myself.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 Who's funnier, Tilley or Kitchandro? There's only one way to find out...
Wymsey Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 Who's funnier, Tilley or Kitchandro? There's only one way to find out... Tilley, Kitchandro more serious no offence
Finnegan Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 Only Wymsey could take that on board and actually answer it seriously.
Wymsey Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 Only Wymsey could take that on board and actually answer it seriously. Probably many others would agree with me but don't have the bullocks to say it.
Finnegan Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 ... no... no, Wymsey. You don't have "the bollocks," it's just everybody else would have realised it was a ridiculous, rhetorical question meant as a joke. You are a complete weapon, son.
Wymsey Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 ... no... no, Wymsey. You don't have "the bollocks," it's just everybody else would have realised it was a ridiculous, rhetorical question meant as a joke. You are a complete weapon, son. I knew that but i just wanted to show off as usual and 'unsteady' the ship
Finnegan Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 I knew that but i just wanted to show off as usual and 'unsteady' the ship ... what?
Finnegan Posted 24 November 2010 Posted 24 November 2010 I know what i am saying, its just you lot <_< Yeah... no. You are a comedy hero, Wymsey. Just unfortunately for you it's entirely accidental.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.