sdb Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Where's Bruma?? Can't believe Vassell starting ahead of Waghorn again. Come on Leicester!!! :scarf:
FoxyPV Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 6-0 thrashing. Norwich will be so disheartened by the defeat that they will freefall to mid-table mediocrity and we push forward and claim a place in the playoffs!
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Was thinking about 20 mins ago that there was something happening tonight and for 5 minutes I couldn't for the life of me remember what it was, I log on here and see the match thread and suddenly everything clicks into place! Personally going with a 3-0 city here, I can feel it in me bones. Arrr i hope your right Padster :thumbsup:
Haydos Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 why arent gally and dyer starting 2 of our best players this season and why change a winning formula Wrong.
Salieri Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Anyone know the Norwich line up? Don't know much about their team other than that big ****er up front, Holt? and Hoolahan is a tidy player.
buzzy Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Did you or the other guy go to the game on Saturday? If not, pipe down cos he actually had a good game and you'd be talking bollocks. so you're saying oakley has a couple of good games he should keep is place for christ sakes oakley is shit every time i have seen him play. gallagher is a better player on the wing with wellens and king in the middle with dyer on the other wing if he is playing 442. even waghorn instead if oakley in fact anyone instead of oakley
nickelbyfox Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Anyone know the Norwich line up? Don't know much about their team other than that big ****er up front, Holt? and Hoolahan is a tidy player. City: Ruddy, Martin, Whitbread, Crofts, Holt ©, Surman, Hoolahan, Fox, Wilbraham, Ward, Tierney. City subs: Rudd, Drury, Edwards, Jackson, Lansbury, Smith, McNamee. Wilbraham in for Lansbury, Whitbread fit to play after late assessment
Salieri Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 City: Ruddy, Martin, Whitbread, Crofts, Holt ©, Surman, Hoolahan, Fox, Wilbraham, Ward, Tierney. City subs: Rudd, Drury, Edwards, Jackson, Lansbury, Smith, McNamee. Wilbraham in for Lansbury, Whitbread fit to play after late assessment Cheers.
Guest bennytwohats Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Hmmm, not too fond of playing this way on paper - i wasn't at the game so i will keep an open mind til i've actually seen us play like this. That said, individually Gally is hands down better than Oakley an has been playing well so not sure why we want to drop him. Lack of width and Berner isn't gonna be able to get up and down the whole game like Naughton will so i don't see much of a threat from us that side. Seems that maybe we're setting up for a bit more of a physical game tonight? Also, what's up with Bruma? I actually thought he was one of our better players against Cov and by all accounts he was a beast on saturday so looked forward to seeing him again. Not looking forward to having to deal with the sarcastic clapping and shouting of Weale (Logan?) every time he gets the ball again. I'm sure there are others but there is a big group of morons of the highest calibre that sit at the back of sk4 and i really can't stand the shit that they come out with.
StanSP Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 so you're saying oakley has a couple of good games he should keep is place for christ sakes oakley is shit every time i have seen him play. gallagher is a better player on the wing with wellens and king in the middle with dyer on the other wing if he is playing 442. even waghorn instead if oakley in fact anyone instead of oakley Yes. If Oakley's on form, why drop him? If everyone who had a shit game got dropped, there'd always be more players on the bench than on the flippin pitch, and that goes for every club, not just Leicester.
Guest bennytwohats Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Can't believe Vassell starting ahead of Waghorn again. After his clinical display of finishing on saturday? Don't know why Vassell gets grief on here - not had his best games recently but he's been quality for us.
sdb Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 After his clinical display of finishing on saturday? Don't know why Vassell gets grief on here - not had his best games recently but he's been quality for us. I'd rather have a slightly rusty striker working the centre backs and giving us options, than a lazy sod who does jack shit most of the time.
Ric Flair Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Interesting team given we're at home but QPR also had 2 very lethal wingers and we stifled them with the 4-1-3-2 and I wonder whether Sven is thinking the same with Hoolahan and Crofts. Bit of a shame thinking that way given our home form and Gallagher's form at home especially, but I do like us with a player up top with The Yak and let's see what we can do. Schlupp must be on cloud nine being in the squad, let's take some bodies.
broughtonblue Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 I'd rather have a slightly rusty striker working the centre backs and giving us options, than a lazy sod who does jack shit most of the time. Who you having a go at now? Yak?
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Did you or the other guy go to the game on Saturday? If not, pipe down cos he actually had a good game and you'd be talking bollocks. Listen to StanSP boys he makes sense and gets behind all Leicester City players - not just his favourites!!!!! Come on City
colbo68 Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Just hoping that the yak isn't the only one to get chances And that we take them!!!
buzzy Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Yes. If Oakley's on form, why drop him? If everyone who had a shit game got dropped, there'd always be more players on the bench than on the flippin pitch, and that goes for every club, not just Leicester. question- are you one of the leicester fans who slag of howard please reply
The Padster Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Wonder who will be chief whipping boy on here tonight, Oakley or Ricardo? Probably Schlupp because he missed a sitter in the dying seconds. <_<
sdb Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Who you having a go at now? Yak? No, Vassel. Follow the thread.
broughtonblue Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 Wonder who will be chief whipping boy on here tonight, Oakley or Ricardo? No one, we will win convincingly so the good mood and vibes will be flowing again
broughtonblue Posted 8 March 2011 Posted 8 March 2011 No, Vassel. Follow the thread. Knew really, just clarifying it for others!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.