Dan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Not a chance on earth, the more I think of Sven's reign the more I think that the longer he was here, the more damage he was doing. Bet anyone a tenner we have more points after 13 games this season.
5waller5 Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Not a chance on earth, the more I think of Sven's reign the more I think that the longer he was here, the more damage he was doing. Bet anyone a tenner we have more points after 13 games this season. It's an interesting bet ...... For the sake of a tenner I'll take you up on it .... Kinda hope i don't win as i don't actually want to ..... but I do think it's an interesting bet that'll put some added spice into those 13 games!!!!!
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Pearson's points after 13 games in his 3 Championship seasons 21 (Leicester) 13 (Leicester 12) 21 (Leicester 19)
5waller5 Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Pearson's points after 13 games in his 3 Championship seasons 21 (Leicester) 13 (Leicester 12) 21 (Leicester 19) I'm being thick .... what did we have in Sven's first 13? 19 points?
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Pearson's points after 13 games in his 3 Championship seasons 21 (Leicester) 13 (Leicester 12) 21 (Leicester 19) Are you a statiscian by trade Fleckney?
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Are you a statiscian by trade Fleckney? Nope. I just think we can learn things from facts. Edited to add a certain Nigel Pearson adores stats.
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 I'm being thick .... what did we have in Sven's first 13? 19 points? Yup. I've put them in chronological order.
kingfox Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 We would be in the Premier League with 90 million in our pockets. Then we would have managed to sign Koren, Heskey, Chester and Maynard.
Lambert09 Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 If the lads didn't go to la manga and get jiggy with it we would be in the champions league by now.
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Nope. I just think we can learn things from facts. Edited to add a certain Nigel Pearson adores stats. Christ! He's gotta drop Dyer now then surely?
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Christ! He's gotta drop Dyer now then surely? He drops him more often than his critics care to acknowledge (Pearson's critics that is). Pearson is more neurotic over fitness stats and distance covered stats, again Pearson knows that Beckford covers more ground than many of his team mates (this was acknowledged in an interview) so likes that aspect of Jermaine's play. All the players wear GPS during play and heart monitors at home so he can monitor their fitness at all times. He may be viewed as being a bit backwards when it comes to tactics but he's very on the ball when it comes to using technology.
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 He drops him more often than his critics care to acknowledge (Pearson's critics that is). Pearson is more neurotic over fitness stats and distance covered stats, again Pearson knows that Beckford covers more ground than many of his team mates (this was acknowledged in an interview) so likes that aspect of Jermaine's play. All the players wear GPS during play and heart monitors at home so he can monitor their fitness at all times. He may be viewed as being a bit backwards when it comes to tactics but he's very on the ball when it comes to using technology. What I'm saying is, if Pearson is so hung up on stats, then he's gotta drop Dyer. As you've stated, Lloyds stats make orrible reading. I mean drop him, period... Do you think he will? In fact, go the whole hog and sell him?
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 What I'm saying is, if Pearson is so hung up on stats, then he's gotta drop Dyer. As you've stated, Lloyds stats make orrible reading. I mean drop him, period... Do you think he will? In fact, go the whole hog and sell him? I don't think anyone will be willing to pay him what we are going to be paying him for the next 3 years. The fact the only serious interest came from the division below suggests we may well be stuck with him for some time yet.
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 I don't think anyone will be willing to pay him what we are going to be paying him for the next 3 years. The fact the only serious interest came from the division below suggests we may well be stuck with him for some time yet. Or that Pearson, despite his stats, sees something in him? I guess we'll see on opening day and beyond...
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Or that Pearson, despite his stats, sees something in him? I guess we'll see on opening day and beyond... Trust me, it's because some twat gave him a contract extension and substantial pay rise that he'll be here for the next 3 years.
5waller5 Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 So an average of NP's 3 seasons 55/3 = 18.33 .... needs to beat 19. Interesting bet!!!!
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Trust me, it's because some twat gave him a contract extension and substantial pay rise that he'll be here for the next 3 years. Do you know that Pearson don't rate him Fleckney? Fair enough if you do, but spill....
5waller5 Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 He drops him more often than his critics care to acknowledge (Pearson's critics that is). Pearson is more neurotic over fitness stats and distance covered stats, again Pearson knows that Beckford covers more ground than many of his team mates (this was acknowledged in an interview) so likes that aspect of Jermaine's play. All the players wear GPS during play and heart monitors at home so he can monitor their fitness at all times. He may be viewed as being a bit backwards when it comes to tactics but he's very on the ball when it comes to using technology. Interesting fact for the Beckford critics!
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 I'm not friends with Mr Pearson, I am annoyed that Dyer was rewarded with an 'improved' 5 year contract by Sousa.
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 I'm not friends with Mr Pearson, I am annoyed that Dyer was rewarded with an 'improved' 5 year contract by Sousa. So, stats aside, let's just wait and see if Nige still fancies him and plays him. Fair enough?
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 So, stats aside, let's just wait and see if Nige still fancies him and plays him. Fair enough? No. If Nige continues to play him, my dislike of both men will only grow.
Mark_w Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Interesting fact for the Beckford critics! Sure he works hard but he doesn't score many goals. You're just one of these prats who likes any player that runs around a lot.
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 No. If Nige continues to play him, my dislike of both men will only grow. Ok Well I tried to be fair based upon what you'd said. Tis your prerogative Mike.
fleckneymike Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 Ok Well I tried to be fair based upon what you'd said. Tis your prerogative Mike. I cannot fault your 50 shades of beige.
Guest Col city fan Posted 6 August 2012 Posted 6 August 2012 I cannot fault your 50 shades of beige. No offence meant Mike, your stats are impressive to be fair. All I've said is (and this really is all I've said), that Pearson must surely be aware of how bad those stats are and, by definition, would not choose to play Lloyd very much. If he DOES, then this may dilute your argument somewhat. Personally, and to conclude, I believe Lloyd has a part to play this season and wouldn't be at all surprised if he's in the starting 11 against the Borough. I may be wrong, I sometimes am. Anyway, been a good discussion with you mate.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.