Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

Is the toilet seat really the dirtiest place in the home?

Recommended Posts

Posted

BBC

The toilet seat has acquired an unfair reputation as the dirtiest item in the average household. But scientists say there are far filthier places in our house, some of them where we least expect.

Would you chop your vegetables on your toilet seat? I think pretty much all of us would say No. But maybe we should think again.

Dr Chuck Gerba, professor of microbiology at the University of Arizona, studies how diseases are transferred through the environment. This involves swabbing household items and measuring how many bacteria - and what sort - develop.

He particularly looks for faecal bacteria such as E.coli and staphylococcus aureus.

His studies have found that on the average toilet seat there are 50 bacteria per square inch.

A new benchmark

The toilet seat is now regularly used as a unit of dirt.

"Now hear this! Your cellphone is as dirty as a toilet seat," writes the New York Post.

"Which? found that the keyboards at its London offices contained up to five times more germs than a toilet seat," reports the Daily Mail.

"Keyboards can carry more than 200 times as many bacteria as a toilet seat," says USA Today.

"It's one of the cleanest things you'll run across in terms of micro-organisms," he says. "It's our gold standard - there are not many things cleaner than a toilet seat when it comes to germs."

We should be more worried about other household items, it seems.

"Usually there are about 200 times more faecal bacteria on the average cutting board than on a toilet seat," he says.

In the kitchen it doesn't necessarily get there through actual contact with faeces. It comes via raw meat products or the viscera from inside of the animal, where a lot of the faecal bacteria originate.

Would Gerba be more inclined to chop his vegetables on a toilet seat then?

"It would seem a safer place," he says. "Not that I would recommend it, but you might treat your cutting board a bit more like you do your toilet seat."

It's because we all fear the dirtiness of the toilet seat so much that we regularly clean it, so perhaps this is the course of action we need to take with our chopping boards.

But the filthiest culprit in our homes is the kitchen sponge or cloth.

According to Gerba, there are about 10 million bacteria per square inch on a sponge, and a million on a dishcloth.

In other words, a kitchen sponge is 200,000 times dirtier than a toilet seat, and a dishcloth is 20,000 times dirtier.

This is the same the world over.

"Always the dirtiest thing by far is the kitchen sponge," says John Oxford, professor of virology at the University of London and chair of the Hygiene Council - an international body that compares hygiene standards across the world.

Its latest study examines samples from homes in nine different countries, and finds that 21% of "visibly clean" kitchen cloths actually have high levels of contamination. The cloths also fail the bacterial test which looks for E.coli.

The study identifies faecal bacteria in other places around the home, and this varies from one country to another.

Saudi Arabia has the dirtiest fridges, with 95% of the fridges in the study failing the bacteriology test for E.coli. And in South Africa, the dirtiest item is the seal in the bath, with almost two-thirds with unsatisfactory levels of E.coli and 40% for mould.

"It's always a bit delicate which countries are the worst," says Oxford.

"We found that countries like Australia and particularly Canada are high up on the hygiene list... Countries near the bottom are fairly routinely, unfortunately, India and Malaysia."

What about away from our homes? Gerba says the office is particularly bad.

"Many people don't realise they're talking dirty every time they pick up their phone, because they never clean it. "The average desktop has 400 times more bacteria than on a toilet seat."

Beware the supermarket too.

"Shopping trolleys are really bad," warns Gerba. What's more, about half of reusable shopping bags have faecal bacteria in them.

"Some people have more faecal bacteria in their grocery bag than in their underwear, because they at least wash that."

So what does this actually mean for us in terms of health risks?

"These numbers of bacteria, particularly for E.coli, are huge," says Oxford.

"E.coli is an indicator bacterium. It may not itself cause horrible disease, but it indicates faeces is around and that might contain other organisms like salmonella and shigella which really are virulently pathogenic."

But we all touch these perhaps startlingly dirty things every day, and on the whole we don't get constantly ill.

"We're jolly lucky that as we've evolved over two million years, we have a whole set of genes whose only function is to get the immune system in action," says Oxford.

"All of us, in all these countries we have gone to, rely on Lady Luck too much, keeping our fingers crossed or sitting on our hands. In a modern scientific society, what we want is people to realise there's a problem here and take action."

Disclaimer: Charlotte Pritchard and the BBC do not recommend chopping any sort of food on your toilet seat.

Posted

davieG you have an obsession with toilet seats.

Posted

Were the people found with shit molecules in their shopping bag coming back from walking a dog? PLEASE don't reuse those bags. They shouldn't be in circulation.

I suppose if you had a poo before going shopping the molecules of poo from wiping your arse would have transferred to your hands and then sprinkled into the bag as you put your shopping in.

Lovely.

Posted

So everything is covered in shit and germs. Get over it people.

Posted

How many of you do up your trouser zip and belt buckle before washing your hands? Faecal central!

So let me get this right....after you've been for a dump, whether at work or you've been caught short whilst you're out somewhere(obviously when you're at home this would be ok), you walk out of the cubicle like a penguin to the wash basin, with your tackle swinging about for all to see, wash & dry your hands, THEN pull your ****ing trousers up?!

Posted

So let me get this right....after you've been for a dump, whether at work or you've been caught short whilst you're out somewhere(obviously when you're at home this would be ok), you walk out of the cubicle like a penguin to the wash basin, with your tackle swinging about for all to see, wash & dry your hands, THEN pull your ****ing trousers up?!

What's wrong with that? :unsure:

:D

Posted

So let me get this right....after you've been for a dump, whether at work or you've been caught short whilst you're out somewhere(obviously when you're at home this would be ok), you walk out of the cubicle like a penguin to the wash basin, with your tackle swinging about for all to see, wash & dry your hands, THEN pull your ****ing trousers up?!

Yeah but you just keg any witnesses so they feel as daft

Posted

So let me get this right....after you've been for a dump, whether at work or you've been caught short whilst you're out somewhere(obviously when you're at home this would be ok), you walk out of the cubicle like a penguin to the wash basin, with your tackle swinging about for all to see, wash & dry your hands, THEN pull your ****ing trousers up?!

No, of course not but WC cubicles without an internal WHB you have to do up before you go out so they get contaminated. Toilets designed for disabled folk are more hygienic because the WHB is in with the WC.

Posted

That must be OrkneyFox, he lets his snake roam freely in public toilets quite regularly apparently...

Unfortunately I haven't frightened any young ladies with my python for quite some time now!

Posted

No, of course not but WC cubicles without an internal WHB you have to do up before you go out so they get contaminated. Toilets designed for disabled folk are more hygienic because the WHB is in with the WC.

It was very much tongue in cheek bud.

Posted

It was very much tongue in cheek bud.

That would be a big faecal moment.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...