Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
norscot fox

Why were we not in running to sign Boyd

Recommended Posts

Guest ttfn

Boyd over two left feet Dyer all day long.

But what would Boyd give us that we don't already have? Pearson just chooses not to use Gallagher. Knockaert is not dissimilar but twice the player already that Boyd will ever be.

He's a flat-track bully. Take one look at his goalscoring record over the past 3 years and try to argue otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Boyd was so ****ing wonderful, he wouldnt have been at Peterborough for the last 300 years.

He had a good game yesterday, so ****ing what? Do we really have to go through the 'why did we not sign ......' every time we lose a game?

Getting sick of people continuously doing it.

''So, Frazier Campbell scored again'

'George Boyd woud have been a good signing'

'Why didnt we get Spearing in loan?'

'Simon Cox would have been deadly at this level'

Etc etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Boyd was so ****ing wonderful, he wouldnt have been at Peterborough for the last 300 years.

He had a good game yesterday, so ****ing what? Do we really have to go through the 'why did we not sign ......' every time we lose a game?

Getting sick of people continuously doing it.

''So, Frazier Campbell scored again'

'George Boyd woud have been a good signing'

'Why didnt we get Spearing in loan?'

'Simon Cox would have been deadly at this level'

Etc etc etc

Chris Wood is pretty decent.

But because we've signed him, someone else who we didn't sign would be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...