MrSpaM Posted 16 December 2013 Posted 16 December 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25397167 Bit surprising since he's got the best win / loss record they've had since 1992, guess the owners expected them to be top
EnderbyFox Posted 16 December 2013 Posted 16 December 2013 Does seem slightly hasty, then again he has spent over 100M, and losing 6-0 and 5-0 is unacceptable. Not to mention the 3-0 loss to West Ham at home!
foxfanazer Posted 16 December 2013 Posted 16 December 2013 Think it's more the manner of the losses than his win ratio. The West Ham, man city and Liverpool results have ruined him.
The Horse's Mouth Posted 16 December 2013 Posted 16 December 2013 He needed time to let it gel, looks like it wasn't given that and it's not exactly like they're miles away from top 4. I honestly don't know who can "save" them.
Donut Posted 16 December 2013 Posted 16 December 2013 Replacing a £90 million player is hard, even when you have £90 million. Does that make any sense? Bale was digging Spurs out of games single handedly last season.
purpleronnie Posted 16 December 2013 Posted 16 December 2013 I wonder why the chairman of all these clubs who sack their managers always seem to escape any sacking.
Corky Posted 18 December 2013 Posted 18 December 2013 Does seem slightly hasty, then again he has spent over 100M, and losing 6-0 and 5-0 is unacceptable. Not to mention the 3-0 loss to West Ham at home! Getting better, only 1-2 tonight.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.