Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
kingfox

Schlupp Can't Pass A Ball

Recommended Posts

Posted

This thread has shown already and will continue to show the way in which people will interpret stats to make an argument.

Rest assured, if Cambiasso had been top of the list, the typical comment would have probably been along the lines of 'there ya go, told ya so'. Because he's not, few will look at the stats and think 'oh, thats interesting, I wasn't expecting that'. Instead, it will be the type of pass that is defended.

 

Yeah, thats true, but the point is valid. Trying to make things happen is more difficult than retaining possession square.

 

If we had a midfield where everyone had 100% pass completion, we could be the most potent team in history, or more likely spend the whole game going sideways.

 

A cross is a hopeful pass with no real target, its just put into a good area for someone to attack. Its completion rate is going to be way down.

Posted

This thread has shown already and will continue to show the way in which people will interpret stats to make an argument.

Rest assured, if Cambiasso had been top of the list, the typical comment would have probably been along the lines of 'there ya go, told ya so'. Because he's not, few will look at the stats and think 'oh, thats interesting, I wasn't expecting that'. Instead, it will be the type of pass that is defended.

 

Isn't that what statistics are there for though? Some are quite clearcut, like goals per game or goals per time on the field, while others, such as pass success, are open to more interpretation.

 

I'm not going to lie, I was a bit surprised he was lower than a lot of our players and as low as that. 

 

Are we seriously saying, though, that Liam Moore, Wes Morgan and Dean Hammond are better passers of the ball than Cambiasso? Pass success has to be interpreted. Sure, Kingy is good at keeping the ball, by far the best in our team. However, how often does he try a through ball, a ball that turns the defence or a ball that really tries to attack the opposition? Could you see someone like Drinkwater playing the pass Mahrez did for our goal on Tuesday? The team need people who will take risks with their passing, as well as those who will help to retain the ball. Again it's about balance. Football is about balance. We haven't found it yet in this league, if we did we would be doing a lot better than we currently are.

 

Not every player needs to make that kind of pass and it's good to have those who can keep possession very well. I thought Cambiasso's pass success rate would be higher, so I am surprised. Doesn't mean I'm now going to think he's rubbish!

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Isn't that what statistics are there for though? Some are quite clearcut, like goals per game or goals per time on the field, while others, such as pass success, are open to more interpretation.

I'm not going to lie, I was a bit surprised he was lower than a lot of our players and as low as that.

Are we seriously saying, though, that Liam Moore, Wes Morgan and Dean Hammond are better passers of the ball than Cambiasso? Pass success has to be interpreted. Sure, Kingy is good at keeping the ball, by far the best in our team. However, how often does he try a through ball, a ball that turns the defence or a ball that really tries to attack the opposition? Could you see someone like Drinkwater playing the pass Mahrez did for our goal on Tuesday? The team need people who will take risks with their passing, as well as those who will help to retain the ball. Again it's about balance. Football is about balance. We haven't found it yet in this league, if we did we would be doing a lot better than we currently are.

Not every player needs to make that kind of pass and it's good to have those who can keep possession very well. I thought Cambiasso's pass success rate would be higher, so I am surprised. Doesn't mean I'm now going to think he's rubbish!

lol

My point was how it would have been if the stats had been the other way round. Ie if he had the best success rate!

I'd have been slaughtered!

lol

Posted

lol

My point was how it would have been if the stats had been the other way round. Ie if he had the best success rate!

I'd have been slaughtered!

lol

 

Probably but you're used to that by now  :xmaslaugh:

 

No, in all seriousness I was surprised but I still think you can't just ignore interpretation of stats. What's your interpretation of it?

 

I did, however, expect King to be top because of the way he plays and the type of role he has when he plays.

 

My main point is that the OP claimed Schlupp is a better passer because he has a higher success rate. I completely disagree and tend to form my own opinion from watching players and matches. No way do I think he is an awful player, like some, just that he lacks the football intelligence that could make him a great player with all his other attributes.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Probably but you're used to that by now :xmaslaugh:

No, in all seriousness I was surprised but I still think you can't just ignore interpretation of stats. What's your interpretation of it?

I did, however, expect King to be top because of the way he plays and the type of role he has when he plays.

My main point is that the OP claimed Schlupp is a better passer because he has a higher success rate. I completely disagree and tend to form my own opinion from watching players and matches. No way do I think he is an awful player, like some, just that he lacks the football intelligence that could make him a great player with all his other attributes.

My interpretation is two-fold really. Yep, players that try a better pass will fail more AND, again, fans favourite Esteban might not, just might not, be as good as people make out.

:thumbup:

Damn..shouldn't have said that..

lol

Posted

My interpretation is two-fold really. Yep, players that try a better pass will fail more AND, again, fans favourite Esteban might not, just might not, be as good as people make out.

:thumbup:

Damn..shouldn't have said that..

lol

 

Fair enough.

 

But leave our Esteban alone, will you!  :thumbup:

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Fair enough.

But leave our Esteban alone, will you! :thumbup:

Yes...

Enough is enough...

:thumbup:

In all sincerity I'd LOVE to be proven wrong and he play great and we start winning again..genuinely

Posted

Yes...

Enough is enough...

:thumbup:

In all sincerity I'd LOVE to be proven wrong and he play great and we start winning again..genuinely

 

Of course, you are a Leicester fan after all!

Posted

I have to be honest, Jeff is probably the first team player I rate the least. To me he just about gets by because the one outstanding attribute he has is unbelievable athleticism - he has an engine most players can only dream of and can recover quickly from mistakes.

After that though, there isn't much there for me. He's a decent striker of the ball, a poor passer and a rudimentary defender. He's a bit of a Jack of all trades. I hope he proves me wrong (genuinely) but for me he's a lower end championship player.

Posted

8/8 backwards passes

8/16 forward passes

Of the successful forward passes, only one was within the 2pm - 4pm angle (ie to in the direction of the goal) and that was a ten yard pass made from just outside his own penalty box. He made a further seven passes towards the goal, and every one failed. He didn't make a single successful pass into the box.

Compare with Mahrez who had a quiet day by his standards, he made six successful passes towards the goal and two into the box, including one chance created. Much more attacking endeavour, and still managing to have a pass completion similar to Jeff.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

8/8 backwards passes

8/16 forward passes

Of the successful forward passes, only one was within the 2pm - 4pm angle (ie to in the direction of the goal) and that was a ten yard pass made from just outside his own penalty box. He made a further seven passes towards the goal, and every one failed. He didn't make a single successful pass into the box.

Compare with Mahrez who had a quiet day by his standards, he made six successful passes towards the goal and two into the box, including one chance created. Much more attacking endeavour, and still managing to have a pass completion similar to Jeff.

Compare this to Cambiasso's stats which are actually very good..

:thumbup:

Posted

Yes...

Enough is enough...

:thumbup:

In all sincerity I'd LOVE to be proven wrong and he play great and we start winning again..genuinely

You are just like the Pearson haters, jumping on his back as soon as there is a problem.

This thing with cambiasso get over it!

Guest Col city fan
Posted

You are just like the Pearson haters, jumping on his back as soon as there is a problem.

This thing with cambiasso get over it!

Utter gubbins. I'm not hating anyone, simply giving an alternative view to the 'world class' one. And I'd said I'd leave it for now, until yet another daft sod provokes me.

If you care to look up, I was praising the man! As I have done on countless occasions. So YOU drop it my son.

Posted

The most important test/stat is the eye test.

 

An example is David Nugent. His stats state he scored the most goals in his career last season and was involved in a good portion of our goals. He did not pass the eye test. Vardy passes the eye test but his stats show that he is not as impressive as you'd think.

Posted

Utter gubbins. I'm not hating anyone, simply giving an alternative view to the 'world class' one. And I'd said I'd leave it for now, until yet another daft sod provokes me.

If you care to look up, I was praising the man! As I have done on countless occasions. So YOU drop it my son.

Every thread you bring up Cambiasso

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Every thread you bring up Cambiasso

So what? I make points. It's a forum. And I said I'm dropping it. Why don't you drop it? If you keep goading, I won't drop it, I'll keep arguing my point.

Posted

So what? I make points. It's a forum. And I said I'm dropping it. Why don't you drop it? If you keep goading, I won't drop it, I'll keep arguing my point.

I just fancied going fishing mate, I got catch of the day

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I just fancied going fishing mate, I got catch of the day

Simply shows you are a little 'ballon head' then don't it..

Grow up and pester someone else. Get some mates and go out and have a beer or something

Posted

Jeff any-good? What a question......he is great at any level.......be it.......middle weight, cruise weight or heavy weight ...... He OSA knock out! Seriously he is getting better and better in each game of late......just my opinion.

the Force is GENUINELY Stronger with this one

: )

Posted

Simply shows you are a little 'ballon head' then don't it..

Grow up and pester someone else. Get some mates and go out and have a beer or something

Cheer up mate it might never happen

Posted

Simply shows you are a little 'ballon head' then don't it..

Grow up and pester someone else. Get some mates and go out and have a beer or something

Lemonade is probably more apt, Col. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...