Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

DennisNedry

Member
  • Posts

    4,712
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DennisNedry

  1. Honestly, in the midst of a cost of living crisis, who gives a ****? The silly sod should have been sensible with the millions he was pocketing for years on end.
  2. This is a decent draw; winnable tie and a number of PL teams guaranteed to be out.
  3. Excellent save just before the Huddersfield goal. I think his weakness (similar to Kasper) is perhaps dealing with being crowded when the opposition crosses the ball at set pieces. I can see him being with us for years to come.
  4. I'm not sure if I'm remembering incorrectly, but Cardiff always seemed like a really tough place for us to go in the early 2010s. It felt like we'd lose every time, with Whittingham playing like peak Beckham. The play off semis were agony too. Very satisfying to go there and win comfortably. Edit: Shit me, didn't realise Whittingham had died!
  5. Very early days still, but it looks like the play offs for them.
  6. I think we'd have all taken an Ipswich draw at home to QPR but in the end Ipswich were very fortunate to get a point there, another stonewall penalty against them not given.
  7. I'm sure he's hit the post more than he's scored
  8. The measuring jug and kitchen scales.
  9. He's going to be useful throughout AFCON as a body if nothing else, but I've not seen anything from him to suggest he's worth signing.
  10. He's honestly just became a name I dread seeing on the team sheet, sadly.
  11. Still don't want it. Edit: not the thread to discuss it in depth
  12. Good result and a fair one on balance. Our subs really weakened us, I'd be happy to never see Kelechi in a Leicester shirt ever again.
  13. Obviously never nice to concede injury time but it's a good point away at 2nd place. I feel a draw is the fair result.
  14. Our substitutions have massively weakened us but then you can't have the same XI playing 90 minutes game after game over the Christmas period.
  15. I genuinely prefer taking the brunt of some crap decisions every now and then to be spared the farce of VAR.
  16. I'd take a point. Ipswich will really come at us, aggressively press us and not allow us to endlessly stroke the ball around the halfway line. I can see this being a high scoring game.
  17. This result will put the pressure on Ipswich when they play us, especially if we win today.
  18. The Ipswich Leeds game should be a cracker.
  19. The insanity of the situation is that taxpayers are funding unaffordable private rents via housing benefit. Think about it, your income tax is indirectly paying off a mortgage on somebody's portfolio while you can barely afford your own mortgage/rent.
  20. Maybe we should put some blame on the club as much as the fans? The club has been trying to do this for years; achieve a sterile, family friendly, sanitised 'match day experience'.
  21. I've said it before and I'll say it again, we need a unified singing section. When your vocal support is in 2 separate corners of the stadium, the atmosphere is never going to be brilliant. The death of L/K has been the biggest driver of our shit quiet bowl. You literally can't hear the Kop/UFS at all from the away end.
  22. Can't speak for the ground as a whole, and I'll probably get shit for being ageist, but where I sit the average age of the fan base is well into their 70s. The only noise that you hear from them is them snapping their KitKats. Obviously they've as much right to be there as anybody else, but realistically they'll renew every year until they die so there's no capacity to get younger fans in.
  23. Ipswich, Leeds and Southampton all looking like winning again. Makes our 3 points today all the more crucial.
  24. I'm not saying I agree with him by the way, it's really impossible for the average Joe to know one way or the other. In the defence of the author, he doesn't explicitly say it was deliberately released although I would accept it is perhaps inferred as one option, alongside accidental escape. He also suggests that the US could have been in collaboration with China. What interests me more is these kinds of statements: "The giveaway that the Covid virus is man-made are those telltale receptors, one of which is known as the Furin Cleavage Site. HIV fixes mainly on to one receptor - but the Covid virus binds to several, allowing it to lock into cells in the nose, mouth, lungs and elsewhere in the body. This gives the virus what we call a hypercharge, making it much more positively charged than any virus has been before. The Covid virus is designed for maximum impact - no such structure has occurred naturally in other coronaviruses" "in 2013, molecular biologists in the Wuhan Institute announced that such a viral structure had been created by genetic modification in the lab. They openly admitted they were working on this technique to magnify the viral charge, in so-called 'gain-of-function' research". As I say, how am I to evaluate these comments? I've no scientific knowledge. What he's saying could be bollocks. I don't know.
  25. There are still scientists that believe this https://mol.im/a/12811711
×
×
  • Create New...