HighPeakFox

I've tried, and one gets into a circle of deflection and denial.

I tend to want dangerous drivers as far away from me as possible.

'We know the facts'. Really, do 'we'?

Dunno, but I am just glad it wasn't me that provoked it - I'd be sorry if @Mark has been forced to close it because it got too much again.

We didn't, but I'm OK.

Correct solution, thank you all.

There's only one man that can solve this mystery - step up @Wymsey

Said the man who never sees conspiracy anywhere

Yes, that's what I am trying to persuade her to do. Unfortunately, she forgets/doesn't listen and is VERY prone to the convenience of the closest shiny thing to hand, and doesn't really understand why she gets in a pickle the whole time. Modern technology and a woman born before WW2 with failing mental acuity aren't a great combination, and she's not yet bad enough for us to take all her toys away and put her in a home. It's not an easy balance to strike.

Yes they can. But if, for example, I cull emails on her desktop, they remain on the other devices.

Hello all, I'm hoping someone can help me with this. My aged mother has a laptop on Windows, and an iPhone and iPad. She has Gmail on all 3 but I cannot get them to sync. Am I being rubbish, or is this something that is just not possible?

He's only just reached 100...

And Huth is on a hat trick

Now I cannot tell who is whoooshing whom.

Never mind.

Were you in a coma last season?

I think it's fanciful to think that there won't be huge disturbances surrounding the election.

Just a few million then.

I'm not so sure about this. In the case of JFK, there is probably way more decent evidence mitigating against the random lone nutter theory than in many other cases. As for your last para, those two things are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

On the subject of 'everything is a conspiracy', I tend to find that that sort of thinking comes from those who themselves have that tendency - a projection of sorts, just as people who get staunchly behind awful politicians or whatever are basically justifying their own minor awfulnesses. I must state for the record, this is my opinion and cannot back it up with peer reviewed fact or studies.

You realise we all read FT, right?

Now the leader board is published, we now have proof that perception is often inaccurate. I'm not even close

That's true

What does that even mean?

I can't work out whether he writes for tabloids or just reads them all.