stu

Obviously was linked to us. Sad the striker links have died.

Only positive with this is that this definitely won’t be a Russell Martin influenced signing, if it happens.

If it is Martin then it needs to work out for him, just as much as it needs to work out for us, otherwise he is finished as a manager. That’s the only thing I can cling on to.

How many loans from the Premier League are we allowed? This would obviously be our second.

6 days. Closes at 7pm on the 2nd of February.

Lots of mention of no PSR questions due to legal reasons in these interviews this morning makes me think even more we will be charged for 24/25 once the outcome of 23/24 is announced. This would explains the no Premier League statement about clubs meeting/breaching at the usual time this year. Hope I am wrong.

No direct quotes, but Tanner's article says they are on hold, but will be revisited if we get back to the Premier League.

Grrrr…

Yes he is. I was in the same class with him at primary school.

So, the conclusion from that is that all this self-inflicted due to financial mismanagement under King Power's watch and that no one, including Maguire, has a clue on what is going on in terms of our charges for PSR, so it is useless speculating until the outcome is published, whenever that will be. In other words, nothing we didn't already know, but an interesting listen.

Surely its got to the point that any normal walkout is a disappointment?

Striker and apparently the fee is 25 million kroma, which is just over £2m.

Twitter thread surely... Also: While his current market valuation sits near the €15 million mark, sources suggest that a bid in the region of £13 million could be enough to tempt Leeds into a mid-season sale. For Leicester , the move represents a dual-purpose strategy: acquiring immediate goal-scoring depth while securing an asset with high future resale value. Two potential deal structures are currently being explored: A loan with an obligation to buy triggered by appearance-based clauses, or a structured deal featuring a lower base fee with heavy performance-related add-ons.

Tier 99, but...

Beaten to signings by Charlton now...

There is still nothing in terms of announcements, not even confirmation that clubs have complied. This is probably complete speculation, but I do wonder whether last year’s announcement - that no charges were being brought against Premier League clubs at this point for 2023/24, while stating that matters with us were subject to arbitration - has since created legal complications. That may explain the delays and the difficulties in having charge outcomes upheld by an independent panel. I also can’t find any reference to that Premier League statement from this time last year on their website, but the news reports at that time still refer to it. This could mean nothing at all and that announcements are simply delayed, or that they are waiting for the outcome of the 2023/24 process before announcing a potential breach for 2024/25 for us without legal consequence. I find it really odd there is just no media coverage on our 23/24 PSR process at all from anywhere. Its almost like its been forgotten about.

Thought the announcement has been made by this time last year if it was coming today?

Bizarre, if true. Is Rudkin having palpitations about only having 3 senior goalkeepers? How can you look at our recent form and decide that the goalkeeper is the issue?

If you were to ask AI to give a definition of the ever obliging Leicester City, this would be the match it would reference...