Guest MattP Posted 15 May 2015 Posted 15 May 2015 No one can say this is out of date15th May 2015 I'll post it to save Moose doing it. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/disabled-charity-that-helped-camerons-son-loses-out-in-cuts-2269618.html How can you manage to do this so often? Even after you appear to have checked?
Strokes Posted 15 May 2015 Posted 15 May 2015 why waste your time? People would have voted differently under a different system. This is true, I would have voted differently under PR.
Rincewind Posted 24 May 2015 Posted 24 May 2015 You may have seen this before. From a couple of years ago but this still goes on but it is not widely known by the public.No comment needed. https://www.facebook.com/jsuknews/videos/445224512277652/?fref=nf DWP were unavailable for comment. Where have I heard that before?
MooseBreath Posted 24 May 2015 Posted 24 May 2015 You've linked us to a Facebook post from February 2014, which itself wrongly claims the video is new when in fact it's from 2012. Either that's you on Facebook or you've met your match there ken. http://www.channel4.com/news/disability-testing-system-failing-says-dead-mans-parents
MPH Posted 24 May 2015 Posted 24 May 2015 It's been a few days since the election now, WHY HASNT THE COUNTRY BEEN FIXED YET!!!!!!
Rincewind Posted 24 May 2015 Posted 24 May 2015 It's been a few days since the election now, WHY HASNT THE COUNTRY BEEN FIXED YET!!!!!! Still compiling a list of scapegoats to put the blame on. So far they have Immigrants, pensioners, unions, nurses, teachers, homeless people, unemployed, single parents, terrorists (includes anyone that protests) and the French.
Strokes Posted 24 May 2015 Posted 24 May 2015 It's been a few days since the election now, WHY HASNT THE COUNTRY BEEN FIXED YET!!!!!! I'm more surprised that the NHS hasn't been privatised yet, if the Tories want to keep their reputation going they really need to fúck over the country soon!
MooseBreath Posted 24 May 2015 Posted 24 May 2015 Still goes on. The assessment in that case was carried out by Atos, who were employed by Labour. The Tories have axed Atos and replaced them with another company who have employed more staff and have a disability rights activist as their Head of Service. So appeal wait times should be improving under the tories and if you think Atos were incompetent then blame labour for employing them.
ADK Posted 24 May 2015 Posted 24 May 2015 https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3575/How-Britain-voted-in-2015.aspx?view=wide Labour's Achilles heel is the over 65's vote.
davieG Posted 4 June 2015 Author Posted 4 June 2015 Royal Mail stake to be sold off, George Osborne announces 2 hours ago George Osborne: "It is the right thing to do for the Royal Mail, the businesses and the families who depend on it and crucially for the taxpayer" The government's remaining 30% stake in the Royal Mail is to be sold and £3bn cut from government spending this year, George Osborne has said. The chancellor said the Royal Mail shares money - valued at £1.5bn - would be used to pay down the national debt. The £3bn in cuts come ahead of further reductions to be announced in July. The NHS, schools and overseas aid are protected from cuts - but other departments such as the Home Office and MoD will have to find savings. Labour accused Mr Osborne of "ripping up" his long term economic plan by springing the announcement on MPs. The SNP said the move "poses real danger to the postal service and, in particular, the universal service obligation which is of huge importance to Scotland". Follow developments on the Royal Mail sell-off with Politics Live The government is committed to clearing the deficit by 2018/19 without increasing income tax or VAT, something Mr Osborne said would not be "easy". He needs to find a further £30bn of savings over the next three years, including £12bn to come out of welfare spending and £13bn from cuts to government departments. Former Labour leader Ed Miliband made his first Commons speech since losing the general election in the debate on the Queen's Speech, urging the chancellor to ensure David Cameron followed through "on his one nation rhetoric". Jump media player Media player help Out of media player. Press enter to return or tab to continue. Media captionEd Miliband: 'I used to be famous' Mr Miliband promised to hold Mr Cameron's government to account from the backbenches and said the Labour Party needed to do some "hard and painful thinking" about why it lost the election. The government holds a 30% stake in the Royal Mail, with the remaining 70% held by a combination of employees and private investors. Shares in Royal Mail were initially floated at 330p per share, and were trading at 526p at market close on Wednesday but fell 2.5% on Mr Osborne's announcement. Royal Mail privatisation Labour came up with the idea of selling off part of the Royal Mail, which is a separate company to the still publicly-owned Post Office, in 2008. But the plan proved hugely controversial, with the trade unions threatening strike action and it was ditched in 2009, with then Business Secretary Lord Mandelson blaming weak market conditions. Lib Dem Business Secretary Vince Cable resurrected the idea when the coalition government came to power. But he was accused by the National Audit Office of selling it off far too cheaply, losing taxpayers millions. Shares climbed 70% higher than their original 2013 sale price. Mr Cable refused to apologise, and said that the sale had raised £2bn for the taxpayer, with a further £1.5bn from the 30% stake in Royal Mail which it had retained. Mr Osborne told MPs: "I am today announcing that the Government will begin selling the remaining 30% shareholding we have in the Royal Mail. "It is the right thing to do for the Royal Mail, the businesses and families who depend on it - and crucially for the taxpayer. "Further savings in departments this year - and selling our stake in the Royal Mail. "Getting on with what we promised. Reducing the deficit - that is how you deliver lasting economic security for working people. "For as everyone knows, when it comes to living within your means, the sooner you start the smoother the ride." Business secretary Sajid Javid said the Royal Mail sell-off would happen "in the lifetime of this parliament" but that the government would listen to specially-appointed independent advisers about exactly how and when. "We have plenty of time to work on this. I don't think it's the kind of thing we want to rush into in anyway." He said his "overriding concern" was to "get the best possible deal for taxpayers".'Misleading impression'Mr Osborne said £3bn in efficiency savings had been achieved by belt-tightening in non-protected government departments and asset sales, including publicly-owned land around King's Cross station in London. The savings were made in the Home Office, DWP and Defra and business department including the higher and further education budgets. The Ministry of Defence will have to find £500m of savings this year, about 1.5% of its total budget. The MOD says that it will come from "efficiency savings" and will not impact operations or manpower. An MOD source says the cut "could have been worse" and is "manageable" but the BBC understands it might have an impact on the department's equipment plans. Mr Osborne will set out full details of future spending cuts in a Budget statement on 8 July. The director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Paul Johnson, said the £3bn worth of cuts in the current financial year was a "useful down payment" but "big difficult decisions" were still required. "£3bn will be tough to find in a single year but it's relatively small compared with the very tough target the Chancellor has set himself," he said. Chris Leslie MP: "There's a sort of sense of panic at the Treasury, I think" The IFS has said public spending cuts of 1% a year in 2016-17 and 2017-18 will be more difficult to achieve than was suggested in the Conservative Party's general election manifesto. In a statement, the think tank said: "The cuts that the government announces later this year in next month's Budget and the following Spending Review may turn out to be deliverable. "But they certainly will not feel like just 1% being taken out of each area of spending, nor will it require merely "£13 billion from departmental savings" as the Conservative manifesto described. "While not inaccurate, these numbers give a misleading impression of what departmental spending in many areas will look like if the manifesto commitment to eliminate the deficit by 2018-19, largely through spending cuts, while not cutting spending in many areas, is to be met." TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady said: "The chancellor's plan for fast and extreme cuts will hold back growth, and it will slash the tax credits and vital services that workers and their families rely on." Here is a full list of the departmental cuts announced by Mr Osborne: Education non-schools - £450m Health non-NHS - £200m Transport inc. King's Cross property - £545m Communities - £230m Business, Innovation and Skills - £450m Home Office £30m Justice - £249m Defence - £500m Foreign and Commonwealth Office - £20m Energy and Climate Change - £70m Environment, Food and Rural Affairs - £83m Culture, Media and Sport - £30m Work and Pensions - £105m HM Revenue and Customs - £80m HM Treasury - £7m Cabinet Office - £17m
Guest Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 Sell the postal service like you sold public housing to get your "free" money and then blame private individuals when the postal service goes tits up and people get ripped off.
Rincewind Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 Sell the postal service like you sold public housing to get your "free" money and then blame private individuals when the postal service goes tits up and people get ripped off. Yep thats the idea.
Webbo Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 Pretty sure the Post Office privatisation was a European Directive.
Guest Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 The postal service has always been shit. No it hasn't. It's been an incredibly good and efficient service where everyone wherever they live in the UK got their post delivered at a reasonable price.
purpleronnie Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 So what's changed? gigantic loss of money to the taxpayer?
ADK Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 It's how the Tories have always operated, selling your assets to cover short term spending. Classic long term loss, short term gain politics.
Strokes Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 Who sold the gold? That was a good deal for Britain.........damn those nasty Tories.
katieakita Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 Pretty sure the Post Office privatisation was a European Directive. Post Office hasn't been sold off, Royal Mail has. The last government wasted 1.34 billion on a network transformation program that failed and has earmarked a further 680 million to finish off this program. The postal service has always been shit. Compared with?
ADK Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 Who sold the gold? That was a good deal for Britain.........damn those nasty Tories. Gordon Brown? But do you only care when Labour does it?
Strokes Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 Gordon Brown? But do you only care when Labour does it? I don't care, just pointing it out.It's how the Tories have always operated, selling your assets to cover short term spending. Classic long term loss, short term gain politics.Do you only care when the Tories do it?
ADK Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 I don't care, just pointing it out. Do you only care when the Tories do it? No, but it is a very Tory thing to do. To aggressively privatise and then use the money to fund tax cuts and benefits for people who vote Tory. While the privatisations allow capitalists that are often linked to the Tory party to make easy money. In the case of Gordon Brown, it was a desperate attempt to balance the books that probably wouldn't have occurred if an election wasn't on the horizon.
Rincewind Posted 6 June 2015 Posted 6 June 2015 I r No it hasn't. It's been an incredibly good and efficient service where everyone wherever they live in the UK got their post delivered at a reasonable price. I remember when there was a post office just around the corner from me and there was a collection office near the station. How times have changed. Edited and four lines deleted. It was not that important.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.