Stuliasz Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Ratings this week should be very interesting but to avoid a few problems that arose last week, I am only going to count votes which: 1 - are not anything ridiculous like all 1's 2 - no negative numbers Here are mine: Walker 6 Canero 6 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 4 Heath 3 Scowcroft 7 Stewart 5 Nalis 5 Gudjonsson 3 Connolly 4 Dublin 3 Gillespie 4 Wilcox 4 Blake 2 My comments: Walker - should have done better on their goal Heath - Worst game I've seen him play, looked very risky and his distribution was woeful Tiatto - only him and scowy looked remotely interested, kept the ball brilliantly, won it back and passed it along the floor, hope he's not too injured Gudjonsson - anonymous Connolly & Dublin - no service but still poor Gillespie - did a few good things but the bad outweighed the good Blake - actually gave the ball away EVERY time he touched it Lets see everyone's ratings please.
Guest freund Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 7 Canero 5 Tiatto 9 Dabizas 5 Heath 4 Scowcroft 7 Stewart 4 Nalis 4 Gudjonsson 3 Connolly 3 Dublin 3 -------------- Gillespie 5 Wilcox 4 Blake 2 -------------- Adams -23
Buzzell Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 6 Canero 6 Tiatto 9 Dabizas 6 Heath 5 Scowcroft 6 Stewart 5 Nalis 6 Gudjonsson 3 Connolly 3 Dublin 2 -------------- Gillespie 5 Wilcox 4 Blake 2
Sparky Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 walker 6 canero 6 dabizas 4 heath 1 stewart 4 scowcroft 5 nalis 6 tiatto 7 *star man* gudjohnson 3 connolly 5 dublin 4 subs gillespie 5 blake 3 wilcox 3
Cat Burger Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 5 Canero 5 Heath 4 Dabizas 3 Stewart 2 Tiatto 7 Gudjonsson 4 Nalis 5 Scowcroft 5 Connolly 4 Dublin 4 Blake 0 Gillespie 5 Wilcox 0
Babylon Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 5 Canero 6 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 5 Heath 4 Scowcroft 7 Stewart 4 Nalis 5 Gudjonsson 4 Connolly 5 Dublin 5
Mark Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 6 Canero 6 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 3 Heath 3 Scowcroft 5 Stewart 7 Nalis 6 Gudjonsson 5 Connolly 5 Dublin 1 Gillespie 2 Wilcox 2 Blake 1
davieG Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 5 Canero 6 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 3 Heath 3 Scowcroft 5 Stewart 4 Nalis 6 Gudjonsson 3 Connolly 4 Dublin 3 Gillespie 3 Wilcox 2 Blake 1 MA - 2
Clunes Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 6 Didnt have a lot to do. Canero 6 Huffed and puffed but always looks scared to take the opposing full back on and stick a cross in Heath 4 He passing was woeful. Maybe he needs contacts Dabizas 4 A nervy display. Should dominate play more Tiatto 8 A quality little player, tried his nuts off. Good tackling and the only player prepared to do anything on the ball. Scowcroft 6 Typical scowie.Tried hard but its difficult to play at your best when you play in 4 different places in one game. Nalis 4 Ran around like a headless chicken. Poor Gudjohnson 3 Ran round like he didnt know whats hit him. Dont think hes used to playing Mickys style of football Stewart 6 tried hard but someone has got to stop him from taking all the set plays as they were shit. Dublin 3 Slow and never looked like scoring Connolly 3 Never looked like scoring. Spends too much time dropping deep for the ball so he never has the chance to hurt the opposition. Blake 1 Shit, absolute shit. Gillespie 3 Pretty poor. Should have got more balls in the box Wlicox 2 Shit absolute shit. Makes guppy look good
Ricey Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker - 6 - Nothing to do Stewart - 3 - Awful...just awful Heath - 4 - Very dodgy, could hardly kick the ball and was at fault for the goal Dabizas - 5 - Thought he looked okay, don't know why he was taken off instead of Heath Canero - 6 Played well, should get forward more Tiatto - 9 - Was amazing, he was working for all 11 players and was all over the place Gudjonsson - 6 - Passed the ball about well and was lively, should of got more invloved Nalis - 6 - Didn't really put a foot wrong but i feel sorry for Joey and Nalis because they must get a sore neck watching the ball fly over their heads towards Scowcroft Scowcroft - 5 - Wasn't that bad but we all know about our style of play and the fact he ain't a winger Connolly - 4 - Poor service but was still bad, never looked a threat Dublin - 4 - Was a handful sometimes but his heading was poor SUBS Blake - 2 - He may aswell just sat in one of the many empty seats, god he is crap! Why did he stand in front of the ****ing keeper when he was about to kick the ball because it just wastes time when it was us bloody losing!!! Wilcox - 3 - Usual shite Gillespie - 5 - Worked hard to begin with and looked a threat, was poor towards the end
Bluefoxtim Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 5 Canero 6 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 4 Heath 3 Scowcroft 5 Stewart 4 Nalis 6 Gudjonsson 3 Connolly 3 Dublin 1 Gillespie 5 Wilcox 4 Blake 1
Wellman Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 walker 5 canero 5 tiatto 8* heath 4 dabizas 4 scowy 4 stewart 3 gudjohnson 5 nalis 6 connolly 6 dublin 4 Wont even comment on the subs
Scow Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker - 5 Perhaps should have done better with the goal as his position was questionable. Had nothing to do apart from that. Canero - 5 Largely anonymous. Wasn't particularly impressive going forward, and looked nervous defending at times. Dabizas - 4 Had problems winning the ball in the air against Leon Knight, I think that says it all. Just to add that he is a liability with his 'unique' syle of defending by grabbing the striker around the neck, and then making out he has not touched them by pushing his chest out on to the back of the player. Heath - 3 Erm, what did he do right? Distribution was terrible, worst I have ever seen. Kept putting us under pressure by giving the ball away by poor heading/passing. Stewart - 3 Started off well, but reverted back to his usual shitness. Such a cocky twat at times who looks like he doesn't give a shit. Can't pass, can barely head, and can't cross. So why was he taking the set pieces? ****ing joke. Scowcroft - 6 I feel sorry for him. Asked to be played in 4 different positions throughout the game. He put the effort in whilst other's around him didn't. Nalis - 7 Always wanted the ball, passed it well, but rarely had any options. Gudjonnson - 3 Didn't do anything of note, and was overpowered in that central midfield area. Tiatto - 8* Best player for the past 3 games, and it's not hard to see why. He was everywhere chasing everything. He wanted the ball, he got the ball, and he did things with the ball. He was so committed, won tackles, got things started and never gave up. Dublin - 4 Poor upfront, never seemed to want to jump for the ball. Poor first touch generally, and was easily marshalled by Cullip. Connolly - 5 Ineffective, but that was largely down to the service he was receiving. He's not going to do much with aimless hoofs when he's about 5ft 7'. SUBS Nathan Blake - 0 Did absolutely nothing. Couldn't control the ball everytime it was played up to him. looked like the lethargic equivalent to Ade Akinbiyi. Wilcox - 3 Had no effect on the game, poor. Gillespie - 3 See Wilcox.
Cobbo Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker - 5 Canero - 5 Stewart - 5 Dabizas - 4 Heath - 3 Scowcroft -5 Tiatto - 9* Gudjonsson - 5 Nalis - 7 Dublin - 2 Connolly - 4 Subs: Gillespie - 3 (erm, how can you take a throw in like that? You should be fined...) Wilcox - 4 Blake - 1 I would add my thoughts on how I think they performed, but I can't be arsed - too depressed.
Teeno Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 Walker 6Canero 6 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 3 Heath 3 Scowcroft 5 Stewart 7 :w00t: :: Nalis 6 Gudjonsson 5 Connolly 5 Dublin 1 Gillespie 2 Wilcox 2 Blake 1 15973[/snapback] here's mine: Tiatto 9 Nalis 7 everyone else 2 nuff said?
Teeno Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 So we do miss Williams then? 16049[/snapback] No he's shit!!!
Cat Burger Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 He'll get another chance though up to him to take it.
Stuliasz Posted 30 August 2004 Author Posted 30 August 2004 So we do miss Williams then? 16049[/snapback] No he's shit!!! 16053[/snapback] Williams IS a good player and will come good. Trust me on this one.
Scow Posted 30 August 2004 Posted 30 August 2004 So we do miss Williams then? 16049[/snapback] No he's shit!!! 16053[/snapback] Williams IS a good player and will come good. Trust me on this one. 16059[/snapback] He won't if we keep bypassing the midfield with aimless hoofing in the direction of Connolly and Dublin.
kirkup21 Posted 31 August 2004 Posted 31 August 2004 Walker 4 Canero 6 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 4 Heath 3 Scowcroft 6 Stewart 3 Nalis 5 Gudjonsson 5 Connolly 5 Dublin 2 Gillespie 5 Wilcox 3 Blake 2
kerryh Posted 31 August 2004 Posted 31 August 2004 Walker 5 Canero 4 Tiatto 8 Dabizas 3 Heath 3 Scowcroft 7 Stewart 4 Nalis 6 Gudjonsson 4 Connolly 5 Dublin 3 Gillespie 5 Wilcox 3 Blake 2
Ric Flair Posted 31 August 2004 Posted 31 August 2004 The thing that astounds me about yesterday was we didn't even really hoof the ball. We sort of passed it about abit and then lost it, I honestly think we don't know how to pass the ball properly. Jordan Stewart is just unreal, I thought he had his best game for us and still words fail me. I can't work out whether on another day he would of had a good game, he started off shit hot but then the sheer cockiness of the man showed with his lacklustre crosses and set pieces. I think he's got the potential but can't be arsed to show it, if I was Adams i'd get an assasin in it's the only way to sort this squad out. Get rid and start again, WALKER - 6 - They only had one shot and it went in so it's hard to give a rating to him. Steady CANERO - 6 - I thought Canero did relatively well considering how abysmal we were, his best game this season for us. HEATH - 2 - The man's a twat, him and Dabizas are the worst defensive duo i've ever seen and I have seen Richard Smith and Jimmy Willis play together! Awful performance, his raking pass out to the the left wing in the second half said it all, it went in to row Z!! DABIZAS - 0 - Words fail me, I have never seen Dabizas have a good steady game for us. He constantly fouls the opposition, holding round players necks. He actually looked better in the premiership against good players, now he looks dire against even the shittest of players. STEWART - 3 - Started off well, but when the going got tough he produced his usual horrible arrogant display. SCOWCROFT - 6 - Steady game for a steady player. I feel sorry for him, if only he played upfront I think we'd see a better player. Looked good when the ball was on the ground, but had no help. Awful header at the end though, a part of his game he needs to strengthen. Since he hasn't been playing upfront he has lost his knack for scoring regularly. GUDJONSSON - 4 - Absent, has got some fight in him though. I just think it will take him time to settle, anyone with his attributes needs the ball at his feet and other players on the same wavelength as him. NALIS - 6 - Considering we usually bypass our midfield with hoofs, I thought Nalis did his upmost to be involved with the ball. He tries his best to make things happen and without him in the centre we will be on our way to League One. TIATTO - 8 - This chap is my new hero. I feel sorry for him, he is playing with a bunch of mongoles. He is everywhere and not only is he a battler he is very good on the ball, the only player who can beat a man. Shame he's got injured, but him and Nalis have got to be in our midfield all the time. DUBLIN - 4 - Awful game, looked unfit in my opinion. Did some clever little knock downs, but he's no Les Ferdinand. I thought Dublin would be awesome for us, but he needs to step up a few gears. CONNOLLY - 5 - Didn't do alot, didn't get the chance to. No service, I pray we turn things round because we have got one of the best strikers we've had in a long time and we're ruining him. Needs a goal. Subs: BLAKE - 0 - haha WILCOX - 1 - What have Wilcox and cling-ons got in common? They're both shit. GILLESPIE - 4 - Looked alright when he first came on, still uneager to prove himself.
Ian Posted 31 August 2004 Posted 31 August 2004 Walker 4 Should have done better with the goal. Canero 6 Played well but it is hard when your under 6ft and everytime the ball came down it had ice on it! Tiatto 8.5 Excellent must wonder what he has walked into. Dabizas 3 Grow up an realise your playing for City in the First division not some Greek god! Heath 3 Sorry mate but that has to be your worst performance in a city shirt. The guy you were marking was only up to your waist and out headed you once!!!! Scowcroft 7 Tried hard but it was impossible to make an impression when others on the pich didn't. Stewart 4 Good in the first 2o mins. Him and Tiatto on the left combined well and covered one another. BUT when the going got tough he simply vanished and played s***. Nalis 6 Again a good hard working performance Gudjonsson 3 Was he playing? I thought he had a good right foot on him, wher the hell is it then? Connolly 5 he will never score goals while we play this style of footy. TO HIS FEET NOT HIS HEAD! Dublin 1 A complete waste of space made Deano look like a gazelle! Gillespie 5 Started well and then faded (Like my sex life!) Wilcox 4 Mmmmm Blake 2 Mmmmm Probably the worst performance we have seen for years! I really hope that Micky sorts it out soon as we can only give him say another 3-4 games or the board will have to make a change! I am really confused as to whether it is Micks Management that is at fault or the players. Yesterday the players were quite simply unproffesional, Dublin is in the papers saying how we have to get stuck in etc etc and then performs like that!! The one thing that we do know is that for the first time this is MICKYS team not anybody elses so the buck stops with him. Listening to the post match interview with him you could tell he felt the pressure and that might be a good thing. We HAVE to beat Rotherham away or i am afraid the writing is on the wall!! The only good thing to come out of the weekend is Forest and Derby also lost so at least 106FM will be more bearable.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.