Shirt Sponsorship

[davieG]

According to the Daily Star

 

Huddersfied / Brighton 1.5m

Watford / Fulham / Cardiff / Burnley 3m

Leicester / Bournmouth 4m

Wolves 5m

Southampton 6m

Newcastle / Palace 6.5m

Everton 9.6m

West Ham 10m

Spurs 35m

Liverpool / Chelsea / Arsenal  40M

Man City 45m

Man Utd 47m

 

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/719963/Premier-League-shirt-sponsors-2018-19-season-money-deals-finance-price-sportgalleries

 

KP = Cheapskates 

 

[Finnegan]

Holy shit. 

[sylofox]

And people keep saying we are rich.

[Babylon]

How would they even know... complete guess work.

[davieG]

10 minutes ago, Babylon said:

How would they even know... complete guess work.

Would it be in the accounts of either the clubs or the businesses?

 

Although like you I think it's guesswork.

[Babylon]

8 minutes ago, davieG said:

Would it be in the accounts of either the clubs or the businesses?

 

Although like you I think it's guesswork.

Yes, but they'd only be able to cobble that together from previous years accounts. It's not current deals.

[AjcW]

Our sponsorship deal will fluctuate each season depending on how much the owners need to put in to keep FFP in check, that's one of the main reasons they sponsor the shirt and no one else.

 

[Nalis]

I guess West Ham's high figure is also based on it being plastered all over the London Stadium so surely a portion of thst should go back to the public?

[Cincinnati Fox]

1 hour ago, Nalis said:

I guess West Ham's high figure is also based on it being plastered all over the London Stadium so surely a portion of thst should go back to the public?

In the current climate of Government austerity and crazy money in football the West Ham stadium scam is an utter travesty.

I can’t believe they are getting away with it.

[Alex_LCFC]

As of man city charge themselfs 45m for there own company

Edited 31 July 2018 by Alex_LCFC

[Bayfox]

13 hours ago, Alex_LCFC said:

As of man city charge themselfs 45m for there own company

 

Helps them bend FFP rules. PSG do the same. In theory so could our owners. But I believe they consider writting of the debt they did enough of a leg up over then paying over the odds for the ground and shirt sponsorship.

 

But if they really wanted to crack the top 6 it's a way of throwing money at it. However I think they are happy to run at a small profit and tick over.

[sylofox]

On ‎31‎/‎07‎/‎2018 at 11:08, Babylon said:

How would they even know... complete guess work.

I thought under ffp and prem rules all sponsorship had to be disclosed.

 

22 hours ago, AjcW said:

Our sponsorship deal will fluctuate each season depending on how much the owners need to put in to keep FFP in check, that's one of the main reasons they sponsor the shirt and no one else.

 

Not sure either do it I thought the deal has to be set out over a period of time.They can't say a 3yr deal is £45m a year and pay in £80m because the club needs it.

[Babylon]

10 minutes ago, sylofox said:

I thought under ffp and prem rules all sponsorship had to be disclosed.

 

Not sure either do it I thought the deal has to be set out over a period of time.They can't say a 3yr deal is £45m a year and pay in £80m because the club needs it.

To the league maybe, but not to the press.

[sylofox]

12 minutes ago, Babylon said:

To the league maybe, but not to the press.

Yeah but numerous people would have access to the details. The lure of a free holiday and 20k spendo would tempt a few