Brendan Rodgers..yay or nay?

[Steve_Walsh5]

On 16/01/2019 at 11:26, The Doctor said:

Purely because he had a genuinely world class Suarez on hand. But, he wasn't a good manager for them and most Liverpool fans wouldn't give him any credit for their current status like you did. 

 

Guys a David Brent wannabe and not that good. Getting rid of Puel for him would not be an improvement

 

[casablancas]

Apparently he’s not favourited by the Man City board to take on peps role when he leaves. This is interesting when you consider arteta has come out and said he’d be interested in the Arse role. 

 

Lets hope arse want a huge name or fancy Viera. 

[ithuriel]

Still gets my vote, even the F-bar agrees as the sign now says THE b r along the side of the building 

[Steve_Walsh5]

On 16/01/2019 at 12:44, The Doctor said:

Indeed they do, which means realising that Puels getting us to about as high as we can realistically be without massive investment. So, why destabilise the club by changing managers when that's not really going to improve us? It's change for the sake of change, and to satisfy the majority of idiots in our fanbase

I’m not surprised this moron hasn’t been on the site since 8th March. 
 

Bloody clueless. 

[st albans fox]

11 minutes ago, Steve_Walsh5 said:

I’m not surprised this moron hasn’t been on the site since 8th March. 
 

Bloody clueless. 

I wonder what he was a doctor of ?   More likely he changed his username ......

[Father Ted]

On 14/12/2019 at 11:36, nwl fox said:

Hmmm did you mean not very good authority?? 

When I say good authority it was by the man himself 😂 Things changed when Puel left 

 

Suppose even he was wrong haha 

Edited 18 December 2019 by Father Ted

[StanSP]

I voted yay.