Tin Foil Hat Conspiracy Thread

[bovril]

2 hours ago, Dr The Singh said:

That constant intensive use of being tangoed will have that effect.

 

Like Elizabeth I's blood being poisoned by her makeup, Donald is slowly going mad due to overuse of fake tan. 

[Dreadnought]

Not sure what to make of all this talk of “underground cities” under the pyramids. 

[HighPeakFox]

On 20/03/2025 at 11:08, Foxdiamond said:

Interesting about range shooting. I believe he was rated as a marksman when he was a US Marine

Which was the lowest ranking going.

 

[Foxdiamond]

9 hours ago, HighPeakFox said:

Which was the lowest ranking going.

 

But a qualification nonetheless that at least confirms experience of firearms.

[simFox]

18 hours ago, Bilo said:

That he is undergoing cognitive decline is indeed obvious. The argument that his entourage know, and have a diagnosis, but are keeping it under wraps so they can exploit a dementia patient and use him as an unwitting figurehead for a far-right agenda would be the greatest scandal in the history of American politics were it proved.

But that is EXACTLY what happened with Biden. Didn't turn out to be the biggest scandal at all. They had his signature on autopen, which itself isn't unusual, but is when it's used for literally  everything. 

[HighPeakFox]

4 hours ago, Foxdiamond said:

But a qualification nonetheless that at least confirms experience of firearms.

You are reaching. He had a terrible reputation as a marksman. 

 

I'm sorry to say this, but if you really believe the lone nut theory, you are willing to overlook overwhelming evidence that clearly shows that it couldn't be done as the official line wishes us to believe. 

 

I've no idea precisely who did it. But I'm pretty sure it was only allowed to happen because the right very rich people okayed it and funded it. 

[Bilo]

1 hour ago, simFox said:

But that is EXACTLY what happened with Biden. Didn't turn out to be the biggest scandal at all. They had his signature on autopen, which itself isn't unusual, but is when it's used for literally  everything. 

Most of the rumours of Biden's dementia seem to come from the right, while Trump’s come from physicians and experts.

 

That said, there is quite a bit of difference between holding Biden's hand as he ages and deliberately using Trump as a patsy. 

 

 

[leicsmac]

9 minutes ago, Bilo said:

Most of the rumours of Biden's dementia seem to come from the right, while Trump’s come from physicians and experts.

 

That said, there is quite a bit of difference between holding Biden's hand as he ages and deliberately using Trump as a patsy. 

 

 

Didn't you get the memo?

 

Because science has become "politicised", the viewpoint of a decades-long expert in the field and someone with a slick manner and a YouTube channel are equally valid. See vaccines, climate change etc.

[Foxdiamond]

1 hour ago, HighPeakFox said:

You are reaching. He had a terrible reputation as a marksman. 

 

I'm sorry to say this, but if you really believe the lone nut theory, you are willing to overlook overwhelming evidence that clearly shows that it couldn't be done as the official line wishes us to believe. 

 

I've no idea precisely who did it. But I'm pretty sure it was only allowed to happen because the right very rich people okayed it and funded it. 

I know we had a little debate a while ago. Guess we will have to agree to disagree on our interpretation of said evidence. Just to add I don't think you needed to be a top army sniper to hit JFK from the infamous window. 

[HighPeakFox]

17 minutes ago, Foxdiamond said:

I know we had a little debate a while ago. Guess we will have to agree to disagree on our interpretation of said evidence. Just to add I don't think you needed to be a top army sniper to hit JFK from the infamous window. 

Um. Nobody has been able to replicate the feat. Nobody. 

[Foxdiamond]

16 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said:

Um. Nobody has been able to replicate the feat. Nobody. 

Not what I've read

[HighPeakFox]

11 minutes ago, Foxdiamond said:

Not what I've read

It's only been done when they've altered vital considerations. Which of course renders the results null and void. 

 

Anyway, we're not going to agree. 

[Foxdiamond]

11 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said:

It's only been done when they've altered vital considerations. Which of course renders the results null and void. 

 

Anyway, we're not going to agree. 

Onto the next topic perhaps 

[Blarmy]

Anyone interested in the JFK assassination should read “I Heard You Paint Houses”, the book that the film The Irishman is based on. The usual critical thinking is required, it is just a man’s story after all, but it definitely provides “makes you think” moments.

[Bilo]

5 hours ago, leicsmac said:

Didn't you get the memo?

 

Because science has become "politicised", the viewpoint of a decades-long expert in the field and someone with a slick manner and a YouTube channel are equally valid. See vaccines, climate change etc.

The logic that Biden has dementia seems to centre around his age, stammer and occasional lapses in memory. The first is connected to the last. Frankly, the job isn't for any man in his late seventies or early eighties, but I've seen enough of him to know he's still sharp.

 

Trump’s behaviour worries me far more. Impulsive, aggressive, inarticulate at the best of times, the odd lean and completely unable to remember what he's said and where. If he were my dad, I'd be taking his car keys from him and telling him to see his GP.

[Dunge]

Hang on, I thought the Democrats admitted that Biden had been going senile for four years and they’d known all along? Or was that fake news?

[blabyboy]

On 23/03/2025 at 18:19, Bilo said:

https://as.cornell.edu/news/trumps-abrupt-decision-play-dj-sign-accelerating-cognitive-decline-says-cornell-expert

 

I wouldn't be so sure.

The timing of that article might suggest it's more 'wish fulfillment' than anything else. You can point to counter factuals for each of the points referenced.

 

I'm in no way pro-Trump, tbc, but that is not a very good article on which to base an argument imo.

[Bilo]

2 minutes ago, blabyboy said:

The timing of that article might suggest it's more 'wish fulfillment' than anything else. You can point to counter factuals for each of the points referenced.

 

I'm in no way pro-Trump, tbc, but that is not a very good article on which to base an argument imo.

'Wish fulfillment?'

 

It's an Ivy League University...

[leicsmac]

Speaking personally, I think that the damage of the actions caused by the current US administration - both present and over the next couple of years - matter far more than the reasoning behind why they're happening anyway.

 

The fact that the very idea of truth is being subverted and that is deeply consequential for our future is the big thing.

[Dunge]

46 minutes ago, blabyboy said:

The timing of that article might suggest it's more 'wish fulfillment' than anything else. You can point to counter factuals for each of the points referenced.

 

I'm in no way pro-Trump, tbc, but that is not a very good article on which to base an argument imo.

I’m inclined to agree. A lot of the purported evidence I’ve seen about Trump possibly having  dementia reads like people hoping he has dementia more than anything. Like we all hoped Putin was going to snuff it soon when he was behaving oddly shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

 

Trump may have early dementia, he may not. But all this stuff came out in the lead-up to the election from people trying to get on the “Democrats got rid of their senile candidate, what about the Republicans?” bandwagon.

[blabyboy]

2 hours ago, Bilo said:

'Wish fulfillment?'

 

It's an Ivy League University...

And you do not think there could be any bias in that article at all? .. because a contributor lectures at an Ivy League university?

 

[Sly]

So are we saying we still don’t know who shot JFK? 
 

Here’s a thought, maybe they were aiming for his wife from the window and missed. 
 

Thus starting the biggest “who dunnit” in world history? 

[leicsmac]

9 hours ago, blabyboy said:

And you do not think there could be any bias in that article at all? .. because a contributor lectures at an Ivy League university?

 

And unfortunately that's the road we've gone down now.

 

It begins with criticism of the assessment of a political figure (whether valid or not), simply because that figure is political, and it ends with the entire idea of expertise and the scientific method on every matter being called into question, as Sagan predicted.

 

I get the idea of being sceptical of personal bias from an expert towards a divisive political figure, I do. But the death of trust in scientific expertise that starts there ends nowhere good.

[Foxdiamond]

5 hours ago, Sly said:

So are we saying we still don’t know who shot JFK? 
 

Here’s a thought, maybe they were aiming for his wife from the window and missed. 
 

Thus starting the biggest “who dunnit” in world history? 

Like everywhere else only some here think Oswald didn't do it. 

[HighPeakFox]

5 hours ago, Sly said:

So are we saying we still don’t know who shot JFK? 
 

Here’s a thought, maybe they were aiming for his wife from the window and missed. 
 

Thus starting the biggest “who dunnit” in world history? 

I can only speak for myself - my only certainty in my head is that LHO was framed. In all such instances, the best advice is to follow the money.