Foxes_Trust Posted 28 November 2005 Posted 28 November 2005 Had reports of much more relaxed stewarding at the weekend via one message board, what's the views of posters from those areas on here?
Jimmy Posted 28 November 2005 Posted 28 November 2005 dint notice a difference, i think its more a question for L1 though
Scow Posted 28 November 2005 Posted 28 November 2005 I noticed that we were given more freedom to stand up longer than usual, particularly at times when we were producing attack after attack in the second half. I can only speak from a Kop perspective though.
Ric Flair Posted 29 November 2005 Posted 29 November 2005 I didn't notice, but I did notice that it was the best atmosphere for a year or so, that was down to the fact the game was electrifying and the fans responded. I think it would have been almost impossible for the stewards to do anything on saturday as people were up and down constantly. But if they can do that more often and it helps to the atmosphere then that would be great.
syston_fox Posted 29 November 2005 Posted 29 November 2005 dint notice a difference, i think its more a question for L1 though Well seeing as you've not had any problems with the stewards, that should be a good thing!
Jimmy Posted 29 November 2005 Posted 29 November 2005 the only problem i have with them is they get in the fooking way when u got to the concorses during the match
syston_fox Posted 29 November 2005 Posted 29 November 2005 In that case, i'd like to make a complaint about everyone in H block of the A&L stand who gets in my way as i try and leave the stadium!
knightonfox Posted 29 November 2005 Posted 29 November 2005 stewards and arange coat brigade have definately become more relaxed in L1 for the last 2 games. As a result of this there has been a lot better atmosphere and less aggrevation. Stewards even seemed to be laughing at some of the banter on saturday instead of flying in to wrestle people out of the ground. Have got to give Time Davies and club officials credit for this. was at the open meeting a couple of weeks ago and Tim said that stewards would have to become more relaxed and agreed that a compromise had to be reached. Really hope that this compromise can mean that the 50-60 people at the back of L1 will be allowed to stand at all games should they wish to. What do foxes trust reckon about it?
Foxes_Trust Posted 29 November 2005 Author Posted 29 November 2005 stewards and arange coat brigade have definately become more relaxed in L1 for the last 2 games. As a result of this there has been a lot better atmosphere and less aggrevation. Stewards even seemed to be laughing at some of the banter on saturday instead of flying in to wrestle people out of the ground. Have got to give Time Davies and club officials credit for this. was at the open meeting a couple of weeks ago and Tim said that stewards would have to become more relaxed and agreed that a compromise had to be reached. Really hope that this compromise can mean that the 50-60 people at the back of L1 will be allowed to stand at all games should they wish to. What do foxes trust reckon about it? We are pleased, the comments we have observed so far all indicate a change of attitude as you have stated. We are glad the meeting was relatively well attended in comparison to the previous one & it came across quite clearly from the fans there that things had to change & the club acted. This time this backed up our survey which came to a similar conclusion, therefore it was worth the open meeting getting all the parties together, which again was our suggestion and it has delivered results. We await Lush's admittance that it wasn't a waste of time after all
Soho_Fox Posted 29 November 2005 Posted 29 November 2005 We are pleased, the comments we have observed so far all indicate a change of attitude as you have stated. We are glad the meeting was relatively well attended in comparison to the previous one & it came across quite clearly from the fans there that things had to change & the club acted. This time this backed up our survey which came to a similar conclusion, therefore it was worth the open meeting getting all the parties together, which again was our suggestion and it has delivered results. We await Lush's admittance that it wasn't a waste of time after all
Katy Posted 29 November 2005 Posted 29 November 2005 We are pleased, the comments we have observed so far all indicate a change of attitude as you have stated. We are glad the meeting was relatively well attended in comparison to the previous one & it came across quite clearly from the fans there that things had to change & the club acted. This time this backed up our survey which came to a similar conclusion, therefore it was worth the open meeting getting all the parties together, which again was our suggestion and it has delivered results. We await Lush's admittance that it wasn't a waste of time after all I think hell could well freeze over before that happens
Head Honcho Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 We are pleased, the comments we have observed so far all indicate a change of attitude as you have stated. We are glad the meeting was relatively well attended in comparison to the previous one & it came across quite clearly from the fans there that things had to change & the club acted. This time this backed up our survey which came to a similar conclusion, therefore it was worth the open meeting getting all the parties together, which again was our suggestion and it has delivered results. We await Lush's admittance that it wasn't a waste of time after all I have no doubt that the heavy handed approach will return if and when the stadium starts to fill up again.
Manwell Pablo Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 We are pleased, the comments we have observed so far all indicate a change of attitude as you have stated. We are glad the meeting was relatively well attended in comparison to the previous one & it came across quite clearly from the fans there that things had to change & the club acted. This time this backed up our survey which came to a similar conclusion, therefore it was worth the open meeting getting all the parties together, which again was our suggestion and it has delivered results. We await Lush's admittance that it wasn't a waste of time after all will be a long wait. What you will get is Lush persisting in saying it was a waste of time, asking exactly what has changed, ignoring every one who says it has and @ some point say " nobody has yet explained what has actually changed."
Lester LXXIV Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 They'll never please everyone, no matter what they change!
lush Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 We await Lush's admittance that it wasn't a waste of time after all Well hats off, so far its been a success, a gambler would be proud Allen: "I have no doubt that the heavy handed approach will return if and when the stadium starts to fill up again." I`d love to see evidence of any heavy handed approach?
john_lcfc Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 was in L1 on saturday and it was fantastic. the police were so relaxed with no ejections throughout the match. they let us stand ( about 25 rows did give or take a few) and me and the people i went with had one of the best times we have had at the walkers stadium. see lush these meetings do make a difference as shown on saturday any other week and 10 more people would have been added to the ban list. well done the foxes_trust and Lisa and all who helped make the game on saturday thouroughly enjoyable for the crowd in L1 funny how the game that all stewards are relaxed we see the best atmosphere this season? we were winning though
lush Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 see lush these meetings do make a difference as shown on saturday any other week and 10 more people would have been added to the ban list. well done the foxes_trust and Lisa and all who helped make the game on saturday thouroughly enjoyable for the crowd in L1 OUR club has been forced by stupidity, to break the law. If ANY of the 22,382 had sustained an injury due to standing, OUR ground could`ve been closed down. But im glad the few hundred of you enjoyed yourselves at the expense of 20,000 city fans. Had the worst occurd, foxes trust and lisa etc, would`ve been having sleepless nights, sweets and cold shivers, and this website might`ve been told to stop promoting illegal behaviour.
Isopen Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 OUR club has been forced by stupidity, to break the law. If ANY of the 22,382 had sustained an injury due to standing, OUR ground could`ve been closed down. But im glad the few hundred of you enjoyed yourselves at the expense of 20,000 city fans. Had the worst occurd, foxes trust and lisa etc, would`ve been having sleepless nights, sweets and cold shivers, and this website might`ve been told to stop promoting illegal behaviour. Do you drive a car Lush? - Well I wouldn't if I was you, you might get injured........ Bet the numbers injured in car accidents per year out strips those injured in stadiums by 1'000's of %'s.
Katy Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 OUR club has been forced by stupidity, to break the law. If ANY of the 22,382 had sustained an injury due to standing, OUR ground could`ve been closed down. But im glad the few hundred of you enjoyed yourselves at the expense of 20,000 city fans. Had the worst occurd, foxes trust and lisa etc, would`ve been having sleepless nights, sweets and cold shivers, and this website might`ve been told to stop promoting illegal behaviour. Would that be for the shock then?
john_lcfc Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 OUR club has been forced by stupidity, to break the law. If ANY of the 22,382 had sustained an injury due to standing, OUR ground could`ve been closed down. But im glad the few hundred of you enjoyed yourselves at the expense of 20,000 city fans. Had the worst occurd, foxes trust and lisa etc, would`ve been having sleepless nights, sweets and cold shivers, and this website might`ve been told to stop promoting illegal behaviour. Lush id stop typing now you might strain your thumb. the club will not have the ground closed Lush if some 200 people stand,.. other clubs thoughsands stand man u leeds etc.. grounds closes? ermm no
lush Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 Do you drive a car Lush? - Well I wouldn't if I was you, you might get injured........ Bet the numbers injured in car accidents per year out strips those injured in stadiums by 1'000's of %'s. Its LEGAL to drive, its NOT legal to stand, you broke the law. john lcfc: "the club will not have the ground closed Lush if some 200 people stand". Only if the law makers dont notice. You guys are so selfish.
Magictv Posted 30 November 2005 Posted 30 November 2005 lets be honest the ground wont close because 200 people stand...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.