Pick one - Ruud or Rudkin?

[Vazman]

15 hours ago, TheFiveTime said:

Normally I'd do a list of positives and negatives for both and take my time with it, but I cant think of one positive for either this season and the negatives would take too much time just get rid of both whatever it takes

[TonyN11]

Wouldn't allow me to vote as I wanted 

[Realist Guy In The Room]

If you held a gun to my head and told me to choose, i’d probably take the bullet.

[Stadt]

Managers get sacked whenever, Rudkin's incompetence is pervasive in every footballing function at the club.

 

Wanting RVN out first is just completely short termist. Top goes first ideally.

[Chrysalis]

Ruud.

 

Rudkin's impact is a longer term and more meaningful, Ruud just affects game results and would get fired anyway at some point.

 

Our problems are much more than losing games, anyone picking Rudkin is putting short term results first.

[Dan]

The case for Rudkin is actually better isn't it the more I think about it  but it is just simply because I've wanted him out far, far longer. I think a competent replacement for him (unlikely) would have Ruud gone in virtually no time either.

[stevostadium]

what a ridiculous thread

both are not fit for purpose

As for a choice between the 2, i am baffled

[CrazyKopCorner]

This is a poll set up by someone sick in the mind. 

 

Would you rather piss yourself or shit yourself in public is a similar quandary 

[brookfox]

Ruud would be winning the battle, Rudkin winning the war.

[ozvaldo]

Rudkin is the deep rooted issue. 
 

However RVN has been shit. 
 

But I’d still want Rudkin gone. 

[CosbehFox]

Rudkin