Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, FoxesBraun said:

Very concerning considering this is meant to be our best team.

The club need to spend money in January. We lack quality 

Posted

I have been very happy to give Passmoor the benefit of doubt, but this result does indeed point to more than just poor players. They are poor, but not that bad...

He won't be sacked now, probably not until the end of the season, unless we are in real immediate danger of relegation.

Posted
4 hours ago, Ryy said:

Rick was a strange and poor appointment needs to be sacked asap

he was only meant to be a caretaker until Matt Beard came in, they rushed into appointing him after Beard died

Posted
3 hours ago, lcfcrinaldi said:

I have been very happy to give Passmoor the benefit of doubt, but this result does indeed point to more than just poor players. They are poor, but not that bad...

He won't be sacked now, probably not until the end of the season, unless we are in real immediate danger of relegation.

might help if he picked a system that suited the players, we have 1 player that can play left wing back and she's naturally a right back and a player who is made to play right wing back who he won't pick as she's "too young and inexperienced" playing strikers there instead he hasn't go a clue 

  • Like 1
Posted

Listening to his post match comments doesn't inspire any confidence and makes you wonder if he was at the right match. I aĺso don't like it when he talks up our performances, especially when you know things are not too good.

Posted
10 minutes ago, lcfcrinaldi said:

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/nov/24/wsl-concern-sky-sports-broadcast-slots-low-tv-audience

 

Shame the concern here is viewers as opposed to attendance, but the root cause is the same. Hopefully this means the WSL are willing to fight for a change.

Doesn't add any weight to their argument for equal pay to the men's game. without the TV money they'd be on even less.

Posted
18 minutes ago, davieG said:

Doesn't add any weight to their argument for equal pay to the men's game. without the TV money they'd be on even less.

That isn't the point of the change, it's not to drop the deal they have with Sky, it's to influence different kick-off times, which is kind of mad that Sky gets to dictate that to the WSL.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...