FanAnn Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 If you had the decision to release either Kisnorbo OR Hamill, who would it be?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walkers Wonderkid Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 leveins tactics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milky Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 If you had the decision to release either Kisnorbo OR Hamill, who would it be?? that poll is a no brainer. hamill really is very very poor. conference standard. in fact, that burton albion left winger, the irish bloke looks much better than him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reverend Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 If you had the decision to release either Kisnorbo OR Hamill, who would it be?? Cant you add both to this poll?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syston_fox Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 Drop Hammill cause at least we could play around Kisnorbo if needs be but you could always use a winger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertine Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 Hamill. And Kisnorbo. And De Vries. And Levein. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barwell Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 Cant you add both to this poll?! If both were added, then it would just be 100% to that!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holly Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 you should of put a both on there, had to pick hamill though, coz the games he has played in have all been shocking, whereas kisnorbo has had a couple of ok games! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gené and Tonic Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 Kisnorbo is the lesser of two evils Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanAnn Posted 14 January 2006 Author Share Posted 14 January 2006 If both were added, then it would just be 100% to that!! Exactly why I didn't Neither should be in our squad, but i wanted to see who everyone thought was the worst of the worst!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
syston_fox Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 you should of put a both on there, had to pick hamill though, coz the games he has played in have all been shocking, whereas kisnorbo has had a couple of ok games! The only game i can think of that Kisnorbo has done ok in is the watford one at vicarage road. And i suppose he didnt put a foot wrong in the spurs game - those two touches were neat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Nicky Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 Got to be Kisnobheado! At least Hammill isn't guaranteed a game every week! He was only in today lets face it cuz Twattio n Smith were out Kisnorbo out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 Hamill. And Kisnorbo. And De Vries. And Levein. And anyone else who doesn't play with any passion and doesn't fight for the shirt. Get the youth team in, they'll put more fight and passion in IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Nicky Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 Henderson Stearman Gerrbrand McCarthy Sheehan Hughes Gudjohnsson Williams Smith Hume Fryatt Subs: Logan, Dublin, Wesolowski, Chambers, Hammond That do everyone? Loads of passion, players that want to be here and a lot of youth! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertine Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 HendersonStearman Gerrbrand McCarthy Sheehan Hughes Gudjohnsson Williams Smith Hume Fryatt Subs: Logan, Dublin, Wesolowski, Chambers, Hammond That do everyone? Loads of passion, players that want to be here and a lot of youth! To be fair, I think Rab is quite passionate, just rubbish. :w00t: Played alright today though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveyJ Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 It's got to be Kisnorbo, absolutely no contest. He was so poor against Wednesday. For a defensive midfield player his tackling was abysmal. He would run up near to the player but not near enough to challenge then let them run round him. Brun't goal was his fault, in all fairness Brunt had already gone round Hammil but you can't expect a winger to win tackles. Whereas Kisnorbo, as defender/midfielder ought to win at least 70% of tackles, but he doesn't win 10%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveyJ Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 To be fair, I think Rab is quite passionate, just rubbish. :w00t: Played alright today though. Yeah Rab get's stick that he doesn't always deserve. He couldn't do a lot about either goal today. What about Chris O'Grady? He's young, powerful and in warm up today i think he scored more against Hendo than the others (maybe not Fryatt but certainly more than Hume). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 i think levein would only have droped hammil from the team that started against spurs, had that been an option but with joey and smith suspended, tiatto injured, morris and wesolowski not fit and wilcox at blackpool he was FORCED to play both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimp Posted 14 January 2006 Share Posted 14 January 2006 i think levein would only have droped hammil from the team that started against spurs, had that been an option but with joey and smith suspended, tiatto injured, morris and wesolowski not fit and wilcox at blackpool he was FORCED to play both He should have replaced Hammil with Hume as soon as he saw he wasn't performing. Hume is comfortable on his left foot and would have offered so much more even if it did narrow the play on occassions. They could have moved between a 4-4-2, 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2 formation with ease had Hume been given license to roam and shake up the midfield. Either that or move Hughes to the left, Hammond to the right and Hume up front. Anything except replace like with like on a day where things clearly aren't working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martyn Posted 15 January 2006 Share Posted 15 January 2006 Kisnorbo, simply because Levein is more inclined to play him than Hamill when everyone is fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anish Posted 15 January 2006 Share Posted 15 January 2006 Kisnorbo - he has no control, no skills, no creativity, no passing ability, no vision - all the skills you look for in a midfielder. Plus like Martyn and others have said, he's more likely to play than Hamill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxes_Wizard_Striker Posted 15 January 2006 Share Posted 15 January 2006 I would drop Hamill, He was anoyomus against Spurs and at least Kisnorbo attempt to get in the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultra Posted 15 January 2006 Share Posted 15 January 2006 Kisnorbo can at least fill in at left back. He's done no worse than anyone else in that position. Hamill on the other hand is dreadful. We should have put Hume, O'Grady or Even Sheehan in his position yesterday. He makes Sylla look like Keith Weller! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rugbyfox jnr Posted 15 January 2006 Share Posted 15 January 2006 Neither. Both. There's only one i want to see dropped at the mo, Levein OUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byebyelevein Posted 15 January 2006 Share Posted 15 January 2006 they are both absolutely shite, but i would get rid of kisnorbo becasue Hamill is younger so we could potentially get a better player in the future, or an extra grand when we sell him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.