TornadoShaunUK Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Just got back from the game. All over them and beat in the last minute, didn't really see much of the goal. I think we definately have to start with Fryatt and Hume upfront. We played really well today, Hammond was woeful but was the only player in my mind that let us down. Pleasantly surprised by Maybury, he was playing right midfield and it seems a good position for him to be in, played very well there I felt. Only gripe I would have that comes to mind would be that I would like to see our wide midfelders alot wider when the ball is on the opposite flank; stretch the opposition a bit and if they don't mark you out wide then you give yourself some time and space. I felt we even looked a little brighter at set pieces for the most part today.
Anish Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 I thought Maybury was wank to be honest. Let us down on a number of occasions, and looked ineffective going forward. Hammond wasn't great, but on the whole neither were any of the others.
The People's Hero Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Maybury really isn't a midfielder though is he? At least Lush has had her way now though.
Trumpet Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 I thought Maybury was wank to be honest. Let us down on a number of occasions, and looked ineffective going forward. Hammond wasn't great, but on the whole neither were any of the others. Thank-you! Someone who watched the same match as me. I go week in week out and it looks all the same. Some plant pot said we produced alot of chances but couldnt score, he was watching a different game then....
TornadoShaunUK Posted 28 January 2006 Author Posted 28 January 2006 no he isn't but I felt he did better there than in any other position I've seen him in and also I might add, better in that position than anyone else I can remember playing on right mid. Only player who let us down today was Hammond in my eyes, not just cause he missed a good chance, he was off the ball all game and it was a welcome site to see him substituted with 20 mins to go. Nice that it wasn't left til 5-10 mins from the end before that substitute was made aswell..
The People's Hero Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 no he isn't but I felt he did better there than in any other position I've seen him in and also I might add, better in that position than anyone else I can remember playing on right mid. Only player who let us down today was Hammond in my eyes, not just cause he missed a good chance, he was off the ball all game and it was a welcome site to see him substituted with 20 mins to go. Nice that it wasn't left til 5-10 mins from the end before that substitute was made aswell.. Yeah - hopefully the 87th minute game-changing substitutions are gone!
l444ry Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Thank-you! Someone who watched the same match as me. I go week in week out and it looks all the same. Some plant pot said we produced alot of chances but couldnt score, he was watching a different game then.... For what it's worth we had 10 shots with 2 on target. Soton had 5 with 1 on target.
The People's Hero Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 One on target and one goal? Christ, they're efficient!
Trumpet Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 For what it's worth we had 10 shots with 2 on target. Soton had 5 with 1 on target. And that is just not good enough, 10 shots, 2 on target - no goals... what do we need?? 30 shots 6 on target 1 goal??? We always have plenty of shots and the opposite team has 4 and score twice. We just cant finish and i dont think with players like De Vries or elvis hammond we will..
The People's Hero Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 It's hard to criticise MdV and Elvis because they do work hard. Unfortunately, we're stuck with them. They didn't just decide to play for us, our previous cretin of a manager thought they were up to it and they're not.
reynard Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Just got back from the game. All over them and beat in the last minute, didn't really see much of the goal. I think we definately have to start with Fryatt and Hume upfront. We played really well today, Hammond was woeful but was the only player in my mind that let us down. Pleasantly surprised by Maybury, he was playing right midfield and it seems a good position for him to be in, played very well there I felt. Only gripe I would have that comes to mind would be that I would like to see our wide midfelders alot wider when the ball is on the opposite flank; stretch the opposition a bit and if they don't mark you out wide then you give yourself some time and space. I felt we even looked a little brighter at set pieces for the most part today. Agree about maybury but not much else. It was an awful game played by two awful sides the only difference was they had someone who could finish the one chance they had and we didn't. p[ersonally I didn't think the players wanted it enough and only maybury and stearman came out of it with much credit.
Vo Rogue Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 no he isn't but I felt he did better there than in any other position I've seen him in and also I might add, better in that position than anyone else I can remember playing on right mid. Only player who let us down today was Hammond in my eyes, not just cause he missed a good chance, he was off the ball all game and it was a welcome site to see him substituted with 20 mins to go. Nice that it wasn't left til 5-10 mins from the end before that substitute was made aswell.. Wouldn't though slotting Weslowski into Right Mid have been a better option than trying to find a space for Maybury?
Babylon Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Maybury really isn't a midfielder though is he? At least Lush has had her way now though. Lush is a woman???
The People's Hero Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 I thought so. Apologies to Lush if I've got that wrong... but I believe that Lush is female.
Anish Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Yes lush is a woman - I only figured it out a few days ago and was somewhat surprised.
The People's Hero Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 A woman with an inferiority complex I'd say if you asked me (which I appreciate you did not)
Trumpet Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Oh well, whos up for Chesterfield next year? And weve got a good chance of silverware, we are in 3 cups!! Cmon LDV!!
Babylon Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Yes lush is a woman - I only figured it out a few days ago and was somewhat surprised. Shocking. Maybe she's Rob kellys wife, he's the only other person to think maybury is a midfielder.
Cat Burger Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Today was so boring and cold. Me and my mates talked about lots of stuff during the game including imagining ourselves battering stewards, shouting after a fake lad called 'jobsy' and wanting twix's The game just couldn't match up to this.
filbertway Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 i thought when de vries came on we picked up I thought thats when they started getting back into the game to be honest.
The People's Hero Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Shocking. Maybe she's Rob kellys wife, he's the only other person to think maybury is a midfielder. I imagine her more as somebody's Mother in Law!
davieG Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 Agree about maybury but not much else. It was an awful game played by two awful sides the only difference was they had someone who could finish the one chance they had and we didn't. p[ersonally I didn't think the players wanted it enough and only maybury and stearman came out of it with much credit. The game was woeful and for me that included a very inept Maybury, not on his own mind. Pretty unadventurous team selection as well with too many defensive players and still persisting with Nissa at left back . Totally underwelmed by the whole event, the management influence, the team performance the crowd.
filbertway Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 The game was woeful and for me that included a very inept Maybury, not on his own mind. Pretty unadventurous team selection as well with too many defensive players and still persisting with Nissa at left back . Totally underwelmed by the whole event, the management influence, the team performance the crowd. To be fair nissa didn't do bad i thought.
davieG Posted 28 January 2006 Posted 28 January 2006 To be fair nissa didn't do bad i thought. Well if he had sack full of newspapers they'd end up in the wrong houses, his distribution was woeful and people have a go at Kisnorbo.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.