Tevez Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 Well i have only seen hammil a couple of times but i think he is a half decent player i have been noticing in some of the comments that hammil should get a chance on the left for city. what do you think ?
Bert Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 Well under Levein Hamill was 5hite but maybe he could come good under Kelly. We'll just have to wait and see won't we?
Milky Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 whenever i've seen him he's looked like a sunday league player to be honest. he never seems to get into the game and looks scared to death. is that down to levein? perhaps.
Tevez Posted 22 March 2006 Author Posted 22 March 2006 personally i am a fan of hammil and if kelly can turn kisnorbo into a half decent player im sure he can turn joe hammil 2 1
Cobbo Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 He's rubbish. He was even rubbish vs Oadby for God's sake.
Milky Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 He's rubbish. He was even rubbish vs Oadby for God's sake. as i said, sunday league player
Babylon Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 Carp absolute carp.... Kisnorbo wasn't great though. Maybe we should play him left back...... joke.
LCFC UK Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 personally i am a fan of hammil and if kelly can turn kisnorbo into a half decent player im sure he can turn joe hammil 2 1 True, will be intresting to see how he turns out. Not had much of a chance hear, scored a wonder goal in the cup then played shit when ever he did play
City Fan Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 I've been to every home reserve game this season, and he has been absolutely piss poor in all of them, not once had an average game never mind a good game. If he is one for the future, god help us. He can't defend or attack, worst player I have seen at the club for ages.
Jimmy Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 he seems to have the tallant but not the drive required, get rid, maybe CL will want him if he ends up back at hearts after rix was sacked
coale39 Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 This may not happen with Hamill, because he has looked shocking, but ive seen on a number of sites that hes listed as a forward? Kisnorbo transformation possible?
Tubes Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 not for me from what ive seen he is rubbish i agree sunday league player
mja Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 I don't think he's much good, not good enough for the championship anyway. I saw him play once or twice for hearts. When playing against man on man marking, not zonal, he'd make one or two decent touches and maybe beat a man and put a cross in, but that would be in a five minute period of the match. He'd then drift out for the other 85 minutes, and cost the team as he would leave a full back exposed. His positional play was poor when he didn't have the ball. I seem to remember there being little attention payed to him leaving hearts, he was perhaps getting a game because he was the only player coming through in that position who at the time was old enough (i.e. not 15/16) to be getting near the first team, given that Hearts were strapped for cash and having to bring younger players through. Doesn't explain why Levein bought him south tho?
Thracian Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 I've been to every home reserve game this season, and he has been absolutely piss poor in all of them, not once had an average game never mind a good game. If he is one for the future, god help us. He can't defend or attack, worst player I have seen at the club for ages. I thought he was a bit better than usual last night but agree 100%. Little boy lost in general.
Bert Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 I don't think he's much good, not good enough for the championship anyway. I saw him play once or twice for hearts. When playing against man on man marking, not zonal, he'd make one or two decent touches and maybe beat a man and put a cross in, but that would be in a five minute period of the match. He'd then drift out for the other 85 minutes, and cost the team as he would leave a full back exposed. His positional play was poor when he didn't have the ball. I seem to remember there being little attention payed to him leaving hearts, he was perhaps getting a game because he was the only player coming through in that position who at the time was old enough (i.e. not 15/16) to be getting near the first team, given that Hearts were strapped for cash and having to bring younger players through. Doesn't explain why Levein bought him south tho? De Vries had just rejected his latest advance, that's why.
Nationwider Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 personally i am a fan of hammil and if kelly can turn kisnorbo into a half decent player im sure he can turn joe hammil 2 1 Kisnorbo's not been turned into anything. He's just being played in what is his preferred, and probably his only position. Hamill lit up the early stages of our scintillating League Cup run this season. Other than that, he's looked out of his depth on the occasions when I've seen him. L1 at best.
Bert Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 Kisnorbo's not been turned into anything. He's just being played in what is his preferred, and probably his only position. Hamill lit up the early stages of our scintillating League Cup run this season. Other than that, he's looked out of his depth on the occasions when I've seen him. L1 at best. Yep i also think he'd be best in L1 on Saturdays too, maybe he could start a few chants off .
Nationwider Posted 22 March 2006 Posted 22 March 2006 Yep i also think he'd be best in L1 on Saturdays too, maybe he could start a few chants off . After Saturday, he could start his own chant! "Meeeee, I used to be shite, but now I'm alright. Meeeee..." etc.
City Fan Posted 23 March 2006 Posted 23 March 2006 I thought he was a bit better than usual last night but agree 100%. Little boy lost in general. He probably was slightly better but still unbelievably rubbish, he just seems very lazy all the time.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.