Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

Does anyone admit to not reading the posts on here?

Recommended Posts

Posted

I only ask because there seems to be so many duplications, e.g

Sun / Matty Piper's & Maybury to Sunderland have both been posted at least 3 times!

I know it can't be totally eliminated and I might even have done it myself but have a quick shufty at the topic titles before posting, I don't want to spend my time merging posts.

Thanks in advance!

Posted

I only ask because there seems to be so many duplications, e.g

Sun / Matty Piper's & Maybury to Sunderland have both been posted at least 3 times!

I know it can't be totally eliminated and I might even have done it myself but have a quick shufty at the topic titles before posting, I don't want to spend my time merging posts.

Thanks in advance!

Agreed. :thumbup:

Luckily my posts are so shite unique that no would ever dream of duplicating some of the dross in them :P:whistle:

Posted

Agreed. :thumbup:

Luckily my posts are so shite unique that no would ever dream of duplicating some of the dross in them :P:whistle:

Yea, absolutely...damnNo way KM! It's because no one could reproduce your dry laconic stylings :D

Posted

Why thank you Sir :thumbup:

*scrambles to dictionary.com to look up laconic* :ph34r:

You need a thing like I've got.

I can highlight a word, right click, and I have an option Dictionary search for "[Highlighted word].

Helps me look proper intelligent, sometimes.

Posted

I read majority of titles to be honest and if i don't see any relevance with what i have to say i'll start a new topic.

Posted

I don't read all the post's I just pick the ones I want to read. But whenever I post something about LCFC I always check if it has already been posted first, I think I did post a story that had already be posted sometime last week, but I did check before I posted and I couldn't see the story anywhere before I posted it, I obviously just didn't look good enough.

Posted

I read majority of titles to be honest and if i don't see any relevance with what i have to say i'll start a new topic.

Yeah, similar thing here.

If there's no title which suggests what I'm posting then I'll post away.

I AM the law, fact.

Posted

Yeah, similar thing here.

If there's no title which suggests what I'm posting then I'll post away.

I AM the law, fact.

If you really were the LAW, you'd do the decent thing and put the **** back in S****horpe :whistle:

Posted

Yeah, similar thing here.

If there's no title which suggests what I'm posting then I'll post away.

I AM the law, fact.

Just like the Weso.Hume picture incident. :thumbup:

Posted
' date='Aug 13 2006, 08:25 PM' post='372597']

You need a thing like I've got.

I can highlight a word, right click, and I have an option Dictionary search for "[Highlighted word].

Helps me look proper intelligent, sometimes.

Wow, I have that too - and I found out that I got laconic all wrong :blush:

Waggish and whimsical would have been much better!

Posted

I think you should be naming names davieG. ;):thumbup::whistle:

yes the public must be told , who would not want to know if they were living next door to an indiscriminate topic starter, :unsure:

Posted

I probably shouldn't but i only read posts by certain people. I hardly start threads though so i'm ok there, although i think i read somewhere something about duplicating threads?

Posted

yes the public must be told , who would not want to know if they were living next door to an indiscriminate topic starter, :unsure:

I think the government should stop letting them in and giving them jobs and council houses. :mad:

Posted
can someone precis this thread.. i just cant be ar5ed reading it.?

Hard to make it shorter but here goes:

thrd, I've removed the vowels but that seems to lose the essence of the word. does that help or should we stick to Thread.

Posted

Quick everyone - I've found one over here. Stone him! Stone him!

Sorry women arent allowed at the stonings.... All I said was that meal was good enough for Jehovah! :ph34r:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...