Toby or not Toby Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 did i hear right, a change of formation, 3-4-3
JoeyB Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Feck me Kelly going attacking 3-4-3 Maybury off Fryatt on its only about 30 mins to late kelly
Thracian Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Fvcking sh1t.Even when we are in a winning/drawing position we cannot hold onto anything. Out. That's a lack of genuine, organising leadership. 3-4-3 with Fryatt instead of Maybury.
Head Honcho Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Could be worse he could bring Fryatt on! Oh Shit!
Bert Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Feck meKelly going attacking 3-4-3 Maybury off Fryatt on its only about 30 mins to late kelly Don't you mean 7 months?
Master Fox Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Why didn't any of us have a bet on 3-2 to them? Because we're all idiots. Why do we still support Leicester?
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 told you so....But i suppose it wasn't hard to predict You can't say you didn't wake up this morning knowing we'd give away sloppy goals and lose, it's become a habit for this current crop. These players need a boot up the arse like last season, get rid of Kelly before it's too late
lookwhaticando Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 haha who sent in that text?Confess here and now What was it? did i hear right, a change of formation, 3-4-3 Yes... Stears, Kisnorbo, Kenton at the back, Hammond, Fryatt, Hume up front and the same four that played for the last 15. What the fock is going on at Molinuex Mick McCarthy's managerial masterclass.
Bert Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Because we're all idiots. Why do we still support Leicester? Because we're all idiots.
Thracian Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Feck meKelly going attacking 3-4-3 Maybury off Fryatt on its only about 30 mins to late kelly Eight minutes of attacking commitment. He'll need tranquilisers.
City_4_Life Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Why didn't any of us have a bet on 3-2 to them? I was actually thinking about it, but i thought hang on we might be able to get a point at Stoke. More fool me.
lookwhaticando Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Eight minutes of attacking commitment. He'll need tranquilisers. Is that before or after he uses a whole bog roll trying to stop his nose bleed?
Daggers Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 What a lovely afternoon I had...didn't watch it, didn't listen to it, know nothing about it beyond the score and Elvis finding the cows arse. Think I'll go back to my kitchen now
Master Fox Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 He has magic balls It's true. My balls are magic
JoeyB Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Kelly needs to pull his head out his own arse and give the team a fully battering, but i bet he's say c;mon lads were not playing well we can do this, but lets be honest, Maybury & Jarret are both crap and were not going to win if there playing.Kelly out I knew i was right
lookwhaticando Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 It's eerily similar to an event I remember in the dark last days of Levein's reign. Against Plymouth for the last 5 or 10 minutes, he went with four up front in a last ditch attempt to grab an equalizer. Twenty four hours later, he was out of a job. Deja Vu, anyone?
Wils Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Were losing. Ipswich are winning. Bollocks. Kelly out.
lookwhaticando Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 What a lovely afternoon I had...didn't watch it, didn't listen to it, know nothing about it beyond the score and Elvis finding the cows arse. Think I'll go back to my kitchen now Make me a sandwich. Thanks. --- Elvis Hammond Iain Hume caught offside.
Phube Posted 31 March 2007 Posted 31 March 2007 Were losing. Ipswich are winning bollocks. How do you win them then!!!!???
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.