James. Posted 23 May 2007 Posted 23 May 2007 I want to know a bit more about you lot. Let's start with age.
James. Posted 23 May 2007 Author Posted 23 May 2007 Firmly within the Boxers age range. I am on the outer limits. Preparing for Y-Fronts.
Wezleylowski Posted 23 May 2007 Posted 23 May 2007 Panties for me i am afraid. I have always thought they enhance your package size so its fine
The People's Hero Posted 23 May 2007 Posted 23 May 2007 Form an orderly queue. Why I thought I needed 2 posts for this, I just don't know.
Floating Fox Posted 23 May 2007 Posted 23 May 2007 Top End of the pants, Sort of Calvin Klein, but in Pants
AoWW Posted 23 May 2007 Posted 23 May 2007 I want to know a bit more about you lot.Let's start with age. But there are no girlie options... gutted!
lookwhaticando Posted 23 May 2007 Posted 23 May 2007 But there are no girlie options... gutted! Incontinence pads can't be far off. I'm in for a right bollocking for that one!
AoWW Posted 23 May 2007 Posted 23 May 2007 Incontinence pads can't be far off. I'm in for a right bollocking for that one! Right bollocking doesn't come into it... I just hope you're not particularly fond of either of 'em. :pinch:
Lillehamring Posted 24 May 2007 Posted 24 May 2007 ha, where are all the incontinence guys hiding - i know of at least a couple. yeah, you know who you are! ***clings desparately to what remains of his y-fronts***
Finnegan Posted 24 May 2007 Posted 24 May 2007 Not sure I like being thrown in with these teenage layabouts. Finn be 21, aye.
Master Fox Posted 24 May 2007 Posted 24 May 2007 I am on the outer limits. Preparing for Y-Fronts. I've even found a pair i like ... They have a picture of A fox on them.
James. Posted 24 May 2007 Author Posted 24 May 2007 I'm sure I'm not the only one excited by the Normal Distribution Curve evident in the poll results. Err. Anyway. I'll sort out poll number 2 in the consensus shortly.
lookwhaticando Posted 24 May 2007 Posted 24 May 2007 I'm sure I'm not the only one excited by the Normal Distribution Curve evident in the poll results. Err. Anyway. I'll sort out poll number 2 in the consensus shortly. I'd say it's reasonably normal, albeit slightly skewed to the right (obviously you have to look at the screen sideways to see that). Still, as far as analysis goes, you could get away with assuming normality based on the large-ish sample size. Exciting, isn't it?
James. Posted 24 May 2007 Author Posted 24 May 2007 I'd say it's reasonably normal, albeit slightly skewed to the right (obviously you have to look at the screen sideways to see that). Still, as far as analysis goes, you could get away with assuming normality based on the large-ish sample size. Exciting, isn't it? Shall I work out the confidence intervals and standard deviation or do you want to?
lookwhaticando Posted 24 May 2007 Posted 24 May 2007 Shall I work out the confidence intervals and standard deviation or do you want to? I'll let you have a fair crack at the whip. I'll have answers standing by, just in case. We looking at 90, 95 or 99%? Could do something different and go for 98% instead, but that might just look weird.
AoWW Posted 24 May 2007 Posted 24 May 2007 I'll let you have a fair crack at the whip.I'll have answers standing by, just in case. We looking at 90, 95 or 99%? Could do something different and go for 98% instead, but that might just look weird. Dull, I tell 'ye!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.