Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Bryn

Team for Charlton

By Bryn, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Bryn

Bryn

Posted
Posted

Gonna be an interesting one I think. Wesolowski will be out by the sounds of it and it also sounds like a number of our players are quite tired. I think this will be even more so than Forest a sign of Megson's intentions, and I think we'll go out looking to steal the win off them.

I'd play this;

Fulop



Chambers McAuley Kisnorbo Sheehan

Kaebi King Clemence Ferreira

Hume Fryatt

Subs; Henderson, Mattock, Stearman, Campbell, De Vries

For some reason I really think Hume and Fryatt will be the right partnership at Charlton. Fryatt definately deserves a start. If Thracian is right King is the best replacement for Wesolowski. Chambers and Kaebi should form a hugely penetrative right hand side, and Sheehan has attributes that make him our current best option at left-back, with Ferreira finally showing his face. N'Gotty and De Vries (who is less effective in an away setup it seems) get rests, with Stearman on the bench rather than N'Gotty because he provides more options.

However, I think Megson will go with;

Fulop



Chambers McAuly Kisnorbo Mattock

Hume Kishishev Clemence Sheehan

De Vries Fryatt

Wezleylowski

Wezleylowski

Posted
Posted

Fulop



Chambers McAuly Kisnorbo Mattock

Kaebi Kishishev Clemence Sheehan

Hume Fryatt

Thats what i would play. I think we should give Hume and Fryatt another go up top. With decent players backing them up they could get goals, and with Fryatt looking sharp and DJ looking shit why not.

Tommeh

Tommeh

Posted
Posted

---------------------Fulop----------------------

Chambers--Kisnorbo--McAuley--Sheehan

Hume--Clemence--Wesolowski--Ferreira

----------------Fryatt---De Vries------------

obviously in hoping Wesolwski is fit, if he isn't kishishev would be the obvious replacement.

Joe.

Joe.

Posted
Posted
---------------------Fulop----------------------

Chambers--Kisnorbo--McAuley--Sheehan

Hume--Clemence--Wesolowski--Ferreira

----------------Fryatt---De Vries------------

Wouldn't argue with that :thumbup:

Simi

Simi

Posted
Posted

Fulop

Chambers

Kisnorbo

McAuley

Sheehan

Kaebi

Clemence

Weso (?) Kish

Ferreia

Hume

De Vries/Cort

I hope we don't go into this game in seach of a point. These are games we've got to be going into looking to get wins if we want to be up there, come the end of the season. Sadly I think we will see a much less attacking team than this, especially the wingers.

Having to defend against the likes of Reid, I think it's important Chambers plays at right back as N Gotty could be exposed for pace.

De Vries didn't have the best of games last night, either him or Cort need to start though I think.

Lillehamring

Lillehamring

Posted
Posted

fulop



chambers - (mcaully or n'gotty) - kisnorbo - mattock

ferriera (if he has a good ressies game) - kishishev - clem - sheehan

fryatt - hume

kaebi just won't play, stearman may have done enough to oust chambers, but as it's away i think chambers is a more solid choice.

mattock, had a good solid game so why change, especially as, by most accounts, he linked up well with sheehan.

kishishev is the natural replacement for weso, chambers was hobson's choice at forest.

campbell & devries, just don't seem to be performing (at least they sounded pish at forest) fryatt must have done enough in ressies and last night - also not in tonights team so likely to feature somewhere...

only one that might be doubtful is ferriera, the fact that he was on the bench suggests he's defo in the picture, if he doesn't make it, i guess chambers, with stearman at the back...

but the above is what i'd like to see.

thank you

Simi

Simi

Posted
Posted

fulop



chambers - (mcaully or n'gotty) - kisnorbo - mattock

ferriera (if he has a good ressies game) - kishishev - clem - sheehan

fryatt - hume

kaebi just won't play, stearman may have done anough to oust chambers, but as its away i think chambers is a more solid choice.

campbell & devries, just don't seem to be performing (at least they sounded pish at forest) fryat must have done enough in ressies and last night - also not in tonights team so likely to feature somewhere...

I'd think the reason Fryatt isn't involved tonight is because he was involved last night? :unsure:

Lamby

Lamby

Posted
Posted

I reckon Charltons team will be

Weaver

Mills--Bougherra--McCarthy--Fortune

Ambrose--Semedo--Reid--Sam

Todorov--Varney

lcfc_thefoxes

lcfc_thefoxes

Posted
Posted

---------------------------Fulop-------------------------------

Chambers-------Kisnorbo------N'Gotty---------Sheehan

Kaebi------------Clemence------Kishishev------Porter

------------------Hume------------Campbell----------------

Subs:

Henderson

Mcauley

Ferreira

Mattock

Cort

Lillehamring

Lillehamring

Posted
Posted
I'd think the reason Fryatt isn't involved tonight is because he was involved last night? :unsure:

hmmm, that's a very well reasoned observation....

Micky Ruddle

Micky Ruddle

Posted
Posted

GK: Fulop

RB N'Gotty **

CB: Kisnorbo

CB: McAuley **

LB: Mattock

RM: Hume

CM: Weso (if fit) or Kishishev

CM: Clemence ©

LM: Sheehan

FW: de Vries

FW: DJ Campbell

**

** Either McAuley at RB and Bruno at CB or vice versa

Moreton

Moreton

Posted
Posted

Fulop



Chambers McAuley Kisnorbo Mattock

Hume Kish/Weso-(if fit) Clemence Sheehan

De vries Carl Cort

Subs: Henderson, Stearman, Hayes or Kaebi, Ferreira, Dj

I dunno

Thracian

Thracian

Posted
Posted

I have assumed that Wesolowski won't be fit.

Fulop;

Chambers, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Mattock;

Kaebi, King, Clemence, Sheehan;

Fryatt, DeVries.

Subs: Henderson, Stearman, Porter, Hume, Campbell.

Difficult away game.

I've retained the two big strong centre-backs rather than introducing Stearman because, with DeVries, they might snatch a goal from set pieces.

Chambers and Kaebi would give us passing pace on the right and, although tempted to play Hume/Fryatt up front I really feel we'll need a big man to hold the ball and to perhaps benefit from sheehan's crosses. DeVries remains preferable to Cort in that role.

King would have freedom to play in the hole behind Hume and DeVries with Sheehan covering and providing supplementary attacking back-up.

King's presence will give us good passing and scoring potential in midfield with the result that we really would have enough attacking potential to win the match. He is also a perfectly capable defender when required and not the sort to panic coming out from the back.

Fryatt is included in preference to Hume and Campbell because his runs seem to suit King, because he's probably our second best forward aerially and because I rather fancy a MON type option of launching McAuley, Kisnorbo, DeVries, King and Fryatt into the box at set plays.

A rest on the bench won't do Hume any harm. Porter could be a replacement in central or wide midfield with Stearman to come on at centre-back, full-back or defensive midfield.

Thracian

Thracian

Posted
Posted
---------------------------Fulop-------------------------------

Chambers-------Kisnorbo------N'Gotty---------Sheehan

Kaebi------------Clemence------Kishishev------Porter

------------------Hume------------Campbell----------------

Subs:

Henderson

Mcauley

Ferreira

Mattock

Cort

Well balanced side. Shows the sort of decent alternatives we have now.

Lillehamring

Lillehamring

Posted
Posted
I have assumed that Wesolowski won't be fit.

Fulop;

Chambers, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Mattock;

Kaebi, King, Clemence, Sheehan;

Fryatt, DeVries.

Subs: Henderson, Stearman, Porter, Hume, Campbell.

Difficult away game.

I've retained the two big strong centre-backs rather than introducing Stearman because, with DeVries, they might snatch a goal from set pieces.

Chambers and Kaebi would give us passing pace on the right and, although tempted to play Hume/Fryatt up front I really feel we'll need a big man to hold the ball and to perhaps benefit from sheehan's crosses. DeVries remains preferable to Cort in that role.

King would have freedom to play in the hole behind Hume and DeVries with Sheehan covering and providing supplementary attacking back-up.

King's presence will give us good passing and scoring potential in midfield with the result that we really would have enough attacking potential to win the match. He is also a perfectly capable defender when required and not the sort to panic coming out from the back.

Fryatt is included in preference to Hume and Campbell because his runs seem to suit King, because he's probably our second best forward aerially and because I rather fancy a MON type option of launching McAuley, Kisnorbo, DeVries, King and Fryatt into the box at set plays.

A rest on the bench won't do Hume any harm. Porter could be a replacement in central or wide midfield with Stearman to come on at centre-back, full-back or defensive midfield.

nice idea - but seriously - charlton away? - can you see megson not playing kishishev and clem in the middle of the park?

Mikey

Mikey

Posted
Posted
I have assumed that Wesolowski won't be fit.

Fulop;

Chambers, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Mattock;

Kaebi, King, Clemence, Sheehan;

Fryatt, DeVries.

Subs: Henderson, Stearman, Porter, Hume, Campbell.

Difficult away game.

I've retained the two big strong centre-backs rather than introducing Stearman because, with DeVries, they might snatch a goal from set pieces.

Chambers and Kaebi would give us passing pace on the right and, although tempted to play Hume/Fryatt up front I really feel we'll need a big man to hold the ball and to perhaps benefit from sheehan's crosses. DeVries remains preferable to Cort in that role.

King would have freedom to play in the hole behind Hume and DeVries with Sheehan covering and providing supplementary attacking back-up.

King's presence will give us good passing and scoring potential in midfield with the result that we really would have enough attacking potential to win the match. He is also a perfectly capable defender when required and not the sort to panic coming out from the back.

Fryatt is included in preference to Hume and Campbell because his runs seem to suit King, because he's probably our second best forward aerially and because I rather fancy a MON type option of launching McAuley, Kisnorbo, DeVries, King and Fryatt into the box at set plays.

A rest on the bench won't do Hume any harm. Porter could be a replacement in central or wide midfield with Stearman to come on at centre-back, full-back or defensive midfield.

Very well thought out. Good post. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...