Simi Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Check OS... Chambers and Newton in the centre, yet we let Kishishev go. Madness.
Bluefoxtim Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 I don't know whether to laugh or to cry... I thought we were having some sort of midfield crisis yet we let him out on loan? Christ almighty
Lester LXXIV Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Check OS...Chambers and Newton in the centre, yet we let Kishishev go. Madness. Clearing the decks to help pay for Drogba's huge wage demands?? <cough>
Sods Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Good, wasnt impressed by him at all. Would rather play weso or king.
Simi Posted 23 October 2007 Author Posted 23 October 2007 Good, wasnt impressed by him at all. Would rather play weso or king. But you'd rather have Newton as back up?
Sods Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 But you'd rather have Newton as back up? No, i would like to see another centre midfielder coming into the team. On the newton point i would keep him as well, hes not that bad of a player. I would keep him instead of kishishev.
Manwell Pablo Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Kishishev is just a converted defender anyway so he's hardly and different to Chambers or Newton.
Simi Posted 23 October 2007 Author Posted 23 October 2007 Kishishev is just a converted defender anyway so he's hardly and different to Chambers or Newton. I can understand that, but I don't see the logic of carrying on playing Chambers out of position. Kishishev is a steady player, but more than anything we're helping Leeds out again!
Sods Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 I can understand that, but I don't see the logic of carrying on playing Chambers out of position.Kishishev is a steady player, but more than anything we're helping Leeds out again! What other options has he had recently though, with clemence,king and weso all being out. Im sure those are the three idealy megson would like to be the middle. I think we are missing numbers in that depertment.
Ric Flair Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 He's not impressed me at all, which is a shame as he does have ability somewhere. I hope this means we'll be bringing in a central midfielder.
The People's Hero Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 His legs have gone. Only seen him at Charlton so strange to make that comment - he looked willing but quite simply his legs wouldn't get him where he needed to be quick enough. We're well shot of him. Having said that - it would be nice to play some central midfielder in central midfield. Kevin Nicholls anyone?
Ric Flair Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 His legs have gone.Only seen him at Charlton so strange to make that comment - he looked willing but quite simply his legs wouldn't get him where he needed to be quick enough. We're well shot of him. Having said that - it would be nice to play some central midfielder in central midfield. Kevin Nicholls anyone? He not getting in at Preston? I think we need a touch of the Mendieta's.
Geo V Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Im surprised he has gone considering we have two CM`s only just back from injury but it must be a big slap on the back for King as GM is obviously confident enough to let Kish go with the back-up we have seemingly as good if not better? No surprise about his destination though as the Leeds lot thought he was great for them last season.
The People's Hero Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 He not getting in at Preston?I think we need a touch of the Mendieta's. See above post re: Kishishev. Mind functioning - body sadly letting him down. Mendieta = bad idea in my book. Really could go for a spot of the Nicholls' though. Should've snapped him up ages ago. Time to re-focus our efforts on luring Billy McKinlay back in to the fold. Come on Billy, John Collins has done it - I'm sure you can. Christ, Joan Collins has even turned up for a game.
Flexx Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Good move cos we've got Weso, Clem and King back from injury. We can always recall him if needed, it's just an easy way of getting match fit.
Joe. Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Pfft, can't say I'm too bothered to be honest. We do need some quality in this midfield though soon.
Tommeh Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Not a real loss. Not impressed me at all in the short time hes been here. Weso and clemence pick themselves as cm's and even if we're playing a 3 Kish would never be one of them. Hes a very defensive minded midfielder and when we're effectively playing 5 at the back anyway he has no real use. Another good move by Megson in my opinion, although why is it always Leeds we help out!!
The People's Hero Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Good move cos we've got Weso, Clem and King back from injury. We can always recall him if needed, it's just an easy way of getting match fit. That's probably what LCFC have told him too, whilst counting the seven used fivers that Wisey popped round in a brown envelope with traces of rohypnol in the creases.
Scow Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Not too fussed really. Despite plenty of effort, he didn't seem to be with it and his distribution was poor - seemed to give the ball away in bad areas quite often. As for loaning players to Leeds, I can only think Mandaric likes Bates - I seem to remember Mandaric opposing the 15 point deduction placed on Leeds, albeit expressed after him being the only chairman not able to make the meeting that decided the punishment.
Dames Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Why oh why are we helping Leeds and Dennis Wise. I'm surprised he has the balls to come sniffing around here for players after what he did.
MPH Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 I can understand that, but I don't see the logic of carrying on playing Chambers out of position.Kishishev is a steady player, but more than anything we're helping Leeds out again! what is it with megson and right backs and right wingbacks? isnt he looking to try Kaebi in that role as well?
MPH Posted 23 October 2007 Posted 23 October 2007 Not too fussed really. Despite plenty of effort, he didn't seem to be with it and his distribution was poor - seemed to give the ball away in bad areas quite often.As for loaning players to Leeds, I can only think Mandaric likes Bates - I seem to remember Mandaric opposing the 15 point deduction placed on Leeds, albeit expressed after him being the only chairman not able to make the meeting that decided the punishment. " Master Bates! What a wa**er!, what a wa**er" " Master Bates! What a wa**er! what a wa**er"
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.