davieG Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 5 Stearman 4 Kisnorbo 5 McAuley 5 N'Gotty 5 Mattock 4 Kenton 5 Clemence 5 Fryatt 4 Cort 4 Campbell 5 Weso 5 Johns 4 Hume 4
Flynny Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 6 Stearman - 4.5 Kisnorbo - 6 McAuley - 6 N'Gotty - 6 Mattock - 4 Kenton - 6.5 Clemence - 4 Fryatt - 5.5 Cort - 2 Campbell - 4.5 Weso - 6 John - 4 Hume - 5.5
WetFlannel Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 5Stearman 4 Kisnorbo 5 McAuley 5 N'Gotty 5 Mattock 4 Kenton 5 Clemence 5 Fryatt 4 Cort 4 Campbell 5 Weso 5 Johns 4 Hume 4 id go with that but maybe kenton a 6 as he wasnt completely woeful
Lovejoy Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 5 Stearman 5 Kisnorbo 5 McAuley 4 N'Gotty 5 Mattock 4 Kenton 5 Clemence 4 Fryatt 3 Cort 4 Campbell 5 Weso 4 John 4 Hume 4
Jimmy Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 5Stearman 4 Kisnorbo 5 McAuley 5 N'Gotty 5 Mattock 4 Kenton 5 Clemence 5 Fryatt 4 Cort 4 Campbell 5 Weso 5 Johns 4 Hume 4 i'd go with that
TheBlinding Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 4s all round Maybe a 5 for Kenton because he looked like he cared
Milky Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 I haven't seen Kisnorbo take much stick at all. It was his fault for the goal.
ASH17LCFC Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 4 - Crap kicking and played pretty poor Stearman 0 - CRAP Kisnorbo 6 - Did his job McAuley 6 - Did his job N'Gotty 6 - Did his job Mattock 5 - Looked lively at the start and then faded and didnt care Kenton 5 - Tried Clemence 4 - Nothing Fryatt 3 - idot, moaning at the ref non stop Cort 0 - CRAP Campbell 4 - Not good enough Weso 4 - Nothing Johns 2 - Nothing Hume 5 - Nothing great
Koke Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Stearman- 4 Midfield + strikers- 4 Defenders + keeper- 5 Kenton- 6
Milky Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Kisnorbo 6 - Did his job So his job is getting easily turned and letting them score? Interesting. More at fault than Stearman today it could be said.
Leicester Lass Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 6 Stearman 5 Kisnorbo 5 McAuley 5 N'Gotty 5 Mattock 5 Kenton 6 Clemence 5 Fryatt 5 Cort 4 Campbell 4 Weso 5 John 4 Hume 5
Nath Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 5 (Dodgey kicking, lack of communication with defence at times) Stearman 4 (Hoof) Kisnorbo 5 (Steadyish) McAuley 4 (Off pace) N'Gotty 6 (Stong as ever, very demanding) - Best defender today Mattock 6 (Steady performance Kenton 7 (MOTM, why he was substitued, i don't know) Clemence 5 (Lacking attacking thoughts) Fryatt 4 (Out of the game today) Cort 0 (He would of been beter not actually there today) Campbell 5 (Lacked service. Looks positive though) Weso 5 (Kept things flowing) John 4 (Not best of games) Hume 4 (Not enough time to make impact)
WetFlannel Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 did fryatt actually play? i saw him turn in a full circle and do a bland pass at that was it...
Koke Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 did fryatt actually play? i saw him turn in a full circle and do a bland pass at that was it... He had one good move where he fooled two defenders and turned towards their goal. Nothing came off it though.
Bert Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 I agree with DavieG. Except Kenton, I'd give him a 6.
lcfc_jme Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop - 5 Stearman - 3 Kisnorbo - 4 McAuley - 5 N'Gotty - 5 Mattock - 4 Kenton - 6 Clemence - 5 Fryatt - 4 Cort - 4 Campbell - 4 Wesolowski - 5 John - 4 Hume - 4
David O'Leary Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 6 Stearman 4 Kisnorbo 5 McAuley 5 N'Gotty 5 Mattock 5 Kenton 5 Clemence 4 Fryatt 5 Cort 1 Campbell 5 Weso 5 Johns 4 Hume 4
lcfc_jme Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Cort - 2 Cort 0 - CRAP Cort 0 (He would of been beter not actually there today) Cort 1 I think the word " scapegoat " springs to mind considering how poor Fryatt, Stearman and John in particular were today
Yaxx Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop - Stearman - Kisnorbo - McAuley - N'Gotty - Mattock - Kenton - Clemence - Fryatt - Cort - Campbell - Weso - Johns - Hume - Burrows -
Nath Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop - 5Stearman - 3 Kisnorbo - 4 McAuley - 5 N'Gotty - 5 Mattock - 4 Kenton - 6 Clemence - 5 Fryatt - 4 Cort - 4 Campbell - 4 Wesolowski - 5 John - 4 Hume - 4 Bit harsh having them all in the minuses
Flynny Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 I think the word " scapegoat " springs to mind considering how poor Fryatt, Stearman and John in particular were today Fryatt wasn't so bad. At least he got involved, wanted the ball and made the odd run, which is more than some people. He was our only player who looked confident on the ball and yet ended up doing stuff like that silly circle run because no-one else moved. We were entirely static. Movement was utterly woeful. The coaching has to be to blame, top to bottom. Cort was actively crap rather than a bit anonymous, which John was.
lee7 Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop 6 Stearman 4 Kisnorbo 5 McAuley 4 N'Gotty 5 Mattock 4 Kenton 6 Clemence 5 Fryatt 4 Cort 4 Campbell 5 Weso 4 Johns 4 Hume 5
lee7 Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Fulop - Stearman - Kisnorbo - McAuley - N'Gotty - Mattock - Kenton - Clemence - Fryatt - Cort - Campbell - Weso - Johns - Hume - Burrows - i didn't think stearman was that bad.
Monk Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 If they can't be arsed to play then I can't be arsed to rate them. I can slate them though. I'd single out: Fryatt - Lost cause, no position Cort - just useless Stearman - doesnt realise he can go beyond the half way line Clemence - awful positional sense, sat far to close to the defence. Poor passing, no tackling. Burrows - 4-2-4 was a horrendous decision, we lost all shape and tactics. Stupid starting formation anyway. Thanks for the job you've done, but here's the door.
TheBlinding Posted 10 November 2007 Posted 10 November 2007 Stearman 4 i didn't think stearman was that bad. 4 is pretty bad to me?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.