Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
lookwhaticando

WBA Man of the Match

Man of the Match  

65 members have voted

  1. 1. Who?

    • Fulop
      1
    • Stearman
      2
    • McAuley
      0
    • Kisnorbo
      1
    • Mattock
      5
    • Kenton
      34
    • Wesolowski (subbed off @ 40)
      0
    • Clemence (c)
      1
    • Chambers (subbed off @ 59)
      1
    • Hume
      9
    • Cort
      5
    • King (replaced Wesolowski @ 40)
      1
    • Hayes (replaced Chambers @ 59)
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought Clem was decent today.

Hume, Kenton and Chambers did well too.

Posted

I thought that most were ok but Chambers for me as he did try, but his off the ball movement is much better than I have seen from us in years. If we had a good creative midfielder with the vision to see the movement then he would have been in the game and been much more effective.

Agreed that Kenton did put himself about

Posted
I thought that most were ok but Chambers for me as he did try, but his off the ball movement is much better than I have seen from us in years. If we had a good creative midfielder with the vision to see the movement then he would have been in the game and been much more effective.

Agreed that Kenton did put himself about

I can't honestly think of any positive contribution that Chambers made today, I thought he was totally out of his depth.

Posted
who the hell has voted carl cort?? do you realised MOM means the very best player in the team in this game, not the worst??

cort didnt do too badly today...

Posted

I thought big Gaz McAuley had a very decent game today but I had to go to Kenton because he is putting in performances that I thought would be way above himself in that position.

And as much as I rate Chambers, I must admit he did look out of his depth today. He needs to be in the middle playing off the shoulder of the defender.

Posted
Five people, so far, pitting him a comfortable second. :unsure:

Yeah it seems so!

It's amazing how our opinions differ so much. It's like we all watch a different game.

Posted
I thought Clem was decent today.

Hume, Kenton and Chambers did well too.

Don't know what you were watching, i thought Clem and Stearman were the worst.

Cort was better but it's hume whos no good, Cort won a lot of headers and there wasn't a player anywhere near him.

Posted

I've gone for Kenton.

The guy is not really a midfielder, he's a back-line defender. He's not had a lot of first team football this season yet he ran himself to a standstill - literally, judging by what looked like a bout of cramp towards the end.

Furthermore he tried to be constructive, tried to find a blue shirt and tried with all he had to offer some support in attack.

He's not the fastest, not the most skillful or most inventive but he made the most of himself while others around him were sadly wanting at times.

Posted
Don't know what you were watching, i thought Clem and Stearman were the worst.

Cort was better but it's hume whos no good, Cort won a lot of headers and there wasn't a player anywhere near him.

probably because we were playing 451 for most of the game :dunno:

Posted

Kenton did well out of position. Hume looked one of the few bright sparks and as usual his effort and determination was second to none. Hume for me, just. Only just.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...