ArgyleTilIDie Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 He won't let it lie... says the plymouth fan who has joined a Leicester forum to talk about Holloway. The only reason i joined on here is to just laugh at all the comments that you leicester folk are coming out with, saying that who needs any argyle players, saying who are plymouth argyle etc. To be honest about 6-7 of our players would easily fit into your 1st team Even the likes of cherno samba and chadwick would fit in there. Its all well having the set up of a club(stadium,training ground) but improving the playing squad comes first.
davieG Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Don't recall Tit. What position did he play? I thought he played for us
Bluenose76 Posted 18 December 2007 Author Posted 18 December 2007 The only reason i joined on here is to just laugh at all the comments that you leicester folk are coming out with, saying that who needs any argyle players, saying who are plymouth argyle etc. To be honest about 6-7 of our players would easily fit into your 1st teamEven the likes of cherno samba and chadwick would fit in there. Its all well having the set up of a club(stadium,training ground) but improving the playing squad comes first. To be honest 6-7 of any team would be an improvement.
ArgyleTilIDie Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Buzsaky. Capaldi. Tit. We didnt Sell Capaldi he left on a free and yeh we are selling Buzsaky, he is too inconsitant one minute he would have a good game, the next a total crap one, but who was the person that wouldnt offer him a new contract and keep him at the club, Hollow-words
mancunianfox Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Don't you are banging your head against a brick wall. Us simpletons aren't on his wave length. I can't help it! Wheres all this naughty chair stuff come from? Have I missed something?
Babylon Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Hollow-words Most of you lot seem like Hollowheads.
WetFlannel Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 The only reason i joined on here is to just laugh at all the comments that you leicester folk are coming out with, saying that who needs any argyle players, saying who are plymouth argyle etc. To be honest about 6-7 of our players would easily fit into your 1st teamEven the likes of cherno samba and chadwick would fit in there. Its all well having the set up of a club(stadium,training ground) but improving the playing squad comes first. and we are in a better position to do that... idiot child
The Reverend Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 We didnt Sell Capaldi he left on a free and yeh we are selling Buzsaky, he is too inconsitant one minute he would have a good game, the next a total crap one, but who was the person that wouldnt offer him a new contract and keep him at the club, Hollow-words Yes Capaldi left on a free i'd of thought after re-jecting a new contract, wanting to move onto bigger and better things.
MPH Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 yeh and that is why the plymouth fans hate him so much, after saying so much about the club saying that this was his vehicle to get into the premiership, and then be pulled away by a bloke waving ££££ in front of his eyes, it wouldnt have been so bad if he just said no comment to the speculation before he joined you but no, he had to make up another load of lies and con the fans,players and club into believing him. It just shows how fickle and unloyal he is. But he will not let it lie and has constantly brought plymouth up again and again, trying to unsettle us with offering money to our players, he should learn to keep his mouth shut because hes getting himself into more deeper Sh1t and making our board not want to deal with him. Also now that leicester is struggling he is starting to lose it, at plymouth he didnt have pressure on him as are expectations were to gradually climb up the table, but now hes gone to leicester its more pressure, from the looks at it in his recent interviews he is looking like he regrets leaving plymouth, i think you just answered your own question as to why plymouth players might want to come to Leicester- for the same reason as your manager did..
WetFlannel Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 i think you just answered your own question as to why plymouth players might want to come to Leicester- for the same reason as your manager did..
MPH Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 The only reason i joined on here is to just laugh at all the comments that you leicester folk are coming out with, saying that who needs any argyle players, saying who are plymouth argyle etc. To be honest about 6-7 of our players would easily fit into your 1st teamEven the likes of cherno samba and chadwick would fit in there. Its all well having the set up of a club(stadium,training ground) but improving the playing squad comes first. and the rest!
ArgyleTilIDie Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 and we are in a better position to do that... idiot child Well it looks like that to me, the amount of players you brought in and the money you paid, if argyle had that money we would be challenging for a european spot let alone a promotion spot, you may have the money but seems to me you dont know how to use it
WetFlannel Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Well it looks like that to me, the amount of players you brought in and the money you paid, if argyle had that money we would be challenging for a european spot let alone a promotion spot, you may have the money but seems to me you dont know how to use it who used the money for you then HOLLOWAY... im loosing all hope with you lot
Jack Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Well it looks like that to me, the amount of players you brought in and the money you paid, if argyle had that money we would be challenging for a european spot let alone a promotion spot, you may have the money but seems to me you dont know how to use it Behave yourself
The Reverend Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Well it looks like that to me, the amount of players you brought in and the money you paid, if argyle had that money we would be challenging for a european spot let alone a promotion spot, you may have the money but seems to me you dont know how to use it Probably! My advice to you lot: stay away from Martin Allen.
ArgyleTilIDie Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 who used the money for you then HOLLOWAY... im loosing all hope with you lot It wasnt Hollow-words that brought in them, it was because of Bulpin and Braecker,if we had kept them he would be a nothing , Bulpin spotted Peter Crouch's potential and told him when he was young he would play for england
Bluenose76 Posted 18 December 2007 Author Posted 18 December 2007 It wasnt Hollow-words that brought in them, it was because of Bulpin and Braecker,if we had kept them he would be a nothing , Bulpin spotted Peter Crouch's potential and told him when he was young he would play for england Thought Penrice (is that his name?) was the scout?
WetFlannel Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 It wasnt Hollow-words that brought in them, it was because of Bulpin and Braecker,if we had kept them he would be a nothing , Bulpin spotted Peter Crouch's potential and told him when he was young he would play for england
Bluemoon Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 It wasnt Hollow-words that brought in them, it was because of Bulpin and Braecker,if we had kept them he would be a nothing , Bulpin spotted Peter Crouch's potential and told him when he was young he would play for england Did he ever make it?
Staf Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 I know to be fair Holloway would of had the last say about signing players
mancunianfox Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 It wasnt Hollow-words that brought in them, it was because of Bulpin and Braecker,if we had kept them he would be a nothing , Bulpin spotted Peter Crouch's potential and told him when he was young he would play for england Who both have comfy offices in the Walkers Stadium
Trav Le Bleu Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Does it not worry anyone that Milan has "apparently" told Ollie he can't have the Plymouth players, simply from THIS viewpoint... effectively Milan is saying, "they will cost too much" Well aren't we the last of the big spenders who can't even afford Pilgrims players (no offence, but they're not MU, Chelsea, or even Wolves, WBA)
Father Ted Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Plymouth fans are so pathetic they are constantly on here slating holloway GO AWAY I agree, it's such a shame because we had some nice Brentford fans and the Iranians and then we get plonkers like these
A_Non_Bitter_Pilgrim Posted 18 December 2007 Posted 18 December 2007 Yes I'm one of those Argyle fans but actually the reason why I'm posting is because after inital anger I realised that actually we got a really good deal out of the whole scenerio. To be honest, without the "greed" of Ollie and the approach by Mandaric then Paul Sturrock would never have come back to Argyle. To me, Leicester City Football Club got what they wanted in terms of a man that will sort them out. He has a great back up team and one key person is Penrice and I'm sure he will bring in the right people who will add much needed quality to your team. Ollie has alot of passion. He is a motivator who is very postive as a manager. He did a very good job at PAFC and if I forget about alot of the stuff that comes out of his mouth then I realise he still did a very good job on a limited budget. However, he is not fantastic as a tactical manager. He only knows how to play one way and whilst being postive gets you somewhere he can be found out by more astute managers in what is a pretty average league. My concern was always that he never had a "plan B". If you get behind him though he will get you up the league although I do feel MM desire is Premiership within the next 2 years and personally I dont think Ollie has enough abilty to make you finish in the top two. When Ollie came to the club he was extremely lucky in the sense Tony Pulis before him got rid of alot of the dead-wood like I guess he has to try and do with your squad now. Pulis set the foundations and Ollie had a blank sheet to work with. He was fortunate but he did add wisely so all credit to him. However, I have been watching in amazement some of his comments about your squad and where Pulis calmly and efficently went about his work I notice Olliie taking another approach. Personally, I believe no matter how many players you get in during the window he will still be left with alot of your existing squad and to be so public about the need for change isnt, I feel, the best way to handle things. Another downside to the man is whilst he is a great talker he tends to speak before thinking and in the case I highlighted above he can only affect confidence by making it appear that alot arent wanted. Isnt it better to keep team matters private? So when I heard Paul Sturrock was coming back I was delighted. We have a manager who has a plan B. Tatically, he is alot more aware than Ollie and yet as the same ability to unite a team by its spirt and work-rate. I can see why alot of Argyle fans are bitter about the whole scenerio but my anger has always been directed at Ollie and not Leciester Fans as at the end of the day fans of football clubs dont have any say in the employment of managers. I actually do wish you the best for the season (although I would be lyeing if I wasnt going to say that their isnt part of me that really wants Ollie to fail). Life goes on though and if it wasnt for the actions of your club we wouldnt of seen our fans so united like they have been over the coming months. We also wouldnt of seen the return of one of our most popular managers. As an Argyle fan who wasnt 100% convinced by Ollie, but who did try and believe in what he was saying, this whole scenerio has benefited both clubs. I just want to wish you all a merry xmas, and look forward to getting 3pts off you come feb !!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.