Thracian Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 Absolutely. Not got a bad word to say about Kenton at the minute, the way he's played in midfield as well, is testiment to his character. I hope he's kept on as he's a valuable squad player. Tend to agree. He's quite versatile, always 100% and does try to play the ball out of defence. He's competent, he's got energy even if he's not especially fast and should fit in with the style Holloway's trying to adopt. Seems positive too. He's one of the few seniors to turn out in the reserves and he's attitude was just the same as in the first team. Spot on.
mbd123 Posted 21 December 2007 Author Posted 21 December 2007 I would keep Kisnorbo, Fulop, Hume and Clemence Fulop, McAuly, Mattock and King. Kisnorbo to Fulham. I've been thinking about it and i've come to the conclusion he is only talking about the first team squad, so some the younger players are not included, but the likes of Clemence Fryatt, Hume and Stearmen are the main contenders. I think it was said that Cort is history anyway. I'm behind Ollie on this and he is only doing what as been said thousands of times on this and other message boards. We are shocking as a team, maybe the 5 worst teams that City have ever had, have been embarressing us over the last few years. Its the time for action now and Ollie as had the balls to start it off, he won't get everything right but i'm sure he will be going in the right direction and things will start to improve very soon.
davieG Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 Fulop, McAuly, Mattock and King. Kisnorbo to Fulham. I've been thinking about it and i've come to the conclusion he is only talking about the first team squad, so some the younger players are not included, but the likes of Clemence Fryatt, Hume and Stearmen are the main contenders. I think it was said that Cort is history anyway. I'm behind Ollie on this and he is only doing what as been said thousands of times on this and other message boards. We are shocking as a team, maybe the 5 worst teams that City have ever had, have been embarressing us over the last few years. Its the time for action now and Ollie as had the balls to start it off, he won't get everything right but i'm sure he will be going in the right direction and things will start to improve very soon. In effect it's only McAuley you can't include Fulop, well not now and Mattock & King I would still class as 'younger / fringe players'
Dr The Singh Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 In effect it's only McAuley you can't include Fulop, well not now and Mattock & King I would still class as 'younger / fringe players' Mcauley is way average!! His positional sense at times and his lack of pace makes him mediocre!!! He can foook off!!
mbd123 Posted 21 December 2007 Author Posted 21 December 2007 In effect it's only McAuley you can't include Fulop, well not now and Mattock & King I would still class as 'younger / fringe players' They are the named players. So I would say that we have proberly done the deal over Fulop.
davieG Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 They are the named players. I'm not denying it just putting my interpretation on it. As I said in effect One first teamer.
Ultra Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 Maybury.Douglas. Hellings. Newton. Nielsen. I've told about eight players that I don't want them and sent them away for Christmas. So who are the other three?
Lichfieldfox. Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 Keep any under 20 and Weso, Fryatt, James Chambers, Clem (even though he has performed very poorly), Hume and DJ. Rest can be sold/listed. I would recall De Vries however for another look. December looks a grim month yet again. january the games look a little easier on paper. I'm reconsidering renewing next year already and just going to a few away games.
dandannieldanok Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 So who are the other three? I'd guess Elvis is definitely one more.
Ultra Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 I'd guess Elvis is definitely one more. Would've had to pay him off though. No-one is going to sign him if he isn't fit.
Asha Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 Would've had to pay him off though. No-one is going to sign him if he isn't fit. I think he'd be worth for a risk for a mid-table League Two side.
reynard Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 Really don't believe this. Do we really have as many as 4 players who are worth keeping excluding youngsters?
Jack Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 Really don't believe this. Do we really have as many as 4 players who are worth keeping excluding youngsters? Not if we want to go anywhere, No.
LcFc D3C Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 yes i think we do, but we need some other quality players as well to brighten up the team.
Asha Posted 21 December 2007 Posted 21 December 2007 yes i think we do, but we need some other quality players as well to brighten up the team. We need a new team. But we aint got enough time for that. They've got mistletoe to brighten up the team, players' won't neccesarily bring that. It'll make the players day that, getting a snog from Burrows. EDIT: Oh bollocks he's gone.
LCFC2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Leicester have quite a few decent players that should not be available in the transfer window and they are Kisnorbo, Clemence, Hume, Fryatt, Mattock and Chambers.
ThurmastonFox Posted 24 December 2007 Posted 24 December 2007 In the Sun football section today, Ollie is quoted as saying that there are 14 players to be cleared out and if they don't go they will train in a special area away from the first team.
Asha Posted 24 December 2007 Posted 24 December 2007 This is needed though, the squad is full of shit and needs a bit of a revamp.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.