Dr The Singh Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 I think we can do it. Maybe we should start a sign up thread?THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED. I will sign up aslong as there some pooonage going on, otherwise it will be just a 'meat' fest!!!
Zingari Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 I think we can do it. Maybe we should start a sign up thread?THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED. do it James ! i'm i bit past the "front line" stuff myself , but i'd be more than willing to answer the phone , lick envelopes , or pack parachutes and stuff not wednesdays or sundays though
BoneDog Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 If I had the chance to go abroad and earn 5 or 10 times what I would earn at home then I would go, so I don't blame any foreigner for coming here while our government allows them to. I do agree that we shouldn't let so many people in when we are such a small country but I only blame our leaders for that and no-one else. I'm sure they only do it to create tensions. Our leaders are gagging for chaos to reign on our streets so that they can come down hard and take away more of our rights. The day we start fighting in the streets is the day 'they', whoever they are, win. And I don't mean to sound racist when I say we should clamp down on immigration cos I'm all for granting asylum to anyone who needs it. After all, majority of the shit people are running from is caused by meddling of some form by Western governments (too many ways to mention).
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 I agree with this.We should build a nice safe environment for racists to chat and embrace each other. Let's create an environment for the the stupid, the prejudice and the readers of the daily mail that are voting tory because they are not brave enough to vote BNP. Unemployment - that's the immigrants; Recession that's Immigrant's too; Broken Britain - Children wearing hoods and homosexuals. Let's make Dangerous Tiger a thread where he can be prejudicial, bigoted, politically incorrect and skirt around issues of race in a nice safe environment. Nick Griffin - poor little fascist being picked on. Get a grip. Tut! Tut! Stop being purile, and grow up. Freedom of speech should be a Democratic right, as in the days when we had decent people running the country. Even a little scrote like you, would be be able to climb up on your soap box, and spout your innocuous twaddle. Freedom of speech is one thing but freedom to ridicule relentlessly, massively misguided, and disgusting little demonisers of society that prey upon the vulnerable and exploit fear, is a privilege I will never tire of. I hope the little rat has a painful accident and is nursed embarrassingly for years by those lovely people from many races that he despises, prior to a slow painful end. He makes me wretch just looking at him - give me gay men having full sex in my driveway every night over one BNP Canvasser coming to my door to peddle indoctrinated marginalised hate once per annum. Indigenous British people? You have an idea in your head and an image about what that looks like don't you? Problem is, it's more complicated than that! Christ, I bet it's a power issue - you probably dress up at weekends and play police officer. Give me strength.
Fosse Boy Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 I can't tell which bits he's answering. Can't really be bothered to trawl through the inevitable bigoted drivel anyway...
Guest Bilo Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 I don't understand either. So glad I'm not the only one.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 I can't tell which bits he's answering. Can't really be bothered to trawl through the inevitable bigoted drivel anyway... Sorry about that, but my computer was misbehaving. If you think that advocating freedom of speech is bigoted, then I must be bigoted. I can't stand N.G. or his filthy party. However, I was brought up tp believe that everyone is entitled to express a view, however wrong it may seem to others.
Fosse Boy Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 Sorry about that, but my computer was misbehaving.If you think that advocating freedom of speech is bigoted, then I must be bigoted. I can't stand N.G. or his filthy party. However, I was brought up tp believe that everyone is entitled to express a view, however wrong it may seem to others. Even to the extreme of allowing him to spout hatred for his fellow man based on the colour of his skin, on national television?
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 Even to the extreme of allowing him to spout hatred for his fellow man based on the colour of his skin, on national television? He was invited to appear, and we all know what he is. So the answer is yes. It's called Democracy. He is intolerant and bigoted, but by refusing him his right, we would also be the same.
James. Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 He was invited to appear, and we all know what he is. So the answer is yes. It's called Democracy.He is intolerant and bigoted, but by refusing him his right, we would also be the same. Must say, I completely agree. It is only by exposing such views that progress can be made.
davieG Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 Even to the extreme of allowing him to spout hatred for his fellow man based on the colour of his skin, on national television? I would have thought if he did that it would serve a much greater service than preventing him as people would be able to see what he really stands for. Unfortunately so many of the panellists preferred the sound of their own voice thus preventing him from exposing his nasty self more fully.
Dr The Singh Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 I would have thought if he did that it would serve a much greater service than preventing him as people would be able to see what he really stands for.Unfortunately so many of the panellists preferred the sound of their own voice thus preventing him from exposing his nasty self more fully. Exactly, a more analytical debate was required, yet the panel were more interested in selling there party manifestos!!
davieG Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 Exactly, a more analytical debate was required, yet the panel were more interested in selling there party manifestos!! themselves!
Daggers Posted 26 October 2009 Posted 26 October 2009 How come most BNP members who like to claim that "we're full" look like they've never uttered that phrase at mealtimes?
Zingari Posted 27 October 2009 Posted 27 October 2009 Does anyone else feel as though we in the UK are just treated as lab rats ? Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...er-adviser.html
Webbo Posted 27 October 2009 Posted 27 October 2009 Cba to read 23 pages so apologies if this has already been posted.
Thracian Posted 27 October 2009 Posted 27 October 2009 Does anyone else feel as though we in the UK are just treated as lab rats ?Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...er-adviser.html There was no mandate for this whatsoever. It was totally irresponsible in terms of scale and was an insult to all the English people who were so disgracefully displaced. Their individual suffering and that of their families was and is down to those responsible for what was often blatant anti-white racism. In time to come I hope each and every person responsible will be forced to answer for their actions. As for Tony Blair being supported as EU president, nothing could be more obscene. He should be answering for so many of the dead and injured in Iraq. For him to even call himself a Christian is to mock the word. I have nothing against multi-cultural societies at all - but they should evolve and should not be contrived at other people's expense.
Daggers Posted 27 October 2009 Posted 27 October 2009 they should evolve It is. Do you comprehend the meaning of the term? Evolution takes place at the expense of the less biologically fit. Cheerio bigots.
Thracian Posted 28 October 2009 Posted 28 October 2009 It is. Do you comprehend the meaning of the term?Evolution takes place at the expense of the less biologically fit. Cheerio bigots. It has been contrived and the fact has been admitted. The irresponsiblity has caused endless despair in so many ways and has absolutely nothing to do with the biologically fit and a lot more to do with people in power weighting the dice unfairly. Unfortunately it is another fact that decent people are always the last to know when their basic decency is being taken advantage of. Like so many Germans who fell under the spell of Hitler. He weighted the dice too. As did the revolutionaries of Soviet Russia and China under Chairman Mao. Even more shamefully I'll admit but as a means to an social end nevertheless.
Thracian Posted 28 October 2009 Posted 28 October 2009 Does anyone else feel as though we in the UK are just treated as lab rats ?Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...er-adviser.html What's worse it seems that Labour has an army of teachers strategically and advantageously placed in the classrooms to support and encourage their social "experiments". If only teachers were as wise as they think they are clever.
Daggers Posted 28 October 2009 Posted 28 October 2009 What's worse it seems that Labour has an army of teachers strategically and advantageously placed in the classrooms to support and encourage their social "experiments". Exactly what social experiment are teachers supporting and encouraging in the classroom? As well as demonstrating your wholesale lack of understanding about biology & evolution, let's have your inane ramblings about education practices and how they are at the heart of society's ills... ...come on, we really want to read them.
BoneDog Posted 28 October 2009 Posted 28 October 2009 Evolution has nothing to do with deleting bigotry! If there is such a thing as evolution then am I right in thinking that it is supposed to kill off the weak? Because from what I've learnt over the years is that most deaths seems to occur from man made problems i.e starvation and other preventable problems or war. Nothing to do with evolution. And if evolution is an amazing natural programme that will wittle down bigots then it hasn't done a very good job in the last million years cos I'd say there are more bigots now than ever. The only thing that seems to be happening is that more ignoranuses are appearing on this earth if anything. And the only people left one day will be the ones with most bombs and money. That's not evolution. That's just evil men who are willing to do anything to gain more power ruling the world. Or fascism.
Tabou Posted 28 October 2009 Posted 28 October 2009 If there is such a thing as evolution then am I right in thinking that it is supposed to kill off the weak? Because from what I've learnt over the years is that most deaths seems to occur from man made problems i.e starvation and other preventable problems or war. Nothing to do with evolution. It could be argued that Starvation is not a Man Made problem, more an oversight in not properly contructing the Entire world to have water/soil/vegetation by whichever God you choose to believe in . Swings and roundabouts, this religion vs evolution bollocks.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.