Koke Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 The whole thing was a witch hunt against one person from all sides including Dimbleby. Everyone came out as utter tools. This is was a perfect time to expose Griffin and his policies about EU, ethnic minorities, other domestic policies etc. but it was just one monumental fuck-up. It would have been better if Griffin was alone on the panel with Dimbleby and answered the questions without being interrupted constantly. Verdict: Spending that time watching online porn would have been more productive.
davieG Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 The whole thing was a witch hunt against one person from all sides including Dimbleby. Everyone came out as utter tools. This is was a perfect time to expose Griffin and his policies about EU, ethnic minorities, other domestic policies etc. but it was just one monumental fook-up. It would have been better if Griffin was alone on the panel with Dimbleby and answered the questions without being interrupted constantly. Verdict: Spending that time watching online porn would have been more productive. ...and another monumental fook-up
Tommy G Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Correct-a-mundo.The problem is obviously that the BNP are just crazy to be perfectly honest. Alot of people watching tonight would think that Griffin is an idiot, but he's not. He is quite an intelligent block but he's a maniac. The black woman (forgot her name) who was on the panel was annoying, she contributed nothing really and was a waste of time. I think he's either an oxford or cambridge grad so he's not thick. I don't think he came off too bad considering every man and his dog were against him including the panel. Also if you noticed the audience had a high proportion of ''non white'' people without sounding too racist which cannot of helped his cause. Jack Straw is a waste of a chair space on that panel and the asian lady got on my tits. I think they should have invited that Al Qaeda bloke with the hook hand on the panel. Would have kicked off probably and made it more interesting than straw and giffin side stepping all questions Dimbleby is a hero
vanfox12 Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 The Mail and Express can nosh on my cock. For years they've produced papers full of the kind of xenophobic half-truths, exaggeration and spin that turn people towards the BNP because they know sensationalism sells. Then they get a wee bit uncomfortable when they realise half their readership now votes for the cvnts so try to turn back the clock by throwing a bit of mud at them. It aint gunna work. The Express's website isn't taking comments on it's front page piece today because they most of their readers would tell them to fvck off. If you read the comments pages most days in the Leicester Mercury you would think you were reading the Daily Mail, having said that the Mercury is owned by the Daily Mail group.
maddog Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 I think he's either an oxford or cambridge grad so he's not thick.I don't think he came off too bad considering every man and his dog were against him including the panel. Also if you noticed the audience had a high proportion of ''non white'' people without sounding too racist which cannot of helped his cause. Jack Straw is a waste of a chair space on that panel and the asian lady got on my tits. I think they should have invited that Al Qaeda bloke with the hook hand on the panel. Would have kicked off probably and made it more interesting than straw and giffin side stepping all questions Dimbleby is a hero That sounded wrong.
Jon the Hat Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 I think he's either an oxford or cambridge grad so he's not thick.I don't think he came off too bad considering every man and his dog were against him including the panel. Also if you noticed the audience had a high proportion of ''non white'' people without sounding too racist which cannot of helped his cause. Jack Straw is a waste of a chair space on that panel and the asian lady got on my tits. I think they should have invited that Al Qaeda bloke with the hook hand on the panel. Would have kicked off probably and made it more interesting than straw and giffin side stepping all questions Dimbleby is a hero Cambridge. "non white" people in West London? Incredible it must be a setup.
Guest Mee-9 Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 What a farce. The whole show was an attack on the BNP and Nick Griffin. Yes he has said some awful things, and his policies might not be politically correct, But i tuned in to see Griffins opinions on the news. E.g Postal strike. Not a whole show dedicated to the BNP, and 5 minutes dedicated to Jan Moir's article in the Daily mail.
Fosse Boy Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Just out of interest, where is this drawbridge that lets immigrants in? I've never seen it and imagine that it must be quite a miraculous bit of construction.
Guest Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Just out of interest, where is this drawbridge that lets immigrants in? I've never seen it and imagine that it must be quite a miraculous bit of construction. Oh it is.
Thracian Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Oh it is. Wherever it is, it's about as well maintained as the roads cos it's permanently in the down position and obviously incapable of being lifted.
Fosse Boy Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Wherever it is, it's about as well maintained as the roads cos it's permanently in the down position and obviously incapable of being lifted. Maybe we should construct a giant portcullis just to be on the safe side?
Ford Super Sunday Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Wherever it is, it's about as well maintained as the roads cos it's permanently in the down position and obviously incapable of being lifted. If it's not maintained well then the local council where the bridge is located may seek to demolish it because of its state of disrepair...
Dr The Singh Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 The whole thing was a witch hunt against one person from all sides including Dimbleby. Everyone came out as utter tools. This is was a perfect time to expose Griffin and his policies about EU, ethnic minorities, other domestic policies etc. but it was just one monumental fuck-up. It would have been better if Griffin was alone on the panel with Dimbleby and answered the questions without being interrupted constantly. Verdict: Spending that time watching online porn would have been more productive. Exactly, they made the whole thing a personal attack rather then a debate on issues!!
maddog Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 What did, explain? I was calling my own post for sounding wrong so i edited it straight away to that sounded wrong Which is why my original post was made at 04.24 and edited at 04.25
Guest Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Wherever it is, it's about as well maintained as the roads cos it's permanently in the down position and obviously incapable of being lifted. According to the National Stats, the latest version in one of my textbooks is quoted as follows. Total Population 58.7m White Population 54.2m (92%) Other ethnic groups 4.5m (8%)
Thracian Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 The right answer is that as a western woman, she wouldn't be "offending" any law. Ok, she would be expected to cover up her tattoos in public, but aside from that, the cultural differences are tolerated. I got the impression you were asking my view on a hypothetical question not taking the chance to show off your knowledge of the law in some foreign land. I wouldn't change our laws to accommodate anyone. Our laws are there - or should be there - to protect our people and our nation. The very notion of one law for some and another, modified law, for another is ridiculous. It weakens the law and sets a dangerous precedent.
Fosse Boy Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Cassetteboy is at it again Gotta love a bit of Cassetteboy.
Guest Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 I got the impression you were asking my view on a hypothetical question not taking the chance to show off your knowledge of the law in some foreign land. I wouldn't change our laws to accommodate anyone. Our laws are there - or should be there - to protect our people and our nation. The very notion of one law for some and another, modified law, for another is ridiculous. It weakens the law and sets a dangerous precedent. Seriously though, polygamy? Is that really going to lower the standards in Britain, seeing as some couples, married or not, have affairs? Or 'play the field'? Or whatever.
Fosse Boy Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Going back to the homophobia issue, good to see the Church of Sweden voting in favour of conducting same sex marriages. Fred Phelps will not be happy...
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Whatever happened to the "Freedom of Speech" that this country was once so proud of? Our Democratic right to this has been swept away by the pathos of "political correctness" and the fear of retribution for speaking, what we as individuals, believe in.
Guest Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Whatever happened to the "Freedom of Speech" that this country was once so proud of?Our Democratic right to this has been swept away by the pathos of "political correctness" and the fear of retribution for speaking, what we as individuals, believe in. You what? A racist, homophobic bigot is allowed on national TV, and you complain? Or are you taking the piss?
davieG Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Just out of interest, where is this drawbridge that lets immigrants in? I've never seen it and imagine that it must be quite a miraculous bit of construction. It's in the hands of Leicester City Council, totally unmaintained, when it's looking a bit grubby they'll get DMU to buy it off them for a penny and build a leisure centre for students & immigrants.
Corky Posted 23 October 2009 Posted 23 October 2009 Well, Griffin seems to have been "misquoted" a lot in his life. Funny how he's never complained of misquoting when these statements were first printed or aired. I didn't think he came across at all well.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.