Team against mattock's rent boys

[Jimmy]

same team as Friday for me just with N'Guessan destroying the little twat on his "home coming"

[lou]

same team as Friday for me just with N'Guessan destroying the little twat on his "home coming"

Cant change it from last night!!

[Ozwin]

Gotta be the same team, with pretty much the same tactics.

[Jimmy]

Cant change it from last night!!

I'm sure maddog will come up with a reason why Campbell absolutely HAS to start in place of Fryatt

[Vlad The Impaler]

GK. Weale

RB. Neilson

CB. Hobbs

CB. Brown

LB. Berner

RM. Oakley

CM. King

CM. Wellens

LM. N'Guessan

ST. Waghorn

ST. Fryatt

SUBS:

Logan, Kermogant, Howard, Gallagher, Dyer, Adams, Morrison

Don't change the team due to the fact that West Brom play a very similar style to QPR, if we play half as well as we did last night then we will get something out of the game.

Am pretty confident!

[Karljohn]

Brown shorts time for Mattock.

Whatever team we put out lets hope we give him an absolute battering on and off the pitch, looking forward to Dany and Waggy tearing him to bits.

[maddog]

I'm sure maddog will come up with a reason why Campbell absolutely HAS to start in place of Fryatt

No it has to be the same team, unless illness or injuries.

But Campbell should be on the bench

[Thracian]

No it has to be the same team, unless illness or injuries.

But Campbell should be on the bench

Quite agree.

[Guest]

I'm sure maddog will come up with a reason why Campbell absolutely HAS to start in place of Fryatt

And then start a poll about it

Gotta be the same starting line up as last night for me too, no sense in changing that

[Leicester Rule!]

Hope someone (Brown) snap's the ****s legs.

[Guest ttfn]

Weale

Neilson

Hobbs

Brown

Berner

N'Guessan

Oakley

Wellens

Dyer

Fryatt

Howard

I think we need to be as positive as possible and make put Mattock under as much pressure as possible. We know he's not much cop, but Oakley won't attack him like N'Guessan will. Mattock will shit his pants if N'Guessan runs at him. Harsh on King I know but we've got to attack Mattock, who is their weak link.

I'd start Howard rather than Waghorn because we're not going to pass them off the pitch. They're too good on the ball for that.

That said, I wouldn't complain if it was the same team again. We were excellent yesterday

[Ozwin]

Waghorn was awesome at closing down and not giving the QPR backline any time on the ball, Howard won't do that.

[Guest ttfn]

Waghorn was awesome at closing down and not giving the QPR backline any time on the ball, Howard won't do that.

I disagree. Howard would definitely be bombing around, he'd be seriously up for it having not played for a while.

[Koke]

I'd start Howard rather than Waghorn because we're not going to pass them off the pitch. They're too good on the ball for that.

That's nonsense though isn't it. QPR are a also very good passing side as well, and we made them look ordinary. WBA are not Arsenal. Prior to their 5-0 bumming of Watford they had won 1 in 6. Coventry kept a clean sheet against them and Swansea beat them at the Hawthorns. Good side, yes, but hardly a team that we should fear.

Plus, We subconsciously hoof it up to Howard when he's playing. It's a psychological thing. And you never change a winning side. That's rule number 1 in the management book.

[Ford Super Sunday]

Joe Mattock's friend installed my internet on Friday

Looked a bit like him too.

No joke.

But on topic, we can't change a winning team unless injuries, and I don't think any sane manager would. Same again please, if we can do that to a passing team like QPR, then we can do it to WBA, who aren't as brilliant as people thought they would be.

(on a side note it'll be nice to play a team that isn't just made up of initials soon too)

[Candidcamera]

We did change it after the Reading game so it will only be the odd change again if it happens. The fact is that we are at home and this may lead to changes. Gallagher was unlucky IMO to be left out at QPR. Fryatt is a must so he may have to wait until Waghorn is rested.

[Bluefoxtim]

We did change it after the Reading game so it will only be the odd change again if it happens. The fact is that we are at home and this may lead to changes. Gallagher was unlucky IMO to be left out at QPR. Fryatt is a must so he may have to wait until Waghorn is rested.

Although we won at Reading, it wasn't exactly a stellar performance.

I'd like the same team but with DJ on the bench (only for his pace in the last 10 minutes).

[Fox92]

Same as QPR.

[CupidStunt]

same team as QPR, and keep the same formation as we did at the start

As for Mattock, he will have a blinder, and probably score a scrambled tap in at the back post from a corner, its sods law

[FilboFox]

Same team, same performance, same result please.

[Corky]

Don't see any reason to change the side.

[Guest ttfn]

That's nonsense though isn't it. QPR are a also very good passing side as well, and we made them look ordinary. WBA are not Arsenal. Prior to their 5-0 bumming of Watford they had won 1 in 6. Coventry kept a clean sheet against them and Swansea beat them at the Hawthorns. Good side, yes, but hardly a team that we should fear.

Plus, We subconsciously hoof it up to Howard when he's playing. It's a psychological thing. And you never change a winning side. That's rule number 1 in the management book.

I appreciate what you say about West Brom's form, but if my point about WBA passing us off the pitch is made redundant by the fact that we beat QPR, surely the fact we beat QPR who were in excellent form, renders your point about the Baggies' form obsolete, as QPR were in scintillating form before Friday?

I think we'll get shat on if we try and play the same way next week. We've turned in one excellent performance in 15 games this season, and it's not going to happen every week.

I fear that the sad truth is that if we're to progress in this league, we need to be pragmatic and play to our opposition's weaknesses as much as our own strengths.

[crazylegs1984]

1: Gordon Banks

2: Cafu

3: Franz Beckenbauer

4: Bobby Moore (r.i.p)

5: Lilian Thuram

6: Obdulio Varella (captain)

7: Mane Garrincha

8: Diego Maradona

9: Pele

10: Geoff Hurst

11: Gerd Muller

im sure we could get em all on a free transfer

[Leicester Rule!]

I appreciate what you say about West Brom's form, but if my point about WBA passing us off the pitch is made redundant by the fact that we beat QPR, surely the fact we beat QPR who were in excellent form, renders your point about the Baggies' form obsolete, as QPR were in scintillating form before Friday?

I think we'll get shat on if we try and play the same way next week. We've turned in one excellent performance in 15 games this season, and it's not going to happen every week.

I fear that the sad truth is that if we're to progress in this league, we need to be pragmatic and play to our opposition's weaknesses as much as our own strengths.

Got to agree with that.

Yes, we should play to our own strengths, but if we can pinpoint a weakness that we can capitalise on, then we need to. Thats why management watch loads of video's of their opponents before they play.

[muffin]

Although we won at Reading, it wasn't exactly a stellar performance.

I'd like the same team but with DJ on the bench (only for his pace in the last 10 minutes).

D J is way to lightweight and is always being caught offside. Waghorn is way way better.

Pace is great, you also need to have the brain to use it, its no good if you keep getting caught offside the amount of times he does.

Muffin.