Adster Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 ----------------Weale------------------- Naughton------------Davies--------------Hobbs---------------Cunningham --------------------------Abe-------------------------------------- -----------------King-------------------Wellens -----------Gallagher------------Bednar---------------Vassell Subs: Logan, Vitor(if fit?), Dyer, Berner,Waghorn,Fryatt
Dylan Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Weale Naughton Davies Hobbs Cunningham Abe Wellens King Gallagher Bednar Vassell Subs: Logan, Morrison, Berner, Oakley, Dyer, Howard, Waghorn, Why change a winning team? Although I thought Bednar's touch was a bit off, this will come with a bit more match practice. Really no doubt with anything else.
Adster Posted 3 December 2010 Author Posted 3 December 2010 Weale Naughton Davies Hobbs Cunningham Abe Wellens King Gallagher Bednar Vassell Subs: Logan, Morrison, Berner, Oakley, Dyer, Howard, Waghorn, Why change a winning team? Although I thought Bednar's touch was a bit off, this will come with a bit more match practice. Really no doubt with anything else. i agree, say as in I've heard vitor is fit but i think it's wrong to leave out Hobbs when he's doing really well at the moment.
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Same team as vs Forest, though I would be tempted to play Dyer ahead of Gallagher. But as has been said already, why change a winning team?
Lisburn Fox Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Weale Cunningham Hobbs Davies Naughton Abe King Wellens Dyer Fryatt Bedner Subs: Logan, Berner, Vitor, Oakley, Vassell, Howard, Waghorn
B52 Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Weale Naughton Davies Cunningham Dyer Abe Wellens King Vassell Bednar Howard Subs: Logan, Vitor, Morrison, Berner, Oakley, Waghorn, Gallagher, Hobbs And when we lead with five goals we get Weale Naughton Davies Hobbs (or Vitor) Cunningham King Abe Wellens Waghorn Gallagher Vassell (or Fryatt)
Jakemoore Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Weale Naughton Davies Hobbs Cunningham Abe Wellens King Gallagher Bednar Vassell Subs: Logan, Morrison, Berner, Oakley, Dyer, Howard, Waghorn, Why change a winning team? Although I thought Bednar's touch was a bit off, this will come with a bit more match practice. Really no doubt with anything else. Yeah me and my dad thought that during the game, although he argued that match practice or lack off has nothing to do with his touch. He said he should have a good touch regardless. I disagreed with him.
stix Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Weale Naughton Hobbs Davies Cunningham King Abe Wellens Vassell Bednar Dyer And let Abe take some freekicks!
Callabinho Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Worried about this one, they need a win at home and its typical Leicester to go and loose this one! if we do win then it will prove we really are a strong team!
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 The same lot that started against the Trees, though I'd rather see Dyer brought on a bit quicker if Gallagher / Vassell aren't performing.
Wymsey Posted 3 December 2010 Posted 3 December 2010 Waghorn looked alright for the 5 mins he went on. I prefer him to play a game with Bednar and Bednar coming off for Howard in 2nd half
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.