dave the caveman Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 What's the foxestalk take on this very important question?
jonthefox Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I went to the university of thick as fook, so no point asking me.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 288 EDIT: was posted before options went up. When I was taught mathes (over 20 years ago now) the equation inside the brackets was to be solved first and then factored by the numbers outside, so essentially 24 (12) or 24 12s or 24 x 12. If the answer was to be 2, then the equation should look like 48÷2 (9+3)
Trav Le Bleu Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 Alternatively I suppose it could be read as 9+3 (=12) x 48 (=288) ÷2 = 144
lcfc"weasel" Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I'd answer it, in that form, as 2. 48 2(9+3) 48 24 2 However, it's impossible to say exactly without seeing it written as a fraction.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I'd answer it, in that form, as 2. 48 2(9+3) 48 24 2 However, it's impossible to say exactly without seeing it written as a fraction. Just had a word with a maths teacher and had a good long look at it and now I think you're right
Wymsey Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I initially thought and voted for 288 as i would work it out the way Trav did/learnt.
Phube Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I'd answer it, in that form, as 2. 48 2(9+3) 48 24 2 However, it's impossible to say exactly without seeing it written as a fraction. That's what I'd say...
Trav Le Bleu Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 Actually I'm swinging back to my initial answer. My teacher accomplice was wrong (fairdoes, he admitted it) To get a result of 2 the equation should look thus.. 48÷(2(9+3)) = As it stands, it's 288
potter3 Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I don't know how you could get anything other than 2.
Kenners Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 288 I reckon. Ever since year 7 i've had BIDMAS drilled into me. Brackets Indices Division Multiplication Addition Subtraction. so it would be brackets = 48 / 2x(12), then Division = 24 x12 then multiplication, giving you 288. These sort of problems need to be taken very seriously.
lcfc"weasel" Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 288 I reckon. Ever since year 7 i've had BIDMAS drilled into me. Brackets Indices Division Multiplication Addition Subtraction. so it would be brackets = 48 / 2x(12), then Division = 24 x12 then multiplication, giving you 288. These sort of problems need to be taken very seriously. You don't add the numbers to gether in the bracket you multiply them each seperately with the outside term, for example: x(x+1) would give the answer x^2 + x. Pie It's actually spelt Pi.
Alexikokopops Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I'd answer it, in that form, as 2. 48 2(9+3) 48 24 2 However, it's impossible to say exactly without seeing it written as a fraction. That's how I interpreted it it initially. It's written in such a retarded way though that you could get to either answer (either (48/2)*(9+3) or 48/(2*(9+3)) ). I'm guessing that was the OP's intention. Having read through the posts, I'd completely forgotten BIDMAS and I work with statistics and numbers every day
Kenners Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 You don't add the numbers to gether in the bracket you multiply them each seperately with the outside term, for example: x(x+1) would give the answer x^2 + x. It's actually spelt Pi. It's the same either way, 2x9 + 2x3 =24 ; 2x(12)=24. But because the 2 is used in the division of 48 (by the laws of bidmas) then you dont actually times the bracket by 2 but by 24.
BoneDog Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 It's actually spelt Pi. Wrong thread, I thought I was in 'what are you eating now?'. The answer to this question is infinity.
Alexikokopops Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 It's the same either way, 2x9 + 2x3 =24. But because the 2 is used in the division of 48 (by the laws of bidmas) then you dont actually times the bracket by 2 but by 24. I'd argue that the implication by the way it was written (the fact that it's 2(9+3) rather than 2*(9+3) ) is that they're grouped together as part of the sum, so you can shove BIDMAS It's written in such a ridiculous way, mind
Kenners Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I'd argue that the implication by the way it was written (the fact that it's 2(9+3) rather than 2*(9+3) ) is that they're grouped together as part of the sum, so you can shove BIDMAS It's written in such a ridiculous way, mind Bidmas has been my maths life for 6 years, Dont take it away from me
James18 Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 If you were in an exam and that question came up the way it's written there, the correct answer would be 288. BIDMAS/BODMAS
Asha Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 I've always thought the brackets are sorted out first, so it'd be 2
lcfc"weasel" Posted 10 April 2011 Posted 10 April 2011 Even if you sum the numbers inside the brackets, you can't just remove the brackets, it'd still have to read 48/2(12). You still have brackets so can't divide yet and therefore have to make it 48/24 and give you an answer of 2. However, as I said before unless you have it in fractional form you can't give and exact answer and you should give them both if you were to get the question in an exam also stating your reasoning as you shouldn't be able to get two answers to anything unless it's a quadratic.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.