Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
LCFC_FAN_1995

Nottingham Forest

Recommended Posts

Posted

The bench will probably be

Weale

Dyer

Waghorn

King/Danns

Gally/Vassell

Waghorn didn't make the bench at Cov, and probably won't at Forest either.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Schmeical

Pantsil

Mills

Bamba

Konchesky

Wellens

Fernandez

Danns

King

Nugent

Vassell

4-4-2 diamond

That would be my team too... maybe Schlupp for Vassell

Posted

That would be my team too... maybe Schlupp for Vassell

Not for me, schlump seems as lazy as the yak. Didn't seem to move if the ball didn't come to his feet

Posted

Schmeical

Pantsil

Mills

Bamba

Konchesky

Wellens

Fernandez

Danns

King

Nugent

Vassell

4-4-2 diamond

Yes! That's exactly the team I picked! Look at page 8.

I don't understand why we aren't using this - we have lots of central midfielders and no good natural wingers so this would be ideal. Plus, no-one is out of position and we'd have a proper striking partnership. Nugent wouldn't be so isolated, he wouldn't have to work so hard and I'm sure him and Vassell would create plenty of chances for each other.

Who would you pick for the bench? Someone laughed at my subs, but I can't work out why.

Posted

Not for me, schlump seems as lazy as the yak. Didn't seem to move if the ball didn't come to his feet

We should put the ball at his feet then, he was just getting into the game against reading when our glorious leader took him off.

Posted

xxxxxxxxxxxxxKasperxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

PeltierxxxxxMillsxxxBambaxxxxxKonchesky

xxxxxxxDanns King Wellens

VassellxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDyer

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxNugentxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Posted

Who would you pick for the bench? Someone laughed at my subs, but I can't work out why.

weale

Ssl

Abe

Gallagher

Schlupp

Wouldn't choose waghorn, piss poor atm

What a surprise, the same as you

Posted

weale

Ssl

Abe

Gallagher

Schlupp

Wouldn't choose waghorn, piss poor atm

What a surprise, the same as you

Wouldn't let Weale anywhere near Nottingham again.

Abe is very versatile, LB,RB,CDM,CM, and maybe CB in emergencies. So could make room available

Posted

Wouldn't let Weale anywhere near Nottingham again.

Abe is very versatile, LB,RB,CDM,CM, and maybe CB in emergencies. So could make room available

Tbf if it was my choice I wouldn't have a goalkeeper on a 5 man bench, I would place peltier or Howard as the 5th player, but i know sven won't do that

Posted

Tbf if it was my choice I wouldn't have a goalkeeper on a 5 man bench, I would place peltier or Howard as the 5th player, but i know sven won't do that

agree with no keeper - if I could be arsed I'd go back and calculate how many times Kasper has been subbed or sent off in 2 years - assume each time = points lost which wouldn't necessarily be the case- bet it still wouldn't be many. This 7 down the 5 subs lark has really cost us some of our squad size/quality advantage this year

Posted

4-4-2 Diamond for me.

Kasper

Peltier

Mills

Bamba

Konchesky

Wellens

Gallagher

Fernandes

King

Nugent

Vassell

Subs

Weale

St Ledger

Danns

Abe

Waghorn

Posted

We should put the ball at his feet then, he was just getting into the game against reading when our glorious leader took him off.

I agree. I thought Schlupp played well against Reading. When he was taken off we lost a bit of pace and attacking creativity. I wasn't impressed with Nugent. Glad he scored last game though.

Posted

agree with no keeper - if I could be arsed I'd go back and calculate how many times Kasper has been subbed or sent off in 2 years - assume each time = points lost which wouldn't necessarily be the case- bet it still wouldn't be many. This 7 down the 5 subs lark has really cost us some of our squad size/quality advantage this year

Sod's law - the first game we play with no keeper on the bench, Schmeichel gets injured or sent off. We can only use 3 of the 5 subs anyway, so I don't think it's a risk worth taking.

You're right about the new 5 subs rule instead of 7 - fvcking stupid. I bet there's not a single manager, player or fan in the football league in favour of it. Having 7 subs means young players get a chance to show what they can do if the team is winning comfortably, and you can cover more positions. Honestly, I can't think of one good reason to go back to just 5 subs.

Posted

------------------ Kasper ----------------

Pantsil - Mills - Bamba - Konchesky

------------------ Wellens --------------

Danns ------------------------ Fernandes

------------------ King ----------------

---------- Nugent - Vassell -------

Posted

Looks like I wasn't far off :)

------------------ Kasper ----------------

Pantsil - Mills - Bamba - Konchesky

------------------ Wellens --------------

Danns ------------------------ Dyer

------------------ King ----------------

---------- Nugent - Schlupp -------

Subs

Vassell

Fernandes

Howard

Waghorn

SSL

Posted

------------------ Kasper ----------------

Pantsil - Mills - Bamba - Konchesky

------------------ Wellens --------------

Danns ------------------------ Dyer

------------------ King ----------------

---------- Nugent - Schlupp -------

Subs

Vassell

Fernandes

Howard

Waghorn

SSL

Bad timing

Gonna confuse a few people

Posted

Still think the team has no balance unless it is a diamond which I doubt come on you blues

Stringer is saying its a midfield diamond, but i don't see it either... Danns right, Vassell middle, nugent left = isolated up front

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...