Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 I dont say this as a proposal... just a topic thats indefensible... but you have to try to make a supportive argument for it. You can also choose any other "defend the indefensible" topic, if you like, but please add a reasoned argument in support of your statement. See below for example Statement: We should stop giving money to African aid charities such as Oxfam because it only serves to prevent deaths. Reason: The result of this is that famine and water shortages will get worse because there will be an increase in the population if we continue to provide relief and cure disease...
NeilyBoy Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 Nigel Pearson should be sacked as manager of Leicester City because he didn't bring a magic wand with him to wave us into the Prem.
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 Nigel Pearson should be sacked as manager of Leicester City because he didn't bring a magic wand with him to wave us into the Prem. I quite agree, what were we thinking appointing a non-wizard in the first place. He must be the worst un-mystical manager in all the leagues. If he doesnt posses the ethereal super-powers of a non-human mythical being we shouldn't be wasting our money on him. He is too human for us. We should have stuck with the Swedish troll.
Zingari Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 old age pensioners should have the winter fuel allowance and free bus passes taken off them most of them drive big cars and live in Spain in the winter 97% of them ( so i'm reliably told by my mate in the pub) don't need this extra dosh and they should give it to young single parents !! edit; these benefits should be reinstated in a few years time when i reach oap status though
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 old age pensioners should have the winter fuel allowance and free bus passes taken off them most of them drive big cars and live in Spain in the winter 97% of them ( so i'm reliably told by my mate in the pub) don't need this extra dosh and they should give it to young single parents !! edit; these benefits should be reinstated in a few years time when i reach oap status though Quite right too. What is it about old people that they need money to live on. If they fought in the war then they should have plenty of survival skills to enable them to live off berries and insects whilst drinking their own (infected) piss. And as for using buses, where the hell is it that they need to go?. They must already own everything they'll ever need for the rest of their lives.
The Doctor Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 We should stop giving money to African aid charities such as Oxfam because it only serves to prevent deaths. The result of this is that famine and water shortages will get worse because there will be an increase in the population if we continue to provide relief and cure disease... erm, if we reduce the size of the worlds population dramatically, then we are likely to reduce the amount of evil ****s in the world. All children should be forced to drink small amounts of alcohol from age 5, then at 15, given 5 pints then antagonised. Anyone who responds violently or acts like a twat is to be banned from drinking for the remainder of their life.
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 erm, if we reduce the size of the worlds population dramatically, then we are likely to reduce the amount of evil ****s in the world. Yes absolutely because MY mate in the pub says all the evil ***ers are from poorer coutries like Somalia and Wales . Let's keep the natural culling process and save ourselves some money in the process. Disease and famine ROCKS... All children should be forced to drink small amounts of alcohol from age 5, then at 15, given 5 pints then antagonised. Anyone who responds violently or acts like a twat is to be banned from drinking for the remainder of their life.
The Doctor Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 Execute the Welsh? Don't see any problems with that myself.
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 All children should be forced to drink small amounts of alcohol from age 5, then at 15, given 5 pints then antagonised. Anyone who responds violently or acts like a twat is to be banned from drinking for the remainder of their life. Sorry this doesn't qualify. It's a perfectly reasonable argument
The Doctor Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 Sorry this doesn't qualify. It's a perfectly reasonable argument ok then, Kill all the homeless to lower world suffering.
sphericalfox Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 Wow, I can see this thread's humour breaking a few faux pas. Are we talking defend the indefensible, like Michael Jackson, was a misunderstood man child, not a ego maniac pedo type thing, or far more extreme than that?
Zingari Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 Quite right too. What is it about old people that they need money to live on. If they fought in the war then they should have plenty of survival skills to enable them to live off berries and insects whilst drinking their own (infected) piss. And as for using buses, where the hell is it that they need to go?. They must already own everything they'll ever need for the rest of their lives. My old grandmother was very resourceful, she didn't need free buses When she wanted to go shopping at Morrison’s , she used to pretend to fall over and break her leg , call an ambulance to take her to the Royal , and after a few minutes , hop off the gurney and tell them it’s ok and she’ll just try walking around . She’d then pop over the road and do her shopping and go the bingo and get back in time for the free taxi ambulances taking the genuine patients home old people today ? pffft
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 ok then, Kill all the homeless to lower world suffering. Yep, Because that means those of us who live in houses (glass or otherwise) AND have a pot to piss in, would feel more comfortable moving around freely without these scrounging smelly no-hopers getting under our feet. We would save money on not printing the Big Issue or not giving money to charity and therefore would suffer less as WE would have more. Now you're getting the hang of this, Al
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 Wow, I can see this thread's humour breaking a few faux pas. Are we talking defend the indefensible, like Michael Jackson, was a misunderstood man child, not a ego maniac pedo type thing, or far more extreme than that? Yes exactly that sort of thing. Of course he was misunderstood. He didn't know he was black until he got his first mirror and that traumatised him to such an extent that he became developomentally delayed at age 7, believing he WAS Peter Pan. Just as well he'd never heard of Oberon, King of the Fairies. He couldn't recognise the supposition of many that he had Peadohiliac tendencies as he considered himself to be a child and therefore it was ok to "explore" with other children. A poor sad person who liked having children in his bed... Defended!
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 My old grandmother was very resourceful, she didn't need free buses When she wanted to go shopping at Morrison’s , she used to pretend to fall over and break her leg , call an ambulance to take her to the Royal , and after a few minutes , hop off the gurney and tell them it’s ok and she’ll just try walking around . She’d then pop over the road and do her shopping and go the bingo and get back in time for the free taxi ambulances taking the genuine patients home old people today ? pffft Damn I know that woman...
NeilyBoy Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 The richer you are, the less tax you should pay as a reward for working so hard and sweating your way to all that money. People on benefits should pay higher levels of tax to make up for the strain they're putting on the economy.
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 The richer you are, the less tax you should pay as a reward for working so hard and sweating your way to all that money. People on benefits should pay higher levels of tax to make up for the strain they're putting on the economy. OK those are your points... now defend them.. anyone?
The Doctor Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 The richer you are, the less tax you should pay as a reward for working so hard and sweating your way to all that money. People on benefits should pay higher levels of tax to make up for the strain they're putting on the economy. They'd result in certain incredibly left-wing welshmen exploding into a million pieces due to rage. That's about all I can find that is pro your arguments. The world would be a lot better if we handed control back to Maggie Thatcher.
Webbo Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 OK those are your points... now defend them.. anyone? I would do but I don't want to derail your thread.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 I was thinking of starting a thread like this. I guess Parafox also listens to Fighting Talk on Radio 5 too. Premiership footballers should get the money that has been cut from pensions because the cost of rotisserie chicken has risen dramatically now that there is VAT on heated food.
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 I would do but I don't want to derail your thread. Thanks
Parafox Posted 22 March 2012 Author Posted 22 March 2012 I was thinking of starting a thread like this. I guess Parafox also listens to Fighting Talk on Radio 5 too. Premiership footballers should get the money that has been cut from pensions because the cost of rotisserie chicken has risen dramatically now that there is VAT on heated food. Yep, I do Quite reasonable that the money robbed from the pensioners should go to the football playing elite. After all, pensioners have their food heated elswhere before being delivered cold to their door. How convenient that they dont have to use their free bus passes to get to Nando's in the first place when they could just stick the food in a bowl of hot water to get it up to tempertaure. Footballers have to pay the ever increasing cost of fuel for their trips to town and the suburbs of Manchester (and let's face it, BMW X5's and Range Rover sports aren't cheap to run. Think of the cost of blacking out the windows). It would be unfair to expect them to find the extra VAT for a hot meal as well.
Daggers Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 Margaret Thatcher is the best PM this country has eve...no, I'm sorry, I just can't do it.
steveherbe Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 At last, a thread of like-minded people! I've been searching for this ever since I joined FT. The rest of it is full of weak-minded nancy boys that get upset if you argue with them. A page and a half of thread so far, and not one arguement, just good commonsense ideas. Anybody up for clearing the Isle of Man and putting all the convicts there? We could let them forage for their own food. Although as wife works for the Prison Service, she would be out of a job. Oh well, she could join the unemployed and sweep the streets, clean graffiti off walls and mend potholes. Hitler wasnt bad y'know, just a bit misunderstood.
21st Century Fox Posted 22 March 2012 Posted 22 March 2012 The Tories give us all something to aspire to, its good to get rich because we can safeguard our grandchildren never having to hold down a proper job but still walk into positions of power. Nepotism is a good thing.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.