Ben Marshall

[kingfox]

KFC Gravy with Boneless Banquet meal     :w00t:

 

Boys I want one now

 

Had one of them last week, but they gave me Barbecue sauce instead, which tasted like tar.

 

And believe me I know what tar tastes like, but that's another story 

[The God Emperor]

Any of you ever had a Toby Carvery Sandwich?

yorkshire puds for bread and the works for the filling?

[Jace]

Is there a Wimpy in Leicester? All the 1s down here were closed down years ago 

[KFS]

Southampton away?

 

http://www.tobycarvery.co.uk/sandwichexpresssouthampton/

[Meltonfossefox]

Go get yourself a KFC mate....night everyone putting baby to bed and hitting the sack....up the city

[theessexfox]

WE NEED THE SAINTS IN THE CUP

[The God Emperor]

City takeover at the toby carvery!

[LCFC FOX]

Go get yourself a KFC mate....night everyone putting baby to bed and hitting the sack....up the city

Nearest is Fosse Park which is shut! 

[LCFC FOX]

Had one of them last week, but they gave me Barbecue sauce instead, which tasted like tar.

 

And believe me I know what tar tastes like, but that's another story 

Should of went and slapped them! had one before the game against Leeds, but added 2 hot chicken wings for 69p

[kingfox]

Should of went and slapped them! had one before the game against Leeds, but added 2 hot chicken wings for 69p

 

They are all foreign in there.

 

Would of been a racist attack if I hit them. 

 

And there's no point me going to jail just to get bummed, when it's on offer across the road.

[Manc-Fox]

Go back 10 - 12 months. Marshall is handed the number 7 shirt as he is told that he is a first teamer for the new season. He is being talked about on sky sports as an exciting attacking player. The fans love him because of his goals and his creative play. He is called up by England and makes his debut for the under 21 team.

He returns to his club and is told to track back to provide defensive cover. His creative play suffers as a result. Knockaert scores two against Huddersfield and starts a few games and Ben is dropped as Knockaert is the next best thing (at this point Knockaert is given the freedom to attack).

Marshall and Knocky play together and the team do well (7 or 8 wins on the bounce - top 4). Then NP starts to sub one or both on 60 mins, regardless of how they are playing, or one of them starts whilst the other is on the subs bench.

When results change for the worse, NP ignores players in training or gets his staff to speak to his players or tells them that they're playing on Saturday but then without any explanation he changes his mind.

Then over the next few months NP (or his staff, or via a list on a board in the training ground) tells players that they must travel to games but then they don't make the starting line up or subs bench - this means they haven't trained that day, which is probably the second day in a row they haven't trained because they don't always train the day before a game - this causes frustration as players need (and want) to train, especially the older players.

When asked by the players if he/they can improve communication, NP ignores them or says that he will, but then ignores them anyway.

Basically players have played week in week out since they were young and suddenly they're at a club where the manager has bought them because of the way they've played at their previous club. The manager (or his staff) then change (or try to change) the way they play and coach out of them the things that made them sign them in the first place. Why buy a players for his qualities then change his playing style. If you want a defensive winger, then buy a wingback.

As a result, Performances suffer and players are dropped. The players then ask for explanations but are ignored or accused of having a bad attitude. The players have done what they are told and so can't understand what they've done wrong' especially when the manager doesn't explain the reasons to them.

Some will say that players are paid well etc etc, but how much a person is paid doesn't mean that they can cope with every situation (it just means that they are depressed in a nicer car or nicer house than you or I) and it doesn't make them immune to criticism from the terraces.

Man management is about communication or simple explanations or giving encouragement or offering guidance.

Good luck to Marshall if he goes and to others if they move on.

[theessexfox]

Who's Marshall? Can you put him in a sandwich? 

[The God Emperor]

Go back 10 - 12 months. Marshall is handed the number 7 shirt as he is told that he is a first teamer for the new season. He is being talked about on sky sports as an exciting attacking player. The fans love him because of his goals and his creative play. He is called up by England and makes his debut for the under 21 team.

He returns to his club and is told to track back to provide defensive cover. His creative play suffers as a result. Knockaert scores two against Huddersfield and starts a few games and Ben is dropped as Knockaert is the next best thing (at this point Knockaert is given the freedom to attack).

Marshall and Knocky play together and the team do well (7 or 8 wins on the bounce - top 4). Then NP starts to sub one or both on 60 mins, regardless of how they are playing, or one of them starts whilst the other is on the subs bench.

When results change for the worse, NP ignores players in training or gets his staff to speak to his players or tells them that they're playing on Saturday but then without any explanation he changes his mind.

Then over the next few months NP (or his staff, or via a list on a board in the training ground) tells players that they must travel to games but then they don't make the starting line up or subs bench - this means they haven't trained that day, which is probably the second day in a row they haven't trained because they don't always train the day before a game - this causes frustration as players need (and want) to train, especially the older players.

When asked by the players if he/they can improve communication, NP ignores them or says that he will, but then ignores them anyway.

Basically players have played week in week out since they were young and suddenly they're at a club where the manager has bought them because of the way they've played at their previous club. The manager (or his staff) then change (or try to change) the way they play and coach out of them the things that made them sign them in the first place. Why buy a players for his qualities then change his playing style. If you want a defensive winger, then buy a wingback.

As a result, Performances suffer and players are dropped. The players then ask for explanations but are ignored or accused of having a bad attitude. The players have done what they are told and so can't understand what they've done wrong' especially when the manager doesn't explain the reasons to them.

Some will say that players are paid well etc etc, but how much a person is paid doesn't mean that they can cope with every situation (it just means that they are depressed in a nicer car or nicer house than you or I) and it doesn't make them immune to criticism from the terraces.

Man management is about communication or simple explanations or giving encouragement or offering guidance.

Good luck to Marshall if he goes and to others if they move on.

what do like on your bacon cobs?

[sphericalfox]

Go back 10 - 12 months. Marshall is handed the number 7 shirt as he is told that he is a first teamer for the new season. He is being talked about on sky sports as an exciting attacking player. The fans love him because of his goals and his creative play. He is called up by England and makes his debut for the under 21 team.

He returns to his club and is told to track back to provide defensive cover. His creative play suffers as a result. Knockaert scores two against Huddersfield and starts a few games and Ben is dropped as Knockaert is the next best thing (at this point Knockaert is given the freedom to attack).

Marshall and Knocky play together and the team do well (7 or 8 wins on the bounce - top 4). Then NP starts to sub one or both on 60 mins, regardless of how they are playing, or one of them starts whilst the other is on the subs bench.

When results change for the worse, NP ignores players in training or gets his staff to speak to his players or tells them that they're playing on Saturday but then without any explanation he changes his mind.

Then over the next few months NP (or his staff, or via a list on a board in the training ground) tells players that they must travel to games but then they don't make the starting line up or subs bench - this means they haven't trained that day, which is probably the second day in a row they haven't trained because they don't always train the day before a game - this causes frustration as players need (and want) to train, especially the older players.

When asked by the players if he/they can improve communication, NP ignores them or says that he will, but then ignores them anyway.

Basically players have played week in week out since they were young and suddenly they're at a club where the manager has bought them because of the way they've played at their previous club. The manager (or his staff) then change (or try to change) the way they play and coach out of them the things that made them sign them in the first place. Why buy a players for his qualities then change his playing style. If you want a defensive winger, then buy a wingback.

As a result, Performances suffer and players are dropped. The players then ask for explanations but are ignored or accused of having a bad attitude. The players have done what they are told and so can't understand what they've done wrong' especially when the manager doesn't explain the reasons to them.

Some will say that players are paid well etc etc, but how much a person is paid doesn't mean that they can cope with every situation (it just means that they are depressed in a nicer car or nicer house than you or I) and it doesn't make them immune to criticism from the terraces.

Man management is about communication or simple explanations or giving encouragement or offering guidance.

Good luck to Marshall if he goes and to others if they move on.

 

 

Cheers for the explanation Ben. All the best! 

[Manc-Fox]

Brown sauce on a bacon barm.

what do like on your bacon cobs?

[john doe]

Go back 10 - 12 months. Marshall is handed the number 7 shirt as he is told that he is a first teamer for the new season. He is being talked about on sky sports as an exciting attacking player. The fans love him because of his goals and his creative play. He is called up by England and makes his debut for the under 21 team.

He returns to his club and is told to track back to provide defensive cover. His creative play suffers as a result. Knockaert scores two against Huddersfield and starts a few games and Ben is dropped as Knockaert is the next best thing (at this point Knockaert is given the freedom to attack).

Marshall and Knocky play together and the team do well (7 or 8 wins on the bounce - top 4). Then NP starts to sub one or both on 60 mins, regardless of how they are playing, or one of them starts whilst the other is on the subs bench.

When results change for the worse, NP ignores players in training or gets his staff to speak to his players or tells them that they're playing on Saturday but then without any explanation he changes his mind.

Then over the next few months NP (or his staff, or via a list on a board in the training ground) tells players that they must travel to games but then they don't make the starting line up or subs bench - this means they haven't trained that day, which is probably the second day in a row they haven't trained because they don't always train the day before a game - this causes frustration as players need (and want) to train, especially the older players.

When asked by the players if he/they can improve communication, NP ignores them or says that he will, but then ignores them anyway.

Basically players have played week in week out since they were young and suddenly they're at a club where the manager has bought them because of the way they've played at their previous club. The manager (or his staff) then change (or try to change) the way they play and coach out of them the things that made them sign them in the first place. Why buy a players for his qualities then change his playing style. If you want a defensive winger, then buy a wingback.

As a result, Performances suffer and players are dropped. The players then ask for explanations but are ignored or accused of having a bad attitude. The players have done what they are told and so can't understand what they've done wrong' especially when the manager doesn't explain the reasons to them.

Some will say that players are paid well etc etc, but how much a person is paid doesn't mean that they can cope with every situation (it just means that they are depressed in a nicer car or nicer house than you or I) and it doesn't make them immune to criticism from the terraces.

Man management is about communication or simple explanations or giving encouragement or offering guidance.

Good luck to Marshall if he goes and to others if they move on.

this has to be wellans 

[Danno]

Cheers for the explanation Ben. All the best!

Spellings too good for Marshall

[sphericalfox]

this has to be wellans 

 

fair point, Marshy likes red sauce! 

[The God Emperor]

fair point, Marshy likes red sauce! 

forest scum! nige found out that's why he's off

[sphericalfox]

Come on then Richie, spill the beans! 

 

At least give us the low down on Sven!!! 

[AnotherShitSeason]

Go back 10 - 12 months. Marshall is handed the number 7 shirt as he is told that he is a first teamer for the new season. He is being talked about on sky sports as an exciting attacking player. The fans love him because of his goals and his creative play. He is called up by England and makes his debut for the under 21 team.

He returns to his club and is told to track back to provide defensive cover. His creative play suffers as a result. Knockaert scores two against Huddersfield and starts a few games and Ben is dropped as Knockaert is the next best thing (at this point Knockaert is given the freedom to attack).

Marshall and Knocky play together and the team do well (7 or 8 wins on the bounce - top 4). Then NP starts to sub one or both on 60 mins, regardless of how they are playing, or one of them starts whilst the other is on the subs bench.

When results change for the worse, NP ignores players in training or gets his staff to speak to his players or tells them that they're playing on Saturday but then without any explanation he changes his mind.

Then over the next few months NP (or his staff, or via a list on a board in the training ground) tells players that they must travel to games but then they don't make the starting line up or subs bench - this means they haven't trained that day, which is probably the second day in a row they haven't trained because they don't always train the day before a game - this causes frustration as players need (and want) to train, especially the older players.

When asked by the players if he/they can improve communication, NP ignores them or says that he will, but then ignores them anyway.

Basically players have played week in week out since they were young and suddenly they're at a club where the manager has bought them because of the way they've played at their previous club. The manager (or his staff) then change (or try to change) the way they play and coach out of them the things that made them sign them in the first place. Why buy a players for his qualities then change his playing style. If you want a defensive winger, then buy a wingback.

As a result, Performances suffer and players are dropped. The players then ask for explanations but are ignored or accused of having a bad attitude. The players have done what they are told and so can't understand what they've done wrong' especially when the manager doesn't explain the reasons to them.

Some will say that players are paid well etc etc, but how much a person is paid doesn't mean that they can cope with every situation (it just means that they are depressed in a nicer car or nicer house than you or I) and it doesn't make them immune to criticism from the terraces.

Man management is about communication or simple explanations or giving encouragement or offering guidance.

Good luck to Marshall if he goes and to others if they move on.

 

Interesting post. Very interesting. 

[scotty1980]

Spot on manc fox! Couldnt of put it better myself great post

[cjslcfc]

Go back 10 - 12 months. Marshall is handed the number 7 shirt as he is told that he is a first teamer for the new season. He is being talked about on sky sports as an exciting attacking player. The fans love him because of his goals and his creative play. He is called up by England and makes his debut for the under 21 team.

He returns to his club and is told to track back to provide defensive cover. His creative play suffers as a result. Knockaert scores two against Huddersfield and starts a few games and Ben is dropped as Knockaert is the next best thing (at this point Knockaert is given the freedom to attack).

Marshall and Knocky play together and the team do well (7 or 8 wins on the bounce - top 4). Then NP starts to sub one or both on 60 mins, regardless of how they are playing, or one of them starts whilst the other is on the subs bench.

When results change for the worse, NP ignores players in training or gets his staff to speak to his players or tells them that they're playing on Saturday but then without any explanation he changes his mind.

Then over the next few months NP (or his staff, or via a list on a board in the training ground) tells players that they must travel to games but then they don't make the starting line up or subs bench - this means they haven't trained that day, which is probably the second day in a row they haven't trained because they don't always train the day before a game - this causes frustration as players need (and want) to train, especially the older players.

When asked by the players if he/they can improve communication, NP ignores them or says that he will, but then ignores them anyway.

Basically players have played week in week out since they were young and suddenly they're at a club where the manager has bought them because of the way they've played at their previous club. The manager (or his staff) then change (or try to change) the way they play and coach out of them the things that made them sign them in the first place. Why buy a players for his qualities then change his playing style. If you want a defensive winger, then buy a wingback.

As a result, Performances suffer and players are dropped. The players then ask for explanations but are ignored or accused of having a bad attitude. The players have done what they are told and so can't understand what they've done wrong' especially when the manager doesn't explain the reasons to them.

Some will say that players are paid well etc etc, but how much a person is paid doesn't mean that they can cope with every situation (it just means that they are depressed in a nicer car or nicer house than you or I) and it doesn't make them immune to criticism from the terraces.

Man management is about communication or simple explanations or giving encouragement or offering guidance.

Good luck to Marshall if he goes and to others if they move on.

 

Spot on manc fox! Couldnt of put it better myself great post

 

Will the real Ben Marshall please speak up...

[Manc-Fox]

Neither. I've recently moved to the North West and have done some work for a sports media/travel company and dealt with clubs and agents and was just interested to find out what happens at clubs and how things change over a course of a season. Thought i would share to give a different slant on why players move on.

[scotty1980]

Says it all really in that last post, please only comment if you have something intelligent to write,