Danizen

Imagine if after waiting 25 years to voice their innate superiority complex, they have to get back in their box after less than a season! Glorious.

But as someone with a micro penis once said, 'you do what you can with what you have.' There's been zero organisation or coaching of this lot since he came in.

Oh, I'm not criticising the tifos. Just the arrogance and gate-keeping that comes with it from their fans. They gave UFS shit for years for copying Palace fans, like they invented the concept of tifos and chanting.

This is a bit of a blast from the past. Palace fans apparently still think they invented ultra culture.

I know a way we can use him to finally get rid of Rudkin. It's not pretty and I don't envy him but it will be worth it....

We're nailed on for 20th

Mendy could probably wear that.

I'm not voting in these until Alex Smithies gets justice.

Score an own goal and then go shush his favourite corner of The Hawthorns.

Not many players can suffer two relegation, be good mates with Dennis Wise and still have legendary status at this club. Fully deserved, BTW. He does need to go, though.

But the redshite hive mind on Facebook can guarantee that Cooper would have kept us up so....

PSR definitely needs to be reworked. It's ridiculous that under the current regulations, it's better to sell an academy product for £15m than it is to sell off a duffer in his 30s for £20m because of book value and amortisation. Surely, going forward, any promoted side will be able to include their expected TV income, or they really will have to spend nothing.

Why the fvck is there not a relegation clause? There was hardly a queue of clubs in for RVN.

The PFA would have an absolute meltdown but clubs do need to break player power. Over the course of about 15 years the TV deal got more and more lucrative. The problem is, the club's didn't get to keep that money. Player's wage rises outstripping the TV money so it ended up being a net loss for almost every PL club. The simple retort to that is, 'the club's didn't have to offer those wages' but the truth is, they did if they wanted to sign anyone. If one club doesn't pay it, there's another five that will (and then some). Break clauses should be the norm and also, loyalty bonuses need to be reshaped so a player can't moan about joining another club, sulk, threaten to go on strike, be tapped up by 'third parties' and then still bank millions from their loyalty bonus because they didn't formally request a transfer.

Surely, this just closes the loophole going forward. You can't just change the rules then apply them retrospectively. We were the last to get away with it similar to how we avoided a points deduction when we went into administration.

ASAP. Like Hao doing his Data Analytics degree in Dallas constitutes a national emergency...

Not hard since the conclusion was, 'it's the stadium announcer's fault.'

It works both ways, though. "An Algerian winger from Ligue 2? No, thanks. He'll be shit and we've already got Knockaert."

I'd argue playing him would result in a lower fee.

Before his injury, he was on a one-man crusade to stop the ball going in. Since his return, he's probably looked at our league position and the 'defenders' around him and thought, 'fvck it'. I think he'll do well again, next season.

After all this time wondering if Southampton will beat Derby's record low points total, it ends up being us

I don't think any big club comes in for him. His form has been iffy since he came back from his injury. He's probably stopped trying as much since all our defenders just wave the opposition through. He needs a year with a competent defence in front of him to rebuild his confidence and get him back in form. I'm thinking he might stay.

https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/two-leicester-city-changes-possible-10097812?utm_source=livescore&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=foryou Faes possibly out for the Brighton game. This could turn our season around.