Chrysalis

Moyes indeed would be a very solid choice.

We easily fill 40k in the EPL, and I think we would fill 45k.

Yep looks like they could see the tide was turning and acted quickly.

Gutted, Whelan retiring.

Ironically nothing to do with the goal, but rather he is similar style to KDH.

If we lose KDH and Southampton dont go up, Smallbone looks to have potential.

Who says the offer is for that amount?

No worries we bring back Johnathon Morgan, oh wait...

If they had sense for FFP yes, but Top and Whelan how they have managed our finances? Probably no. Ironic you get a Stadium expansion/rebuild done quicker than us when we had 8 years or so to do it.

If he wont sign for less than 100k, I dont see us giving him a contract.

We dont have the means to replace his quality for less than a new contract. Fairy tale land stuff we can find a good on the ball defender suited to Enzo style with EPL experience for a couple of million and 10k a week wages.

Needs a yes at lower salary option.

What if the problem is top?

Shortest non TV poll in history? its already closed.

They are the most profitable signings when short of money, as a poor injury record lowers the fee, Huth and Winks both examples. Beggars cant be choosers.

We asked for too much again. We just wont learn.

Seems Iverson we have failed to sell again, we keep asking for too much.

Well to be fair with Soyuncu he seemed to be dropped for a falling out with the manager. When he was brought back in the team his attitude was pretty good. You cant blame him for not renewing when we had no interest in playing him. We even turned down an offer for him at the start of our relegation season.

My view is usually if its a 1st team player, especially key player, you keep the player, the offer would have to be completely mental to make it worth it, as an example I dont think its worth accepting the rumoured 20-40million for KDH. Bit part players on big wages, I think its worth cutting losses though, bite your tongue on the not meeting valuation.

Hope you took a screenshot as link is now dead.

Good luck with this, it has become clear the current foxes trust leadership has become too cosy with the club.

This is actually much better than doing a 39th game. Still not great, but nowhere near as stupid as the 39th game. As it ensures you still only play each team twice.

So what happens when 17th club has 1 point lead, they are drawn man city, and 18th place club is drawn a weak team with nothing to play for, then they swap position. The relegated team had to play man city 3 times.

So let me understand this, for years they have been whingeing we playing too many games. Now they want to add an extra league game played over the Atlantic. This breaks a fair amount of sporting integrity as well, as we have right now a play each team once home and away in place. If this gets voted in, it will be greed over common sense.

Its all to do with fair and consistent enforcement of rules. The whole thing loses credibility when its only selectively applied. Its clear the entire thing is in the process of falling apart, the only question is how long it will take and what changes will happen. You are right I have no legal knowledge, and as such some of what I said could be considered complete nonsense but I think I have a point on the EPL not being keen on doing something against man city as they are trying to keep up an appearance of a competition in a healthy state.