MGLCFC

Yes shocking - but he was available for selection according to King.

Yes, I do, but neither you or I know the details behind the problem. On the surface Winks' behaviour is totally unacceptable. This alleged behaviour happened whilst King was part of the management team. So for King to bring him back, maybe he feels the issue was more the previous managers rather than Winks. Saying Winks is a cancer is just an opinion, and for the record I tend to agree with you, but how many players have come out and said so. All I'm saying, is based on what I saw today, he improved the performance when he came on. Yes we conceded 2 goals (neither his fault) but we looked more threatening and had Ayew converted the penalty, I think we may have got something from the game.

Just because someone has a different opinion to you they are happy clappers. This comment is typical of some on here. I'm not a HAPPY CLAPPER as you suggest. I think the club has been run into the ground by Top and Rudkin. I don't clap at the end of games. I've been vocal both home and away at how poorly our club has been run, but because I suggest Winks is one of our better midfielders and I will support the new managers decision to play him, it makes me a happy clapper. Absolutely pathetic.

But he's much better than what we have available at present, isn't he?

Look in the mirror, clown

Poor argument - look at our XG once he was introduced - much more likely to score. He can hardly be blamed for the 2 goals conceded.

You're missing the point. If the current manager feels he warrants a place in the match day squad, then I'm prepared to back his decision, as he, rather than you or me, have a greater insight into the internal issues surrounding the problem. Winks was good today, I can understand people feel he's let himself, the club and supporters down, but the crisis we are in, in particular in midfield, he is a better option than the others.

Your entitled to your opinion, but if the manager wishes him to be part of the match day squad, then I'll support King's decision. You must be blind if you can't see we were significantly better when Winks on the field today. We actually looked like we might score.

But could help still be in this division - he's better than what's available at present.

So you know the exact reason behind the issues. If Kingy thinks he should be selected, surely we should get behind the interim manager?

Even though we were better once he was introduced. With him playing we have a chance of survival. I take it you want us in this league.

Everyone can have their opinions on what is right or wrong in regards Winks' situation, but for me we looked better today once he was introduced. Apart from James, he is our best midfielder IMO.

Yet we were far better in an attacking sense when he was on the pitch.

Did well, but not a centre back (lost too many aerial duals). Hope he gets a run of games at right back. Like how he gained confidence after his first run forward which drew a foul and a booking for Dykes.

Disappointed he took a midfielder off instead of Mavadidi who did jack all game.

Perhaps you're correct regarding his selection - but if if he were I'd take it you'd not be supportive of King's decision. Would you voice your anger by booing him? I'm not being judgemental as everyone has differing opinions, I'm just curious.

I love your optimism that Rudkin can get 3 loans and two permanents completed in 36 hours, as well as completing this deal and any other outgoings.

How are Derby in or around the play offs. They've got to be one of the worst teams we've played this year and we're sh1t too.

I'd like to think those going could be fully supportive of King and so if he selects Winks, there's not too much adverse reaction. But I guess others may have a different opinion.

Unless it's Leicester

It obviously is, as it's meant to be surnames of former players that are professions, not alternative professions of former players. (I think)

Eddie Large it is, then

Scott Taylor (Tailor)

I think it comes down to respect. I don't think Cooper, RVN or Marti commanded any respect, not because who they were, but more they had no clear plan on how they wanted us to play. I saw no evidence under all 3 tenures that there was a understanding of what we were supposed to be doing on the pitch. Professional footballers, who most have played at a high level, soon call out managers who can't communicate their ideas clearly or have no alternative plans to change things. This is why Enzo was successful, he had a plan that the players here at the time bought into and believed in and whilst things didn't always go smoothly, the players still played for the manager because they believed ultimately that it would work. So yes, someone needs to come in, not necessarily to kick ar$e, but to gain some level of respect so the players want to go out a play for the manager, club and fans. I know some will say they get paid a King's ransom and should go out and give 100%, but if you are demotivated, lacking morale and frustrated, most people in the work place will under achieve.

It's going to be a long time before can can attract an elite manager, so what ever choice is made, a significant number on here will be disappointed. Do we take a chance with an upcoming manager from a lower league or go with experience. Personally, I'd like experience as an interim until the end of the season just to steady the ship, then look to reset in the summer.