Manwell Pablo

Leicester Road and Hinckley AFC were the phoenix clubs.

Just so much wrong with saying it’s the clubs normal place. I mean even if it was correct (which it historically is not, no club that has only played 1 league winning season in league one in its 146 year history should ever consider 22nd In the championship as its correct place) this club has spiralled from a position where this should not be possible, doesn’t matter if you are Man United or Coalville town you shouldn’t be spiralling from multiple domestic level trophies several seasons in Europe (reaching the latter stages at that) to the third tier with severe financial issues and keeping the people responsible for over seeing that.

😂 The less said about Hinckley’s split the better I feel, serious amount of bad feeling there.

There’s a team element to it that’s for sure, you don’t conceed every game through having a bad back line alone. but in the same breath it’s normally a heavy contributing factor 😂

Janick is the best we’ve got there I agree, clearly flawed but every defender in the squad is that’s why we let in goals every game regardless of who is playing.

You really don’t need to over analyse statistics to know we concede far too many goals 😂 the statistic we haven't kept a clean sheet in over half a season alone is damming enough, unless we score 2 goals we aren’t picking up three points.

His professionalism is terrible but then he thinks he’s too good to be here, his motives for that will only be known to him but if it’s because he thinks the club is being run farcically it’s hard to disagree with him. To be clear I’m not standing up for him he should do the job he’s paid to do he’s a football player not a director. In terms of ability he’s clearly a good player. Not as good as his pay packet suggests however and that’s why he should be more professional.

It’s tragically bad to the point where Skipp looks like Maldini when he has to fill in. What are we on now in terms of games without a clean sheet, got to mid to late 20’s by now.

Some mighty over reactions on here Second half fair enough that’s where we need to be, first half was abysmal and we are lucky Stoke hasn’t got out of sight.

Talented player imo, hopefully he gets out of this shit show of a club and has a good career.

I am normally far more invested in Non League than I am in Leicester in general terms these days and have been as I have invested more time there in several guises. However I do view the club as a kind of start of it all, somewhere my family took me as a child, somewhere I went home and away with in my early 20's before I got back into playing myself on a Saturday and, most importantly a gateway into football football for the entire county of Leicestershire for kids from Ashby to Oakham and everywhere in between. If it has to operate within the frameworks of a "Sporting Type Entertainment" product to achieve that then that is the way it has to be, I can't fight that, I can't even convince enough people that getting rid of Top and Rudkin is a good idea so I've got no chance on restructuring the English game. I do have far more chance of doing what's right for Leicester City and Leicestershire football and so I'm sticking to that for now.

Your club is dying and it wont take any part in anything unless it is managed properly. That's the point, bigger points about the way football is run are a distant priority. Especially with this administration. People can claim morality over rules when it comes to the footballing bodies, but when we are fans of a club is involved with a company that points gambling consumers at risk and doesn't respect the needs of it's working class staff members it's quite easy to lose any empathy for them in that regard when it comes to the big boys getting away with things and Leicester City not, the big boys who run our club probably had a stress free Christmas on big salaries knowing full well our staff didn't get their wages when they expected them at next to no notice. That is where all sympathy dies.

Chelsea broke no rules what they did between their holding companies is perfectly legal. Manchester City are in a legal battle with the Premier League. Don't hate the player hate the game, which you appear to be doing and is fine. This Is a Leicester City Forum, I would far rather have the owners of Chelsea or Manchester City involved at our club than our current ones as they know how to navigate the game. By taking issue with Footballing institutions instead of blaming our owners for not keeping us safe you are neglecting what is a core point of keeping this club alive. It's a fair point to make but a completely redundant one at this point, this club is being miss managed. This is a business needing to operate in the parameters it is given, they aren't doing that. If you want to campaign and change the way football is ran then I'd wait until this is over, we have done far too much to damage ourselves without blaming them and that is what needs to change first.

The two events I mentioned happened within about 13 months of each other, over 30 years ago. Knowing there was a tiny gap between the two event happening is not mainstream knowledge You either follow serial killer closely enough off the top of your head to be considered a bit strange to know that, Or more likely you've gone fact checking on the internet to try and point out a tiny hole in a otherwise extremely tight argument because you wanted to try and discredit someone who has pulled your pants down in an online argument and have picked the flimsy's point you can find to do so, just because it's factually correct, without adding anything to the actual discussion in the process. Either way I would say I'm concerned about you but I really don't care. Like I say I'll take the correction, Jeffry Darhma died before OJ was acquitted, sure that's valuable information we all need to keep at the forefront of our heads. And you can pull your pants up again.

Slightly concerning you have been following the lives of murderers that closely to know that but I'll take the correction.

Wont argue with that but that's a wider question isn't it. Our very Leicester City based problem is to do with Leicester City and it's ability to run a tight ship.

It was challenged because the jurisdiction fell between the EFL and the EPL. Can't fault them for that but you're always playing with fire if the two bodies get their ducks in a row. The EFL and the EPL have mitigated that by the EFL handing the case over the the EPL. That defense didn't stand up this month and it certainly wont stand up in an appeal.

No it's not and you are missing the point as well. What's the common denominator, the people who bought the PSR charge to the door, the people who appointed the Spanish PE Teacher, the people who have a wage structure that prevents us from buying anyone because they've handed out contracts to players on 2 or in some cases 3 or 4 times their worth, the people who appointed Ruud, the people who have us in bed with an illegal gambling company as our sponsor, the people who told non playing staff shortly before Christmas they weren't going to get paid the money their familes rely on on the date they expected to get it. The people who will run this club into the ground if we keep excusing them.

Correct. Not sure what point you are trying to make, given we are clearly guilty and correct procedure has been followed. This is exactly why the Manchester City case is taking so long.

It's an analogy used for comedic and dramatic effect it's not supposed to be taking with the differing workings of the comparable systems being taken into account - I'm boiling down, if he can get away with it why can I into it's simplest form.

That's the problem, you get sick and tired of it and eventually your mind set just thinks sod it lets let them stay in charge and try and excuse every mistake they've made and see where that leaves the club shall we when they keep making more.

You're not alone because unfortunately you are one of many people who do not understand the process properly. I'm losing track on the amount of times I've had this conversation and that is why it gets tiresome and I get very short. Ultimately and what really pisses me off about it, it's basically like Jeffrey Dharma getting aggy in the mid 90's because he hasn't got away with multiple homicides because OJ Simpson walked, no accountability for actually breaking the rules and just saying if he can get away with it why can't I. That's not how life works.

They've been charged with 115 separate sporting charges! City's lawyers are just very good at arguing their point and it's 115 charges, that takes some getting through, they are still in court!

That's not a ****ing charge ffs, that's a punishment, the PL DO NOT ISSUE PUNISHMENTS THEY CHARGE CLUBS. Our punishment has been decided by an independent tribunal, not the PL.

Why are you talking about things you clearly know nothing about like you know any facts at all. The English PL have charged Man City 115 times, announced the fact they've charged Manchester City 115 times, read this very carefully, ANY FURTHER DECISION SITS WITH AN INDEPENDANT TRIBUNAL WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PREMIER LEAGUE.