-
Posts
19,365 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
26
Everything posted by Pliskin
-
All reverse psychology to get the lads going š
-
Spaff everywhere.
-
I say **** it off, let everyone go ****ing mental, last club standing wins.
-
Of course haha. Its to save the league, because they will soon realise we will end up like Spain and only have a hand full of teams that can compete, which means there will be a lack of quality players coming into the league! Theyāre strangling themselves.
-
Thereās not much I like about modern football in all honesty, itās a step away from the Disney channel!
-
Iām surprised theyāre letting us do it again after last season š
-
KDH is fantastic, I feel slightly disappointed in him this season, despite as you say 24 goal contributions, but thatās because I know he can be even better. Even in the premier league he put on some fantastic displays in a poor team. But I personally think heās the best player in the league on his day, Iād just like to see him on his day more often.
-
Very tough. Ricardo has been sensational, Winks integral. But Mads is a different level. Iāll be stunned if we keep hold of him, heās going to be one of the best goalkeepers on the world.
-
To be fair. The easy option is to shout sack them. It probably would be much better if they all admitted they were wrong and put it right. Itās not necessarily going to make things better sacking people and hiring new, how do we know that they will get it right? What would be better is as I said, they put it right themselves, that then you would hope theyāve learnt their lessons and hopefully wonāt make the same mistakes again.
-
I wouldnāt say relegation is certain, the bottom cluster of clubs are so poor, we may have to sell the likes of KDH, possibly Winks too and Mads for decent money, and wisely reinvest it. Weāve still got a good chance of surviving, if we do it properly, and donāt take any silly risks.
-
Vardy hat trick.
-
Leicester 'could face points deduction next season'
Pliskin replied to ClaphamFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
Makes sense then. I think the approach towards to leagues is an attempt to somewhat protect ourselves from them, in respect of the EFLās initial approach wasnāt within the regulations which was backed at the time by a panel? Id like to think it wonāt, because our issue isnāt with the independent panel, so they will review the facts and decide based on them. The legal side of things is separate again and against them. Itās all going to be messy, very messy indeed. -
Leicester 'could face points deduction next season'
Pliskin replied to ClaphamFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
There maybe, but it will be down to shortcomings in the EPL and EFLās policies and procedures over any mitigations we may have. Itās always worth it in my opinion, regardless of the negligence displayed by the club, thereās no harm in taking legal advice and in some cases action, because if there are shortcomings noted, the whole case could be thrown out. Itās the point of legal advice, they will scrutinise the powers and policies used, and if thereās something amiss they will challenge it. Then the EPL and EFL would have to change the way they implement the rules and regs. Plus, the EPL canāt just throw more at us because where trying to defend ourselves, if they do they will likely lose that battle, as they will only be able to impose punishment in line with the breaches. Id argue them giving Forest points back for ābeing good boys and girlsā may indicate a shortcoming in their policies, theyāve opened themselves up a little bit with that move, if youāre going to punish a club, punish them properly. Itās all a bit of a mess from all sides, it wouldnāt surprise me if there are some legal abnormalities within the EPL and EFLās policies, just because of how brash they are at times. -
Theyāve both been injured, and now theyāre unlikely to be used because of our situation, there no was Enzo will risk playing them at the minute.
-
What would it take to turn on the owners?
Pliskin replied to MattFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
Didnāt Everton argue that 10 points was going into administration levels of charges? Thatās what an Everton fan has told me, and thatās why they reduced it. So if what he said is true, then unless weāve had multiple separate breaches, a breach is a breach, and itās the same deduction regardless? I donāt know how the points are administered, but do the PL just decide based on your level of breach? -
What would it take to turn on the owners?
Pliskin replied to MattFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
In terms of punishments, surely if itās the premier league it will be in line with the rest of the league. I imagine us getting legal protection is that weāre defending ourselves from the off, yes we have breached, but the PL can still only punish us proportionately, and not add extra because they want to punish us even more, because legally we could probably stop that. So, we could still only end up with 6 points deducted? Surely? -
What would it take to turn on the owners?
Pliskin replied to MattFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
But to the detriment of the club. We probably could have continued to have success if we werenāt so negligent with the finances. The contracts and wages have killed usā¦. We tried to financially compete with the likes of Liverpool, Man U, Chelsea and Arsenalā¦.. these clubs are financial powerhouses, for which we can never financially compete against. To even attempt to is negligentā¦. We could have still have been successful but not have been spending more money that the club was even generating. Itās just not acceptable in any walk of life, and the worst part is, we got relegated, the spending didnāt stop and we still managed to fail. Itās the signs of a very badly run club, in fact, weāre probably now amongst the worst run clubs in the country which has been proven factually. -
Tops over reliance in Rudkin is his undoing. But is seems he trusts him explicitly, it wouldnāt surprise me if he has gone for Rudkin for adviceā¦ā¦
-
They are Morons. Itās not disrespectful, whatās disrespectful the the ridiculous state theyāve now left us in. Thereās no defence at allā¦ā¦. You canāt bring up success as a defence, itās not even negligence it goes well beyond that. This is a club, that when they already knew they were in breach, still offered Harrison Ā£100k a weekā¦ā¦. Knowing they were in breach still have given Winks a reported Ā£80k a weekā¦ā¦.. This is incompetence, ineptitude, insanityā¦ā¦. To suggest anything other is ridiculous. Top, cannot run this football club, he has not got a clue what he is doing. And he is surrounded by people who are equally as incompetent. He either needs to sack everyone around him, employ a more competent backroom staff, and then take a step back and just contribute under their advice, sack everyone around him, and sell the club. He has destroyed his fathers legacy, everything we built up over years has been ruined because of the few absolutely brainless seasons. A free beer and cake canāt get them out of this one, although it seems a % of the fan base would probably fall for that againā¦ā¦..
-
But, But, But free beer?
-
Top asking Nigel for advice.
-
Protest before and after the game. During the game weāve got to support the teamā¦.. because promotion is the lesser of two evils, and we really do not want to not go up.
-
What would it take to turn on the owners?
Pliskin replied to MattFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
Should already be happening. -
Leicester 'could face points deduction next season'
Pliskin replied to ClaphamFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
Weāre kind of stuck as a fan base nowā¦. Given our fragile position and necessity to go up, turning on the clubs owners could look like weāre turning on the players, and could have a detrimental impact on the ladsā¦ā¦ We have to support the team, but canāt sit back and let the board think that this is remotely acceptableā¦ā¦ -
Leicester 'could face points deduction next season'
Pliskin replied to ClaphamFox's topic in Leicester City Forum
And they still wanted to pay Jack Harrison Ā£100k a weekā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦. (Allegedly)
