Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
GaelicFox

Not signing Michael Keane HUGE mistake

Recommended Posts

Posted

Said this in the summer. Its nauseating to be honest. Should have had Brady as well.

 

In a different universe in terms of the crap we have bought and would not have come in like big time charlies and would have added not detracted.

 

Yeh expensive but 15m on musa and 29m on slimani.....we were robbed and then some.

Posted

You got to laugh at some of the stuff in here. Can the OP say for 100% certain that we could have had him for £20m and they said no? If you work in the hierarchy of the club, please advise but I have a feeling you dont.

 

I too am no expert but from what I understand in the press, we made a bid, Keane turned down a new contract offer as it looked he either wanted to force a move or get a better deal. We then made a further bid and Burnley said no. I remember seeing Dyche get wound up about clubs (more than likely aimed at us) trying to unsettle his players and said he was not for sale. We then went in with a third offer. From the outside it seems only a lunatic 40m offer would have tempted them to sell because they knew how integral he is to them. We tried, tried and tried again and didnt get him because they didnt budge despite the player trying to force a move. We did something similar with Leo in January. Arsenal tried to do that with Vardy last year and Liverpool with Chilwell. Sometimes clubs cant get there own way and this was another example.

 

BTW, he is so important to them that even Chelsea were linked to him throughout December and into Jan along with Everton but Burnley are still not budging.

 

Oh one thing, we had him on loan, he was outstanding and withing a year he moved to Burnley for 2m. If we made any mistake, it was we didnt buy him the first time around as it was obvious then that this lad could be an England International.

Posted

Bearing in mind he wasn't for sale and didn't want to come here, no mistake made. We do need a quality centre back...but the tranbsfer window is slammed shut and no quality free agents that would be sharp enough for the position we find ourselves in.

Posted
4 minutes ago, m4DD0gg said:

Said this in the summer. Its nauseating to be honest. Should have had Brady as well.

 

In a different universe in terms of the crap we have bought and would not have come in like big time charlies and would have added not detracted.

 

Yeh expensive but 15m on musa and 29m on slimani.....we were robbed and then some.

Hindsight. You would have probably moaned if we signed those two.

 

We should have signed Keane after he was on loan to us.

Posted
1 minute ago, Number 6 said:

Keane, Gibson, Maguire...any would have been great.

We went for a young lad in Keane to try to introduce to the squad and team as longer term replacements for Huth and Wes. Only an idiot would have bought someone in to replace one of the two most consistent centre backs in the division last season and two major players in why we won the Championship. They showed no sign whatsoever last season that we need to worry about the centre back position, none at all. Its easy to be a wiseass after the event.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I think Dyche has made some great signings to be fair.

He's gone for proven players from the English divisions, rather than foucussing on foreign talent. It seems to be working. They seem to have that mentality of we're all in it together. He's been very canny imo and in Robbie Brady they've signed a player I'd have liked at City.

Guest Mickyblueeyes
Posted

It was. But at the time it seemed a stupid amount. He's worth it now, no question.

Posted
3 minutes ago, lgfualol said:

Hindsight. You would have probably moaned if we signed those two.

 

We should have signed Keane after he was on loan to us.

Not at all it was bloody obvious in the summer we needed a new CB and he was perfect.

 

Brady perhaps maybe not but he was available last week.

Posted
35 minutes ago, GaelicFox said:

£20m would have bought Keane 

 

when you think what we spent on Musa :revenge:

 

I'm convinced if we bought Young Keane we would be midfield now 

 

might be the biggest mistake we made since giving Kante an exit clause dreamed up by a moron 

 

 

- Not signing Keane.

- Sacking the psychologist.

- Not signing better players in the summer.

- Not signing better players in January.

 

Soo many mistakes.

Posted
20 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

How do you know he didn't want to come plus that is just a silly comparison! we needed a competent defender it isn't hard to see why whether that was Keane or someone else

If he wanted to come he would be here.

 

People think they know about transfer deals, they don't. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, matty98 said:

David Luiz, one of the best center backs in the world went for 30m in the summer. 

A joke player till this season and his managers ability to make him look better than he is 

 

i suspect PSG and Chelsea had a deal on this player returning all the time

 

he would cost 60m for anyone this summer 

Posted
39 minutes ago, crazyleicester said:

You got to laugh at some of the stuff in here. Can the OP say for 100% certain that we could have had him for £20m and they said no? If you work in the hierarchy of the club, please advise but I have a feeling you dont.

 

I too am no expert but from what I understand in the press, we made a bid, Keane turned down a new contract offer as it looked he either wanted to force a move or get a better deal. We then made a further bid and Burnley said no. I remember seeing Dyche get wound up about clubs (more than likely aimed at us) trying to unsettle his players and said he was not for sale. We then went in with a third offer. From the outside it seems only a lunatic 40m offer would have tempted them to sell because they knew how integral he is to them. We tried, tried and tried again and didnt get him because they didnt budge despite the player trying to force a move. We did something similar with Leo in January. Arsenal tried to do that with Vardy last year and Liverpool with Chilwell. Sometimes clubs cant get there own way and this was another example.

 

BTW, he is so important to them that even Chelsea were linked to him throughout December and into Jan along with Everton but Burnley are still not budging.

 

Oh one thing, we had him on loan, he was outstanding and withing a year he moved to Burnley for 2m. If we made any mistake, it was we didnt buy him the first time around as it was obvious then that this lad could be an England International.

Very fair comment I must say; especially since he played for us in 2013 and should have been purchased then!...but we didn't...perhaps Walsh and Pearson thought he was no good? lol

Posted
21 minutes ago, Sionnach gorm said:

Very fair comment I must say; especially since he played for us in 2013 and should have been purchased then!...but we didn't...perhaps Walsh and Pearson thought he was no good? lol

At the time i thought he would go on to play for United and we had no chance in keeping him. For some reason United preferred to keep on an ageing Rio Ferdinand and Sir Alex always liked Johnny Evans. When he was made available for sale I was really surprised we didnt make a move!

Posted
1 hour ago, crazyleicester said:

We went for a young lad in Keane to try to introduce to the squad and team as longer term replacements for Huth and Wes. Only an idiot would have bought someone in to replace one of the two most consistent centre backs in the division last season and two major players in why we won the Championship. They showed no sign whatsoever last season that we need to worry about the centre back position, none at all. Its easy to be a wiseass after the event.

Completely agree, which is why I mentioned 3 young CBs. They were always both getting towards the end of their careers. I think most just wanted some young blood who could gain experience alongside them.

Posted
1 hour ago, matty98 said:

They wanted 30 million, he's not worth that

In this crazy market then yes he is. Compared to how much players go for these days it's well worth paying that for a player who may well keep you in the premier league, where staying us worth £70m these days... 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...