Match Ratings : Leicester City 3-0 Watford - Results & Man of the Match

[DB11]

Saturday 6 May 2017, 15:00
Barclays Premier League
King Power Stadium, Leicester

---

Leicester City 3

Ndidi 38, Mahrez 58, Albrighton 90+2

Watford 0

---

 

Total Votes: 157

 

FoxesTalk Man of the Match: Marc Albrighton

1. Marc Albrighton : 8.72
2. Kasper Schmeichel : 7.93
3. Riyad Mahrez : 7.92
4. Jamie Vardy : 7.78
5. Wilfred Ndidi : 7.55
6. Danny Simpson : 7.51
7. Yohan Benalouane : 7.39
8. Robert Huth : 7.25
9. Christian Fuchs : 7.24
10. (SUB) Islam Slimani : 6.86
11. Shinji Okazaki : 6.46
12. (SUB) Demarai Gray : 6.32
13. (SUB) Andy King : 6.30
14. Danny Drinkwater : 6.09

 

Team Performance: 7.24 (8/50)

 

Manager Performance: 7.98 (12/50)

 

Opposition Performance: 4.60 (46/50)

 

Officials Performance (Ref: Roger East): 6.91 (7/50)

 

Overall Manager Confidence: 95.51% (-1.23%)

[kingcarr21]

Comfortable 3-0 win and peoples confidence in Shakey goes down.

[davieG]

11 minutes ago, kingcarr21 said:

Comfortable 3-0 win and peoples confidence in Shakey goes down.

Probably because he didn't play Musa 

[Koke]

Can't the manager get a rating like players? That way it's more applicable. It's better than just Stay or Go surely?

 

For example Albrighton got 8.2 on average and Shakespeare got 8.1 on average for this game.

[Guest the fox]

I'm one of drinky's biggest "critics", but come on now. He was nowhere near our worst performer. But hey, people need a punishing bag after the usual suspect played good the last game.

 

[Hammo]

1 minute ago, the fox said:

I'm one of drinky's biggest "critics", but come on now. He was nowhere near our worst performer. But hey, people need a punishing bag after the usual suspect played good the last game.

 

It's a democratic vote, and I invariably find this threadto be an accurate reflection of what I see. People generally mark how they see it, not because of an agenda. I know I do and Drinkwater definitely ranked last in my selection.

 

Maybe you'd prefer the Mercury ratings where no one ever merits less than 6.

[DB11]

50 minutes ago, Koke said:

Can't the manager get a rating like players? That way it's more applicable. It's better than just Stay or Go surely?

 

For example Albrighton got 8.2 on average and Shakespeare got 8.1 on average for this game.

What do you think Manager Performance: 7.98 (12/50) is generated from?

[Guest the fox]

DB must be fuming knowing that he has to point that out every other match rating thread

[Koke]

7 minutes ago, DB11 said:

What do you think Manager Performance: 7.98 (12/50) is generated from?

 

My bad. I hadn't seen that

 

Sorry.

[Koke]

Then why can't people see that the (-1.23) is compared to the manager score from the previous game. Not that people like him less after a routine 3-0 win but because the manager performance v WBA was deemed better than the the manager performance v Watford.

[DB11]

13 minutes ago, Koke said:

Then why can't people see that the (-1.23) is compared to the manager score from the previous game. Not that people like him less after a routine 3-0 win but because the manager performance v WBA was deemed better than the the manager performance v Watford.

Because the -1.23 is based on more people voting go this game than they did last game. 

 

As shown when Ranieri left, it does show a clear trend over the course of the manager's reign even if game by game the fluctuation doesn't appear to make sense. 

[Melbourne Fuchs]

I though Huth was (uncharacteristically) our worst player. Surprised Fuchs was rated lower than him, even though it was only a small difference. 

[Nod.E]

19 hours ago, DB11 said:

Because the -1.23 is based on more people voting go this game than they did last game. 

 

As shown when Ranieri left, it does show a clear trend over the course of the manager's reign even if game by game the fluctuation doesn't appear to make sense. 

The game fluctuation doesn't make sense when the going is good. In circumstances in which any sane person would keep the manager the stay/go percentage simply becomes a representation of how many 'hilarious' voters decided to 'banter' the vote.

[WigstonWanderer]

Perhaps Mahrez' high rating will cheer up our Algerian friends 

[fazzyfox]

With manager performance / confidence :-

 

It's not the exact same group of voters marking week in week out, even with the guidelines their "standards" will differ slightly from person to person so whilst the pattern is very interesting it doesn't mean the same people have increased or decreased their appreciation / faith.

 

A match like Watford required less managerial masterstrokes than the digging in and holding on away to 8th placed West Brom. He's on a hiding to nothing though, draw or lose to that Watford side and he's blamed for inadequate substitutions and tactics, beat them comfortably without changing shape and they were there for the taking anyway! It could be said he managed the Watford game absolutely perfectly resulting in top marks or that his skills weren't at all tested and can't warrant him being over complimented!

[NotTheMarketLeader]

23 hours ago, WigstonWanderer said:

Perhaps Mahrez' high rating will cheer up our Algerian friends 

Maybe we should change the system then and rate by 1st and 2nd half performances, so we can have him low down on at least one ranking per game.