hackneyfox Posted 22 January 2019 Author Posted 22 January 2019 10 minutes ago, Col city fan said: Same here. I thought he was sacked by Top then Vichai being the wise old owl he was, thought it was too hasty so reinstated him? If Top was in Bangkok it's unlikely it was him who sacked.
foxfanazer Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 6 minutes ago, hackneyfox said: FFS leave it alone. I wanted an answer not a bitchfest. Sorry forum police
hackneyfox Posted 22 January 2019 Author Posted 22 January 2019 6 minutes ago, foxfanazer said: Sorry forum police It's been done to death so why get so precious on a thread that has nothing to do with whether NFP was a good manger or not?
Stadt Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 19 minutes ago, RoboFox said: In before this descends into a Pearson vs Ranieri slagfest. Pearson better manager than pasta shagger Rainieri . All Pearsons work and he would of won us the league anyway...!!!
foxfanazer Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 4 minutes ago, hackneyfox said: It's been done to death so why get so precious on a thread that has nothing to do with whether NFP was a good manger or not? If somebody makes a a stupid comment that I disagree with I'll post a reply whether the OP approves or not. Pretty naive to think a Pearson thread wouldn't spark the same old nonsense
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 Yet another FoxesTalk thread descends into cannibalism.
hackneyfox Posted 22 January 2019 Author Posted 22 January 2019 1 minute ago, foxfanazer said: If somebody makes a a stupid comment that I disagree with I'll post a reply whether the OP approves or not. Pretty naive to think a Pearson thread wouldn't spark the same old nonsense Only because you allow yourself to be triggered (by 'the same old nonsense') and then fcuk up a thread.
foxfanazer Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 1 minute ago, hackneyfox said: How do you put someone on ignore? Top right, account, ignored users, add new ignored user
foxfanazer Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 Just now, hackneyfox said: Only because you allow yourself to be triggered (by 'the same old nonsense') and then fcuk up a thread. It hasn't really ****ed up the thread has it? You asked a question and it's been answered. Probably didn't need a new thread in truth
hackneyfox Posted 22 January 2019 Author Posted 22 January 2019 24 minutes ago, foxfanazer said: It hasn't really ****ed up the thread has it? You asked a question and it's been answered. Probably didn't need a new thread in truth Why thanks for deciding whether or not it needed a new thread Mr Forum Police Can you point me to the thread where this subject was covered in depth and I'll take my answer from that?
hackneyfox Posted 22 January 2019 Author Posted 22 January 2019 27 minutes ago, foxfanazer said: Top right, account, ignored users, add new ignored user Cheers, it wasn't you by the way who is going on ignore.
ajthefox Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 1 hour ago, foxfanazer said: Top right, account, ignored users, add new ignored user 1 hour ago, hackneyfox said: Cheers, it wasn't you by the way who is going on ignore. The quick way to ignore the biggest idiots is to just hover your cursor over their username in the thread and click ignore there.
Guest Col city fan Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 @foxfanazer stop fookin up threads, you Pearsonite
gw_leics772 Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 Wow, cant believe its descended this badly without anybody asking the most relevant question. Should puel get sacked? And how does he rate against ranieri and Pearson, but to make it fair we need the pearson and ranieri choices x 2, ie season pre great escape and trophies and great escape, better throw cambiasso in. Ranieri first season and second. And 3 for puel, personality, man city and chelsea results, and newport cardiff and southampton results POLLLLLLLL!!!!! I reckon that will settle it once and for all and everyone will be satisfied that it was democratic, and we can never mention it again (just like brexit)
David Hankey Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 5 hours ago, hackneyfox said: Well if Top has a track record of sacking then yes it may. If it doesn't matter why are you taking an interest? I can't see the importance of who made the decision. It's not as if it was Mandaric at the helm who infamously quoted "if it takes 20 managers".......... Vichai nor Top were and are not anywhere near the hire and fire maverick of our former owner else Puel would have gone weeks ago.
funkyrobot Posted 22 January 2019 Posted 22 January 2019 5 hours ago, Col city fan said: Same here. I thought he was sacked by Top then Vichai being the wise old owl he was, thought it was too hasty so reinstated him? Wrong way round Col et al. I remember it cos I was gutted when Pearson was ‘sacked’ and then very impressed with Top when he talked his dad out of it....
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.