Open letter to LCFC

[NFPOUT]

We need to turn our backs to the pitch at a given time at the next game. It’ll make the point totally and everyone can join in without missing a game.

[grobyfox1990]

33 minutes ago, Beachyboy said:

Maybe there is a clause in the contract that says relegation zone after 10 games? I know Tops has blind faith in Rogers but a successful businessman would always address negative performance in a contract surely?

That seems a bit far fetched especially so early in the season. The only thing I can think of is they chop him and don’t have to pay him out if he gets a job of equivalent pay/stature within X period of time. His contract will be far more complex than anything I’ve ever dealt with though so all speculation 

Edited 9 October 2022 by grobyfox1990
Sorry misunderstood post initially

[Parafox]

2 hours ago, Izzy said:

If all else fails, write an open letter I say 

Always a winning tactic. 

 

[Skid_1884]

2 hours ago, Simoken said:

this is embarrasing.

At least they are trying something and genuinely give a shit

[StanSP]

I think it needs an open letter in the Leicester Mercury to be honest.

 

Or even better, one of the nationals.

[fazzyfox]

3 hours ago, SemperEadem said:

Jim aint gunna do shit with that other than delete. If folk want to send emails you got to be sending them higher up.

I’ve forwarded it to Vestergaard, at least 10 inches higher than Jim.

[deep blue]

On 09/10/2022 at 16:04, lcfcbluearmy said:

Is there an email address for the club I could send this to? 

[email protected].  I've sent an email and at least have had an acknowledgement.  I'm not optimistic that my letter will be considered at all, but I can't see how they can completely ignore a stream of letters, so I would urge all of you to send emails.  There's an alternative address, which I think is [email protected], but maybe someone can correct me on this.

 

I'm about to resend my email with additional comments.  It feels better and more positive than just moaning on here, which is what is so easy to do.

[deep blue]

On 09/10/2022 at 16:46, grobyfox1990 said:

They know all of this already lol. They aren’t blind. Might as well include a link to a theory proving the sky is blue in your email. They need solutions. So unless you’ve got a spare £10m, a decent lawyer who can find a way through the contract, or a replacement, why bother sending 

Maybe they aren't, but maybe they are.  It would have been better business use of the Wout money to get rid of Rodgers instead.  As for the knowledge of the board, it would be interesting to know whether they're primarily business people or whether they have any particular football knowledge.  Do you, or anyone else on here, have any information about them?

Edited 10 October 2022 by deep blue
Omission

[grobyfox1990]

13 minutes ago, deep blue said:

Maybe they aren't, but maybe they are.  It would have been better business use of the Wout money to get rid of Rodgers instead.  As for the knowledge of the board, it would be interesting to know whether they're primarily business people or whether they have any particular football knowledge.  Do you, or anyone else on here, have any information about them?

https://www.lcfc.com/club/senior-management
 

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04593477/officers

 

[lcfcbluearmy]

Just a note to anyone who feels the need to privately message me telling me that my "rant against Rodgers" was wrong and he has never talked the club down. 

 

Please don't

If you would like quotes there are plenty of examples in the Brendan Rodgers thread and in post match interviews for you to look at. 

 

The first one that comes to my head though is where he said that the club were just happy to stay in the league when he arrived which I includwd in my original post

 

Thank you

[PAPA LAZAROU]

On 09/10/2022 at 16:37, Corky said:

Even the manager probably thinks he should be sacked.

even the manager hopes he will be sacked -Kerching !

[MalletFox]

On 09/10/2022 at 15:56, lcfcbluearmy said:

Thank you for reading and I look forward to your detailed response

 

Thank you

Hahahaha! What response are you expecting? A fully blown report detailing the reasons for the non-dismissal of Rodgers?

[Jattdogg]

Watch us get banned from the KP for our foxestalk forum posts

[Daggers]

Has there been an open reply yet?

[Guest Col city fan]

5 hours ago, deep blue said:

Maybe they aren't, but maybe they are.  It would have been better business use of the Wout money to get rid of Rodgers instead.  As for the knowledge of the board, it would be interesting to know whether they're primarily business people or whether they have any particular football knowledge.  Do you, or anyone else on here, have any information about them?

I’ve written on here before that Rudkin used to head up the youth academy. He’s worked himself up from the inside so to speak, and I have no idea if he has the credentials to be Head of Recruitment or whatever his role actually is. 
All those people I know, who knew him back then, basically say they didn’t like him and that he was always going to get his feet under the table somehow.

But the Thais must respect him for whatever reason. That’s obvious. 
And to be fair, we have made some amazing signings over the years, but particularly I would argue, when Walsh was Head Scout. Since Pearson and his team left, we’ve also signed some absolute duffers too.