Harry Winks

[RoboFox]

42 minutes ago, Product of 84 said:

You'd think relegation from the Championship would look pretty rubbish on his CV. Perhaps he will play a bit between now and the end of the season. After all he wants away and if he can't get a move right now he needs to secure a team for next season. I'm not sure how many clubs would be that interested in him.

He obviously doesn’t care about optics or his reputation otherwise he wouldn’t have acted like a **** for the last two years.

 

Edited 31 January by RoboFox

[Bert]

We are better team with him playing. What’s the lesser of two evils? 
 

To be fair to him he came down the whole line of fans after the game signed and had photos, although he didn’t say a single word. 

[Number 6]

Just now, MGLCFC said:

Even though we were better once he was introduced. With him playing we have a chance of survival. I take it you want us in this league. 

Yes. But he's disrespected the club on numerous occasions. I give a shit what division Leicester are in next season, Harry winks does not.

[MGLCFC]

Just now, phoneticerror said:

And we’d be a lot better off being owned by the Saudi’s. Sometimes ethics matter.

So you know the exact reason behind the issues. If Kingy thinks he should be selected, surely we should get behind the interim manager?

[MGLCFC]

Just now, Number 6 said:

Yes. But he's disrespected the club on numerous occasions. I give a shit what division Leicester are in next season, Harry winks does not.

But could help still be in this division - he's better than what's available at present.

[Claudio Fannieri]

You can see why he is being reintegrated, looks highly unlikely he will leave before the deadline and Brussell will love him in his system

[BrilliantFox]

Ever since Cifuentes kicked him out the squad, our results have been poor.

I couldn't care less about his personality or living habits, we're at a point now where we just need the best players to play on the pitch.

 

Maresca was constantly foaming at the mouth about how important Winks was when we won this league.

Edited 31 January by BrilliantFox

[Number 6]

1 minute ago, MGLCFC said:

But could help still be in this division - he's better than what's available at present.

Don't care. It's the wrong example to set. If he's shown some contrition at the start of the season then he might have had a route back in. Instead he's scoring goals and not celebrating. Can't be bothered with him. Should be left to train on his own and not involved in match days.

[Number 6]

3 minutes ago, MGLCFC said:

But could help still be in this division - he's better than what's available at present.

Winks isn't the cure, he's the illness.

[inckley fox]

57 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

For the remainder of this season, and where we are at with players available to us, he should be starting every game he is available.

Then we've learnt nothing.

[FoxinNotts]

Just now, inckley fox said:

Then we've learnt nothing.

Correct 

[HP1]

6 minutes ago, Bert said:

We are better team with him playing. What’s the lesser of two evils? 
 

To be fair to him he came down the whole line of fans after the game signed and had photos, although he didn’t say a single word. 

Who in their right mind would stay to the end and have photos with - and ask for autographs from - these players

[sm1]

Winks plays for himself and when the goings good, he's one our best players. The problem is when things aren't going well and you need players to stand up, he'll go missing. Should've been told to fuch off in the summer, but thankfully he'll be off at the end of the season.

Edited 31 January by sm1

[MGLCFC]

Just now, Number 6 said:

Winks isn't the cure, he's the illness.

Your entitled to your opinion, but if the manager wishes him to be part of the match day squad, then I'll support King's decision. You must be blind if you can't see we were significantly better when Winks on the field today. We actually looked like we might score. 

[phoneticerror]

11 minutes ago, MGLCFC said:

So you know the exact reason behind the issues. If Kingy thinks he should be selected, surely we should get behind the interim manager?

3 managers have dropped him. We don’t need to know the exact reasons. Listen to yourself…

[Number 6]

7 minutes ago, MGLCFC said:

Your entitled to your opinion, but if the manager wishes him to be part of the match day squad, then I'll support King's decision. You must be blind if you can't see we were significantly better when Winks on the field today. We actually looked like we might score. 

Before Winks 0-0. We lost 2-0. Harry Winks is not good enough to sell your soul for.

[MGLCFC]

Just now, phoneticerror said:

3 managers have dropped him. We don’t need to know the exact reasons. Listen to yourself…

You're missing the point. If the current manager feels he warrants a place in the match day squad, then I'm prepared to back his decision, as he, rather than you or me, have a greater insight into the internal issues surrounding the problem. Winks was good today, I can understand people feel he's let himself, the club and supporters down, but the crisis we are in, in particular in midfield, he is a better option than the others.

[MGLCFC]

Just now, Number 6 said:

Before Winks 0-0. We lost 2-0. Harry Winks is not good enough to sell your soul for.

Poor argument - look at our XG once he was introduced - much more likely to score. He can hardly be blamed for the 2 goals conceded.

[phoneticerror]

1 minute ago, MGLCFC said:

Poor argument - look at our XG once he was introduced - much more likely to score. He can hardly be blamed for the 2 goals conceded.

You’re an idiot. Missing the point entirely!!

Edited 31 January by phoneticerror

[inckley fox]

18 minutes ago, Bert said:

We are better team with him playing. What’s the lesser of two evils? 
 

To be fair to him he came down the whole line of fans after the game signed and had photos, although he didn’t say a single word. 

The facts don't back you up. We've won three, drawn five and lost six of the games he's started. Over quite a large sample of games, we're worse with him in the side than without. A half-decent sub appearance really shouldn't distort our analysis to this degree.

[Number 6]

1 minute ago, MGLCFC said:

Poor argument - look at our XG once he was introduced - much more likely to score. He can hardly be blamed for the 2 goals conceded.

Not saying he's to blame, I'm saying he isn't a good enough player for us to decide we have no morals. He didn't turn us into world beaters today did he? 

[MGLCFC]

1 minute ago, phoneticerror said:

You’re an idiot. Missing the point entirely!!

Look in the mirror, clown

[MGLCFC]

Just now, Number 6 said:

Not saying he's to blame, I'm saying he isn't a good enough player for us to decide we have no morals. He didn't turn us into world beaters today did he? 

But he's much better than what we have available at present, isn't he?

[BrilliantFox]

10 minutes ago, phoneticerror said:

3 managers have dropped him.

3 rubbish failures of managers dropped him.

Yet the only good manager we've had adored him.

 

What does that tell you?

[turkish14]

I do love the comments that winks is this and that, has said this, disrespected the club etc 

 

without no actual 100% proof. Just assumptions, except he holding a placard showing his love for Emzo 😆
 

yet proven negative behaviour by hamza over many occasions since Covid, are overlooked and downplayed.