Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, SemperEadem said:

Silver lining was at least no one was spat at this week.

 

As plenty others have pointed out, the stance between here and the majority in the stadium is poles apart.

Time for those of us on here who go to games still to up their protests then. 
 

I like what you guys do, and it shouldn’t fall to you alone to initiate the protests, but I think the times come whereby you as a group should be thinking about forgetting the relationship you’ve developed with the club over the years and really start to ramp up the pressure. Online, and inside and outside of the stadium. I’m talking incessant protests, not a banner unfurled at FT.

 

Organise a sit in at the end of FT. 
Keep poking the hornets nest.

 

Nobody capitalised on the protests before the arsenal game and that was a mistake in itself.
 

Sure, it might mean the end of UFS short term, whilst the owners ousted, but I’m pretty sure with new ownership you’d get a blank canvas to start a new relationship with the new owners/powers that be. 
 

If you, as a group or individuals, were banned by the club for organising protests then it’s something that could generate more media attention against KP if you went public with the bans.

 

The balls in your court, (as it is with all our fans) but I think it’s got to the point where you might need to start thinking about sacrificing yourselves to save the club.

 

Just my opinion 
 

 

Edited by The Year Of The Fox
Posted
1 minute ago, HybridFox said:

Lord knows why they keep giving us loans lol 

Because they have made a **** tonne of interest off us. 

 

Its becoming more precarious, like a using a payday loan to pay for gambling, one day its going to come to a head as we keep losing. 

 

Unless Top has been getting on the same Leicester to lose and concede over 2 goals bet builder that's done me proud for the last few home games. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Someone is likely to offer £5m for Nelson and we’ll be forced to take it 

 

Bouba into the last year of his deal should have a reduced wage of 50k.  We’ll be lucky to get £4m for him and that’s not far off his amortised value. Same with Daka   These boys should have been dumped two years ago for 10m when we were offered that.  Those making decisions are clueless

 

mads will bring in £25/30m which brings a decent wedge into the pot

wilf could bring £12/15m 

Vestergaard £3m

 VK will cover his amortised value so neutral. 
bek perhaps £20m which brings a few mill in 

faes maybe £10m which is +4m 

winks is more likely to be sold than skipp re amortised value - might bring in £5m in addition to AV

kasey is a sale re all profit on fee - maybe £6m

 

the above will nett approx £50m above amortised values 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, st albans fox said:

Someone is likely to offer £5m for Nelson and we’ll be forced to take it 

 

Bouba into the last year of his deal should have a reduced wage of 50k.  We’ll be lucky to get £4m for him and that’s not far off his amortised value. Same with Daka   These boys should have been dumped two years ago for 10m when we were offered that.  Those making decisions are clueless

 

mads will bring in £25/30m which brings a decent wedge into the pot

wilf could bring £12/15m 

Vestergaard £3m

 VK will cover his amortised value so neutral. 
bek perhaps £20m which brings a few mill in 

faes maybe £10m which is +4m 

winks is more likely to be sold than skipp re amortised value - might bring in £5m in addition to AV

kasey is a sale re all profit on fee - maybe £6m

 

the above will nett approx £50m above amortised values 

 

No one took Wilf on a free last year because of his wage

 

10m for Faes? from where? 

Vest - 3m?

 

I cant see anyone taking Winks on his wage either. 

 

If anyone makes a bid for any of them, take it, take the psr hit and rebuild. 

  • Like 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, Foxin_Mad said:

No one took Wilf on a free last year because of his wage

 

10m for Faes? from where? 

Vest - 3m?

 

I cant see anyone taking Winks on his wage either. 

 

If anyone makes a bid for any of them, take it, take the psr hit and rebuild. 

Wilf’s reduced wage in the championship will be max £50k. Someone in the PL will take that on.  Could be that we agreed to a relegation release  clause which maybe nearer to £7m 

Someone is paying 10m for faes.  
Similarly, £3m for vesty in a deep back four/five  type system is gettable 

 

winks wage - see above re wilf. 

we will have a decimated squad next year for sure re experience 

hopefully the youngsters can step up 

 

Posted

People spat at UFS ? So these animals in the fanbase who attacked people for holding the Rodgers banner are now spitting at people ? 
 

We need to get these KP affiliates out regardless of the ownership. This is a family club and Supreme Leader Ayatollah, General, Major Top (real name Aiyawatt) will not stand for it. If you want your £500 for your best seal impression, stay in line especially when one of his favourite teams come around. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Wilf’s reduced wage in the championship will be max £50k. Someone in the PL will take that on.  Could be that we agreed to a relegation release  clause which maybe nearer to £7m 

Someone is paying 10m for faes.  
Similarly, £3m for vesty in a deep back four/five  type system is gettable 

 

winks wage - see above re wilf. 

we will have a decimated squad next year for sure re experience 

hopefully the youngsters can step up 

 

If we get a combined £20m for Faes, Ndidi and Vestergaard I will run from the clock tower, round the KP and back again with nowt on.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AKCJ said:

If we get a combined £20m for Faes, Ndidi and Vestergaard I will run from the clock tower, round the KP and back again with nowt on.

If Jon Rudkin manages to pull that off maybe hes not such a useless **** after all. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

If we get a combined £20m for Faes, Ndidi and Vestergaard I will run from the clock tower, round the KP and back again with nowt on.

We aren't getting anything remotely useful for any of them because their wages are too high because the bloke who deals with this side of things is a complete ****ing idiot. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

People spat at UFS ? So these animals in the fanbase who attacked people for holding the Rodgers banner are now spitting at people ? 
 

We need to get these KP affiliates out regardless of the ownership. This is a family club and Supreme Leader Ayatollah, General, Major Top (real name Aiyawatt) will not stand for it. If you want your £500 for your best seal impression, stay in line especially when one of his favourite teams come around. 

I think we should have a batter a KPFC fan day where we all pile on and eradicate them. 

  • Like 1
Posted

So sad that they’ve got their wish, that passionate and adoring fans simply do not give a shit anymore. Players are shit and don’t care, board useless and directionless. Too many comfortable yes men doing it for all the wrong reasons and won’t resign.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Foxin_Mad said:

Im not their biggest fans but they are the only ones making any noise about this, then you have some mouthy KPFC Clones giving in large about backing the lads not 'getting on the owner back', I may have to stop going else I will twat one of them soon. 

Like I get it, not everyone in the ground will be supportive of the banners. Plenty of folk dislike UFS but these lines of ‘they don’t support’ or ‘get behind the team’ are just so far away from what happens. As soon as those banners go down it’s back to trying to drag some level of support from the fans to the team again.

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Wilf’s reduced wage in the championship will be max £50k. Someone in the PL will take that on.  Could be that we agreed to a relegation release  clause which maybe nearer to £7m 

Someone is paying 10m for faes.  
Similarly, £3m for vesty in a deep back four/five  type system is gettable 

 

winks wage - see above re wilf. 

we will have a decimated squad next year for sure re experience 

hopefully the youngsters can step up 

 

I think the problem is Rudkin setting ridiculous price tags on the players and scaring the interested parties off. 
 

It seems to have happened on many occasions the last few years. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
Just now, SemperEadem said:

Like I get it, not everyone in the ground will be supportive of the banners. Plenty of folk dislike UFS but these lines of ‘they don’t support’ or ‘get behind the team’ are just so far away from what happens. As soon as those banners go down it’s back to trying to drag some level of support from the fans to the team again.

I agree totally, I think everyone is entitled to their view but I don't get the mindless backing of the Ownership. 

 

I think that UFS are the least of the problems the club has. The whole stadium should be joining in with them.

 

Most of our support is pathetic

Edited by Foxin_Mad
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

People spat at UFS ? So these animals in the fanbase who attacked people for holding the Rodgers banner are now spitting at people ? 
 

We need to get these KP affiliates out regardless of the ownership. This is a family club and Supreme Leader Ayatollah, General, Major Top (real name Aiyawatt) will not stand for it. If you want your £500 for your best seal impression, stay in line especially when one of his favourite teams come around. 

The Rodgers banner lot were spat at as well, if we're talking about Brentford away.

 

As others have said, the mood on here vs. those in the stadium is very different. Most of the stadium is still fully behind Top, Rudkin, RVN etc.

  • Like 1
Posted

By this time next year, the club will be in a worse position than the one King Power found it in. Where do these people go then? How far do we have to drop before there's a more general acceptance that the club's leadership is the problem? 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, ealingfox said:

By this time next year, the club will be in a worse position than the one King Power found it in. Where do these people go then? How far do we have to drop before there's a more general acceptance that the club's leadership is the problem? 

They’ll revert back to the look what we’ve won, much rather be us than Brighton, Palace, Bournemouth etc. 

Posted
2 hours ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Time for those of us on here who go to games still to up their protests then. 
 

I like what you guys do, and it shouldn’t fall to you alone to initiate the protests, but I think the times come whereby you as a group should be thinking about forgetting the relationship you’ve developed with the club over the years and really start to ramp up the pressure. Online, and inside and outside of the stadium. I’m talking incessant protests, not a banner unfurled at FT.

 

Organise a sit in at the end of FT. 
Keep poking the hornets nest.

 

Nobody capitalised on the protests before the arsenal game and that was a mistake in itself.
 

Sure, it might mean the end of UFS short term, whilst the owners ousted, but I’m pretty sure with new ownership you’d get a blank canvas to start a new relationship with the new owners/powers that be. 
 

If you, as a group or individuals, were banned by the club for organising protests then it’s something that could generate more media attention against KP if you went public with the bans.

 

The balls in your court, (as it is with all our fans) but I think it’s got to the point where you might need to start thinking about sacrificing yourselves to save the club.

 

Just my opinion 
 

 

If UFS called on something, big numbers would just do the opposite in spite.

  • Like 4
Posted
20 minutes ago, SemperEadem said:

If UFS called on something, big numbers would just do the opposite in spite.

****, you are into something.....

Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, SemperEadem said:

If UFS called on something, big numbers would just do the opposite in spite.

Sorry but I feel that’s a bit of a weak excuse 

 

Whether others would do it in spite or not, you guys could make a big enough song and dance about it all to the point where it becomes unavoidable for the media to pick up on it properly 

 

I’m not having a go at UFS, but ultimately you’ve got yourself into some sort of position of power, or of at least being listened to by a portion of fellow supporters AND the club (however little they do listen, you at least have half their ear)

 

I believe you guys do and say as much as you dare without upsetting the relationship with the club. 
 

I think it’s time to stop protecting that relationship for the greater good of the club. The way things are going, we might not have a club for you to have a relationship with anyway come the next decade or so.

Edited by The Year Of The Fox
Posted
1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Sorry but I feel that’s a bit of a weak excuse 

 

Whether others would do it in spite or not, you guys could make a big enough song and dance about it all to the point where it becomes unavoidable for the media to pick up on it properly 

 

I’m not having a go at UFS, but ultimately you’ve got yourself into some sort of position of power, or of at least being listened to by a portion of fellow supporters AND the club (however little they do listen, you at least have half their ear)

 

I believe you guys do and say as much as you dare without upsetting the relationship with the club. 
 

I think it’s time to stop protecting that relationship for the greater good of the club. The way things are going, we might not have a club for you to have a relationship with anyway come the next decade or so.

The risk is the club just crackdown and UFS and ban even more members without achieving much at all. A big stunt would catch the media attention for a week which wouldn't be worth effectively wrapping the group up over. The people at the club that deal with UFS are pretty far removed from the top brass. Even at FCC meetings Whelan will just defen the club status quo anyway.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...